Current status?

[Fabian Fagerholm]

On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 14:25 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:12:05PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > I think the point Roberto was trying to make was that it would be less
> > work to have 2.1.22 (i.e. newest latest upstream) with unpolished
> > Debian packaging in etch than shipping the ancient
> > 2.1.19+loadsofpatches. The former will be a lot easier to handle with
> > respect to security updates.
>
> Yes.  That is exactly my meaning.

Sorry, I misunderstood your point. I thought you were saying that we
should push 2.1.22 into etch based on an assumption that it's better
than than the 2.1.19 package, and regardless of security support issues.

-- 
Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe at paniq.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel/attachments/20061023/9f52e0e2/attachment.pgp