[Pkg-exim4-users] Re: Second try to define "virtual"

Tony Finch dot at dotat.at
Wed Feb 14 17:56:08 CET 2007


Marc Haber <mh+pkg-exim4-users at zugschlus.de> wrote:
>
>http://wiki.zugschlus.de/doku.php?id=definingvirtualforexim and tell

It seems pretty good to me. I've made a few minor edits, but I have a
suggestion for a more axiomatic/orthogonal approach.

* Does the domain use the traditional system aliases file, or its own
aliases file, or a shared (fully-qualified) aliases file, or none?

* Is email to this domain delivered locally? If so, are unix user names
valid local parts at this domain? Or is the message store independent
of unix accounts?

* If multiple domains point to the same message store, are local parts at
the various domains the same across all the domains or different?  Does
the same local part at different domains refer to different mailboxes?

* Is the domain supposed to be entirely equivalent to some other domain?

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
PLYMOUTH: NORTHWEST BACKING SOUTH 4 OR 5, INCREASING 6 TO GALE 8. SLIGHT OR
MODERATE INCREASING VERY ROUGH. FAIR. GOOD.



More information about the Pkg-exim4-users mailing list