[Pkg-fonts-devel] Packaging OTF fonts

Vasudev Kamath kamathvasudev at gmail.com
Mon Jan 31 03:45:07 UTC 2011


Thanks . So should I rename the ITP package name as fonts-induni?

Thanks and Regards

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Eremit7 <eremit7 at gmx.de> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Am 29.01.2011 17:13, schrieb Hideki Yamane:
> > On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:58:35 +0530
> > Vasudev Kamath <kamathvasudev at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> My doubt is whether OTF fonts are packaged in same way as TTF or is
> there a
> >> separate policy for them?
> >
> >  From now on, new font package name should be font-* as same as fedora,
> >  right?
> >
> Hello,
>
> the new name scheme was fonts-* (with plural s) if I remember correctly.
>
> greetings
>
> Eremit7
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk1Fu04ACgkQ3XJauU8JqNlRagCfe3EKCGPSOG8YYvy4ZxObV1Lg
> 5l4An1kSMOsPxx/UwCnPu1xrSEMSZYmf
> =pRVp
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list
> Pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-fonts-devel
>



-- 

Vasudev Kamath
http://vasudevkamath.blogspot.com
http://identi.ca/vasudev
http://twitter.com/vasudevkamath
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20110131/26bd53bb/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list