[Pkg-dspam-misc] Bug#358681: dspam should not depend upon procmail

Matthijs Mohlmann matthijs at cacholong.nl
Sat Apr 1 09:47:21 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thomas Köllmann wrote:
> Package: dspam
> Version: 3.6.4-2+b1
> Severity: normal
> 
> 
> dspam works perfectly with maildrop as MDA instead of procmail.
> 
> Please make the package depend on either procmail or maildrop, or
> maybe make it depend on sensible-mda. Thanks.
> 
Hi,

I don't have a problem to depend on sensible-mda, what do you think ?
And in this way people can decide which MDA they want to use. So I think
this is a good option.

Regards,

Matthijs Mohlmann
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFELkwp2n1ROIkXqbARAuYaAJ4hDlo7Zymi/+Y/l97UlDSg17Z13QCfXSNY
89uhAad53nvUsdP/3r192ew=
=4oK/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Pkg-dspam-misc mailing list