[Pkg-fcoe-general] fcoe-utils in squeeze-backports

[Ritesh Raj Sarraf]

The fcoe-utils tools are currently in experimental. If you can test them
once, it'll be great. Then I can push them to unstable.

Does VirtualBox do pass-through for PCI devices?
Also, what target do you have? A software target or a hardware target.

Ritesh


On 11/21/2011 07:55 AM, Mike_Pennington at DELL.com wrote:
> Hi Ritesh,
> 
> Apologies for top-posting... I haven't taken the time to find the right settings in Outlook to properly >-quote replies...
> 
> I have an R710 with an Intel X520-T2 card; I believe it is supported in fcoe-utils.  I can certainly perform testing, although the optimal scenario would be that I have the test config in a VirtualBox... do you see a problem with that?
> 
> Thoughts?
> \m
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf [mailto:rrs at researchut.com] On Behalf Of Ritesh Raj Sarraf
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 1:26 AM
> To: Pennington, Mike
> Cc: pkg-fcoe-general at lists.alioth.debian.org
> Subject: Re: fcoe-utils in squeeze-backports
> 
> On 11/19/2011 12:55 AM, Mike_Pennington at DELL.com wrote:
>> I am rather interested in getting fcoe-utils into squeeze-backports... 
>> is there some work I could do to make this happen?
>>
>>  
>>
>> I must confess that I am not a Debian package maintainer (or even 
>> familiar with the process), but the functionality is important enough 
>> to my job and work group that I would not mind contributing what I can 
>> to assist.  If I may be of assistance, could someone provide a pointer 
>> to the steps required to get fcoe-utils into squeeze backports?
>>
>>  
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
> 
> 
> FCoE is not in any of the release yet. You'll see, it is only in the experimental archive. The reason being, I wasn't able to get access to the FCoE hardware for Debian, as I had hoped.
> 
> If you can help test with FCoE stack for Debian, I can work with you.
> Let me know.
> 
> For Squeeze, I don't think much can be done. This stack is not in Squeeze, so I'm not sure if the policy allows to push it to its backports. We can definitely do it for Wheezy.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System
> 


-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fcoe-general/attachments/20111121/63803d03/attachment.pgp>