[Pkg-exim4-users] exim4 and spamassassin?

[Jonathan Plews]

Quoting Marc Haber <mh+pkg-exim4-users at zugschlus.de>:

> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:13:20PM +0200, Lars Nielsen wrote:
>> Isn't sa-exim the "official" method to
>> use spamassasin in debian? Or is it more reliable to "hack" the
>> configurationfiles? Then I might as well install everything from source?
>
> These are three possibilities to do the job. Choose the one most
> suited for your needs.
>
> I have to violently object to calling configuring exim as "hacking the
> configuration files". These are _configuration_ _files_. They are
> _meant_ to be modified. Exim -Needs- to be configured, and the
> configuration files are the method to do so.
>
> Greetings
> Marc
>


Local acl files are an easy way to not modify the main template file,  
therefore avoiding dpkg asking you about overwrites.

-- 
Jonathan Plews - jonathan at plews.org.uk

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: PGP Digital Signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-exim4-users/attachments/20110519/54abd737/attachment.pgp>