Question about removal of cyrus-sasl2-mit

Fabian Fagerholm fabbe at paniq.net
Wed Dec 13 15:11:27 CET 2006


On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 01:34 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Indeed, so I think re-adding a libsasl2-gssapi-mit binary package to
> cyrus-sasl2 would be the best option.  Is this in progress?

Yes.

I'm hoping to hear something from Sam with regard to the Kerberos 4
package, but I'm going to upload a new version of cyrus-sasl2 with a
libsasl2-gssapi-mit transition package and the neccessary
Depends/Conflicts/Replaces dance no later than tomorrow.

(I know that Sam is very busy with work, and so am I, so I'm focusing on
the code more than on email at the moment. Sorry if things appear to
have stalled because of this.)

-- 
Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe at paniq.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel/attachments/20061213/d02e584d/attachment.pgp


More information about the Pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel mailing list