[pkg-firebird-general] firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed

[Damyan Ivanov]

-=| marius adrian popa, Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:43:37AM -0400 |=-
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Damyan Ivanov <dmn at debian.org> wrote:
> > -=| marius adrian popa, Fri, May 08, 2009 at 01:33:44AM +0300 |=-
> >> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Damyan Ivanov <dmn at debian.org> wrote:
> >> > No -fno-stack-protector there.
> >>
> >> " It turns out that Ubuntu and Debian differ in their implementation
> >> in terms of using stack protection when building software. Debian’s
> >> default is “Do not use stack protection.” Ubuntu’s maintainers decided
> >> that stack protection was better even if things wouldn’t be completely
> >> compatible with Debian."
> >
> > So how come this user's firebird is compiled without stack protection?
> 
> the firebird packages is not compiled with stack

Why? You just said that Ubuntu uses stack protector by default. So the 
Ubuntu package shall use it, no?

> just the users UDF is compiled by default
> 
> it's just needs to be mentioned to UDF users on ubuntu and other stack
> protected os-es

Mentioned where?

-- 
dam