[Pkg-electronics-devel] Remaining issues for geda-gaf

[أحمد المحمودي]

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:24:33AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Peter makes a good point - there is no use for a libgeda-dev package at
> all. We could consider this later if you want to keep it for now.

Shouldn't every library package have a devel package with it ? Just in 
case that some developer would need it maybe ?

> Similarly, libgedaXX.so.* could move into libgeda-common... but we would
> need to discuss this on debian-devel first I think because it would be
> a policy violation. Or perhaps not if it was in /usr/lib/<something>
> rather than directly in /usr/lib, but then we'd need to use RPATH..
> argh.

libgedaXX.so.* is a binary file (actually a binary & a symlink to it), 
so it can't be in the Arch: all libgeda-common.

Btw, there is one remaining issue in the package: although I do:

dh_makeshlibs -a -V'$(LIBPKG) (= $(DEBIAN_VERSION))

Yet the resulting binaries have this dependancy: libgeda38 (>= 1.6.0)

-- 
 ‎أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
  Digital design engineer
 GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 (@ subkeys.pgp.net)
 GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8  B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7