Hi Luigi,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Luigi Gangitano <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gangitano@lugroma3.org">gangitano@lugroma3.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
I'd prefer to package drupal modules separately, so that we can update them independently from the main package. drupal7-module-cck would be a good naming scheme.<br></blockquote><div> About module packaging: May I get it as a possible offer for sponsoring my packages? Which modules would you or others prefer to be packaged?<br>
What about drupal7-mod-cck naming scheme? Would it mean you are looking for Drupal7 module packages only, as it may be late for Squeeze with Drupal6?<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
ATM I don't see real advantages switching to the quilt source format, but I'm open to discussion.<br></blockquote><div> It isn't a must to use quilt source format. I tought it's the next
generation, take that step with the new major upstream release of
Drupal. Change all packaging things at once.<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">This should really go upstream. Even more in the Alpha stage of development. We should try to keep differences from upstream at minimum.<br>
</blockquote><div> I do agree. Meanwhile as a separate patch it wouldn't hurt anyway.<br><br>Regards,<br>Kinga<br></div></div>