[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#648779: [PATCH] added new homepage for upstream

[Francesca Ciceri]

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 07:43:27AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Paul Wise (pabs at debian.org):
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi, here's the patch for the changed upstream homepage. I didn't now if
> > > it was ok for me to directly commit in the repo, so I'll just leave it
> > > here :).
> > ...
> > > -Homepage: http://perso.orange.fr/jm.douteau/
> > > +Homepage: http://douteau.ecolier.perso.sfr.fr/
> > 
> > Please commit, the first link is dead and the second one works.
> > 
> > I'd say when in doubt, commit, there is nothing we cannot git revert :)
> 
> I was about to write the exact same things...:-)
> 
> /me, happy to see bugs being cleaned out...
> 


Ok done! :)

Also, to clarify: so when patches are this trivial it's ok for me to
just commit them directly in the repo if the package is maintained under
the pkg-fonts umbrella? Without asking the main maintainer/uploader?
I really don't want to step on someone else's toes :).

And another doubt: do I need to add an entry in the changelog each time
I commit a patch (and/or change something) or is this something will be
take care when preparing the next release?
Also: does it make sense to add a changelog entry for such trivial changes?

Sorry but I haven't really gotten the hang of the changelogs yet :)

Thanks,
Francesca
-- 
"Nessuna conquista è per sempre. C'è sempre qualcuno che è
interessato a toglierla. Per cui resistere non è solo un 
dovere, ma una necessità dei giovani, altrimenti non si 
va avanti!"
Maria Cervi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20140515/c633ff0f/attachment.sig>