debian/rules questions and my plans for dual-build.

[Ondrej Sury]

On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 17:52 -0400, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Currently, we have --with-idle set to "poll", using poll for idle
> support. Many people perfer idled, hence the idled branch. However, for
> people who want this, they currently have to build their own package.
> What we want to do is make a package (maybe cyrus-imapd-idled-2.2? Name
> suggestions welcome.) that will conflict with cyrus-imapd-2.2 that
> replaces it with a version of imapd that is compiled for idled support
> (and idled itself, obviously). I want to go about it like this (roughly):

Eh, that seems to be crazy (package-management-wise)... maybe we could
just write patch to support runtime configuration of poll vs. idled?
Has anyone ever thought about this possibility? (hmh?)

Ondrej.
-- 
Ondrej Sury <ondrej at sury.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel/attachments/20060506/cc761a47/attachment.pgp