astronut at dlgeek.net
Thu Jul 20 21:27:27 UTC 2006
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Benjamin E. Seidenberg wrote:
>> Henrique: Do you still think that this statement is true?
>> o Ext2 is slow on very large directories (right now), and sync medatada
>> writes enabled are a huge performance hit. If you need high IO throughput
>> from Cyrus, you will need to use ext3, reiserfs, xfs or something like
>> that. xfs is probably the best one.
> Drop "xfs is probably the best one.". It is best only if you are NOT going
> to suffer a hardware failure or kernel oops.
> But yes, ext2 is still a Bad Idea for Cyrus spools.
>> Is the following true as well?
>> "However, ctl_cyrusdb -r is NOT FULLY IMPLEMENTED YET... you are on
>> your own to recover from corrupt databases."
> Sorry, I have no idea if this one was fixed.
Thanks. I'm going to do another few passes through it, then I would
appreciate if you could take a look since you know the technical details
much better than I do.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel/attachments/20060720/0e644cb3/signature.pgp
More information about the Pkg-Cyrus-imapd-Debian-devel