[Pkg-Cyrus-imapd-Debian-devel] RFC: Renaming the packages

[Sven Mueller]

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote on 03/12/2005 03:34:
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005, Ondrej Sury wrote:
> 
>>I think that we should keep versioned name, but prepare virtual
>>packages:
>>
>>cyrus-imapd, etc. which would depend on latest cyrus-imapd-x.x packages,
>>same as linux kernel packages and others.
> 
> On the latest *recommended* packages for production use, you mean.  That's
> 2.2, it will take quite a while for 2.3 get to that point after it is
> released ;-)
> 
> But *both* naming schemes are versioned.  We need you to chose *which*
> schema to use:  cyrus##-blah or cyrus-blah-#.#.

After thinking about it for a few days (well, not all of the time of
course), I also would like to see virtual packages named cyrus-blah and
packages for specific versions to be cyrus-blah-## or cyrus-blah-#.#
(not exactly sure which I would prefer).

cu,
sven
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel/attachments/20051206/c809a223/signature.pgp