r59 - /packages/swfmill/trunk/debian/copyright

baby-guest at users.alioth.debian.org baby-guest at users.alioth.debian.org
Mon Apr 30 17:04:29 UTC 2007


Author: baby-guest
Date: Mon Apr 30 17:04:28 2007
New Revision: 59

URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-flash/?sc=1&rev=59
Log:
License change


Modified:
    packages/swfmill/trunk/debian/copyright

Modified: packages/swfmill/trunk/debian/copyright
URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-flash/packages/swfmill/trunk/debian/copyright?rev=59&op=diff
==============================================================================
--- packages/swfmill/trunk/debian/copyright (original)
+++ packages/swfmill/trunk/debian/copyright Mon Apr 30 17:04:28 2007
@@ -31,6 +31,40 @@
 On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General
 Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
 
+
+The files src/swft/readpng.c and src/swft/readpng.h are:
+
+  Copyright (c) 1998-2000 Greg Roelofs
+
+Even though those files appear licensed with a BSD-like license with an
+announcement clause, we have explicit permission from the author to use a
+dual-license for them:
+
+From: "Greg Roelofs" <newt at pobox.com>
+To: "Daniel Fischer" <dan at subsignal.org>, "Miriam Ruiz" <little_miry at yahoo.es>
+Topic: "Re: readpng"
+CC: "glennrp at comcast.net"
+
+   Thank you both for your quick replies.  I have no interest in being petty
+   about this--and I've already been leaning toward copyleft licensing in my
+   other projects over the last few years--so I've decided to go ahead and
+   dual-license the pngbook code (readpng{,2}, writepng, rpng{,2}-{x,win},
+   wpng) under the GNU GPL v2 or later.  You may take this message as explicit
+   permission insofar as it's likely to be a while before I actually get around
+   to releasing a new version of the code--I'm working on XV right now and have
+   pngcheck and a couple others queued up next.  (I'll do my best to do so be-
+   fore the next version of libpng goes out, however, so the contrib code can
+   be updated at the same time.)
+
+   I'm fine with the current change applying to the old code, too; I know
+   how revision-control systems work, and it's basically not possible (or
+   desirable) to "go back in time" and muck with things in there.  I guess
+   you could add some sort of notice in or around the download tarballs (or,
+   if you have separately tagged branches, add it as a new file in the old
+   branches)--I leave that up to you.
+
+On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General
+Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
 
 
 The documentation was downloaded from:




More information about the pkg-flash-devel mailing list