<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Anthony Prades <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:toony.debian@chezouam.net">toony.debian@chezouam.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On 03/30/2011 11:27 PM, Thomas Cataldo wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
Could you do this :<br>
<br>
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control<br>
index ba3bf45..3f6ce92 100644<br>
--- a/debian/control<br>
+++ b/debian/control<br>
@@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ Build-Depends: autoconf,<br>
libdb-dev (>= 4.8) | libdb4.8-dev,<br>
libkvm-dev [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64],<br>
libpam0g-dev,<br>
- libextutils-parsexs-perl (>= 2.220600-1),<br>
+ libextutils-parsexs-perl (>= 2.22),<br>
libsasl2-dev (>= 2.1.9),<br>
libsnmp-dev,<br>
libssl-dev,<br>
- libtool (>= 2.2~),<br>
+ libtool (>= 2.2),<br>
libwrap0-dev,<br>
libzephyr-dev,<br>
perl (>= 5.6.0-16~),<br>
<br>
So that cyrus-2.4 packages keep on being buildable on ubuntu 10.04 ?<br>
<br>
I don't think you need precisely those versions.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div></div>
Hi,<br>
<br>
For "libextutils-parsexs-perl" version in squeeze and unstable is more up to date than that into Ubuntu 10.04 (2.220200).<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, I don't know debian policy by heart, by depending on the smallest version you can work with would be fine.</div><div><br></div><div>By the way I did not checked why cyrus sudenly needed a new perl lib between 2 stables versions :/</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div></div>