[Pkg-fonts-devel] "foundry" part is ? (Re: Font packages renaming mini-HOWTO?)
bubulle at debian.org
Sun Jun 19 05:09:47 UTC 2011
Quoting Hideki Yamane (henrich at debian.or.jp):
> Hi all,
> On Thu, 5 May 2011 06:28:43 +0200
> Christian PERRIER <bubulle at debian.org> wrote:
> > This is good as I think we reached some kind of consensus with last
> > proposals, assuming the "foundry" part is considered to be optional.
> Any conclusion?
> a. to be optional
> b. should not be present at all unless there are multiple packages with the same name
> c. other
I'd vote for a., as a "should"
Something like "When a foundry or font author provides several fonts
that are packaged separately, package names should include the
foundry (or author's) name before the font name:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel