[Pkg-dspam-misc] Bug#488924: Bug#488924: dspam-webfrontend and apache2-suexec
Stefan Fritsch
sf at sfritsch.de
Fri Aug 15 16:32:24 UTC 2008
On Thursday 14 August 2008, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13 2008, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > dspam-webfrontend does not depend on apache2, it just suggests it
> > (via mod-perl). It should also suggest apache2-suexec. Will there
> > be an upload soon or should I do a NMU?
>
> I'm moving to a dependency on apache2-suexec. Is there a problem
> with doing so? The intent is to have the webfrontend work out of
> the box, but that depends on apache-specific configuration.
There is no problem with it. But if there are ways to use
dspam-webfrontend without apache (I don't know), a recommends would
be more appropriate and still make it work out of the box.
> Yes, I'm about ready to ask for an upload. If Matthijs isn't
> available I might ask you for help. An NMU isn't necessary and
> will just clog things up, I think. My changelog so far:
Lenny is frozen, the release team will never accept so many changes to
go into Lenny. This means there are two ways forward:
- Downgrade #488924 to non-RC severity, stay with 3.6.8-8.1 in Lenny,
go ahead with your upload that changes lots of things.
- Upload a new version with minimal changes fixing #488924 and
possibly some other important bugs. Wait for this new version to
migrate to lenny and delay the upload with big changes until later.
I recommend the second option, but this is not a strong opinion. Even
with the first option, it would make sense to delay the big upload,
in order to be sure that no newer version is required in lenny.
> The svn is at:
>
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-dspam
>
> If you'd like to try it. Further suggestions appreciated.
I can't comment since I don't know or use dspam. I just want to help
fixing a RC bug. If you need a sponsor to upload, ask.
Cheers,
Stefan
More information about the Pkg-dspam-misc
mailing list