Upgrading cyrus

[Patrick Goetz]

On 9/22/2010 7:59 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> 
> We still have Cyrus utils with bad (generic) names polluting the global
> namespace.  These need to be prefixed with 'cyr', or moved the heck away
> from /usr/bin and /usr/sbin and into /usr/lib/cyrus*
> 
> We still have missing manpages, and some utils are not being shipped in
> any package (which might be a bug, or not).
>

Presumably the only way to find out what these are is to build the
binary package and install it?  The utility naming thing is really
another upstream problem, although I haven't seen a single cyrus utility
discussed that wasn't already prefaced with cyr_


> We may need to pull whatever is in CVS and still not released, as the
> more active Cyrus developers upstream are focused on 2.4 and other
> stuff.
> 

A while back I committed to submitting all the bugs in debian patches I
could confirm to the cyrus bugzilla.  Now, with 2.4 scheduled to come
out in less than 2 weeks it seems like it hardly worth it.  I think what
I'm going to do in the next couple of days is download the 2.4 source
and only submit the bugs which are still in the 2.4 source code.