From neustoima at promooffer.eu Tue Sep 1 00:41:11 2015 From: neustoima at promooffer.eu (=?UTF-8?B?TmV1c3RvaW1hLmJnIC0g0KHQtdC60YHQuCDQsdC10LvRjNC+INC4INC00YDQtdGF0Lg=?=) Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 03:41:11 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0KDQsNC30L/QsNC70LXRgtC1INGB0YLRgNCw?= =?utf-8?b?0YHRgtC40YLQtSDRgdGK0YEg0L3QsNGI0LjRgtC1INGB0LXQutGB0Lgg?= =?utf-8?b?0Lgg0LXRgNC+0YLQuNGH0L3QuCDQv9GA0LXQtNC70L7QttC10L3QuNGP?= =?utf-8?q?!?= Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From martinerikwerner at gmail.com Tue Sep 1 08:55:21 2015 From: martinerikwerner at gmail.com (martinerikwerner at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 01:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: sfd files for Play font Message-ID: <2b41dc81-eafa-4e57-a184-b144f399bb2f@googlegroups.com> Hi, I'm maintaining the Play font in Debian, which currently builds the Play font from the sfd sources (attached) which was present in the google code repository. And I've been trying to figure out a bug[0] where the sfd files generate a rather different font than the ttf files provided by google webfonts. First, I noticed that the sfd files are now gone with the move to GitHub, does this mean that the ttf files would be considered the canonical source for the font? Second, I have a few fixes that I've applied as a patch (attached) to the sfd files, to fix intersection, naming, and integral points, which still seems to be relevant for the current ttf files as well? Lastly, and the main point, is there any specifics on how to generate the ttf files from sfd sources to make sure they are as similar to the google web fonts ttf:s as possible? [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776273 (cc:ed with this post) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fabian at debian.org Tue Sep 1 09:37:58 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 11:37:58 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: Bug#776273: sfd files for Play font In-Reply-To: <2b41dc81-eafa-4e57-a184-b144f399bb2f@googlegroups.com> References: <2b41dc81-eafa-4e57-a184-b144f399bb2f@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <1441100278.1408.41.camel@debian.org> Hi, Am Dienstag, den 01.09.2015, 01:55 -0700 schrieb martinerikwerner at gmail.com: > First, I noticed that the sfd files are now gone with the move to > GitHub, does this mean that the ttf files would be considered the > canonical source for the font? most probably, yes. Please note that the .sfd file format has never been the canonical source format for fonts, it is just the native file format for fontforge. People working on fonts with any other software will probably never get in contact with such files. Also, once the fonts are loaded into fontforge, the underlying file format becomes irrelevant. The big advantage is that .sfd files are ASCII files that can get patched by usual means, this advantage gets lost with the switch to binary formats such as .ttf or .otf. Compare to the situation of graphics files in .png and .ppm formats. Both formats may represent the same picture, both are editable with common tools. The one is an ASCII file that can be patched, the other isn't. But you cannot tell which one is the *canonical* format. > Lastly, and the main point, is there any specifics on how to generate > the ttf files from sfd sources to make sure they are as similar to > the google web fonts ttf:s as possible? This is up to upstream to tell you, just as upstream for software usually provides a build system or at least a simple Makefile. For example, for fonts-tuffy no such information is available and I am using a generic conversion script that I have found on the fontforge website: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-fonts/fonts-tuffy.git/tree/debian/scripts/convert.pe For fonts-liberation, upstream has included a conversion script and a Makefile: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-fonts/fonts-liberation.git/tree/scripts/fontexport.pe For fonts-cantarell, upstream has included a conversion script and an autotools-based build system: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-fonts/fonts-cantarell.git/tree/scripts/generate.sh You see, there is not really a golden rule for building .ttf files from .sfd files. EIther upstream provides you with a specified set of rules or you have to guess best and maybe use a generic script. Cheers, Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From wdg at debian.org Tue Sep 1 11:00:58 2015 From: wdg at debian.org (Daniel Glassey) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 12:00:58 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] ITP: fonts-hack -- Typeface designed for source code Message-ID: <20150901110058.GA10267@meegopad-debian.dazedgeek.com> > * Package name : fonts-hack > Version : 2.010 > Upstream Author : Christopher Simpkins > * URL : https://github.com/chrissimpkins/Hack > * License : Modified SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1 > Programming Lang: > Description : Typeface designed for source code > > Package description: > > No frills. No gimmicks. Hack is hand groomed and optically balanced to be a > workhorse face for code. > It has deep roots in the libre, open source typeface community and expands upon > the contributions of the Bitstream Vera & DejaVu projects. The face has been > re-designed with a larger glyph set, modifications of the original glyph shapes > (including distinct point styles and semi-bold punctuation weight in the > regular set to make analphabetic characters less transparent), and meticulous > attention to metrics (including numerous spacing adjustments to improve the > rhythm of the face and the legibility of code at small text sizes). The large > x-height + wide aperture + low contrast design combined with PostScript > hinting/hint replacement programs and a TrueType instruction set make it highly > legible at commonly used source code text sizes with a sweet spot that runs in > the 8px - 12px range on modern desktop and laptop monitors. > > After several years using Debian I feel it's time to give something back to the > community. I'd like to maintain a package for my favourite monospace font. I > use it as my terminal font, so I'll be very aware of the package status and > quality. > > Paride Hi, Great :) When you upload it to mentors.debian.net email pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org and hopefully someone will sponsor it. Regards, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From hernan.guevara at proavance.net Tue Sep 1 11:47:49 2015 From: hernan.guevara at proavance.net (DHL Shipment) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:47:49 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] DHL AWB# 34 5673 0015 / shipment Message-ID: <4a5545$ld2vs@mx.andorra.ad> Dear customer, The following 1 piece(s) have been sent by a Customer via DHL Express dated 01/09/2015 with AWB# 34 5673 0015 Find attached Scanned copy of the shipping documents and more information about the parcel and confirm if the address is correct for shipment. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Documents.zip Type: application/x-zip-compressed Size: 1052915 bytes Desc: not available URL: From noreply at release.debian.org Tue Sep 1 16:39:13 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 16:39:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] birdfont 2.11.2-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the birdfont source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.10.5-3 Current version: 2.11.2-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Tue Sep 1 16:39:13 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 16:39:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sawarabi-mincho 20150815-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the fonts-sawarabi-mincho source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 20150715-1 Current version: 20150815-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From pl at ninthfloor.org Tue Sep 1 18:58:57 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 20:58:57 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package Message-ID: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> Dear all, I just uploaded my fonts-hack package to mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fonts-hack and in the ITP Bug#797627 I've been suggested to write here to look for a sponsor. It is very simple, but it is my first real attempt to produce a Debian package acceptable for the official repository, so it's probably not perfect. I hope there will me not to much to correct. Please note that I didn't subscribe to the list, so please Cc: me. Thanks! Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From tbm at mailoffer.biz Wed Sep 2 00:07:09 2015 From: tbm at mailoffer.biz (TBM Consulting) Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 03:07:09 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0KHQtdC80LjQvdCw0YDQuDog0J7QsdGJ0LU=?= =?utf-8?b?0YHRgtCy0LXQvdC4INC/0L7RgNGK0YfQutC4LCDQldCy0YDQvtC/0LU=?= =?utf-8?b?0LnRgdC60Lgg0L/RgNC+0LXQutGC0LgsINCh0JjQlNCU0J4sINCT0L4=?= =?utf-8?b?0LTQuNGI0L3QviDQv9GA0LjQutC70Y7Rh9Cy0LDQvdC1LCDQodC+0YY=?= =?utf-8?b?0LjQsNC70L3QviDQuCDQotGA0YPQtNC+0LLQviDQt9Cw0LrQvtC90L4=?= =?utf-8?b?0LTQsNGC0LXQu9GB0YLQstC+LSAyMDE1INCz?= Message-ID: <6c5ef2151656f1dd35f8893d47a9c42a@statsystem.eu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fedorkude00 at autorambler.ru Wed Sep 2 12:36:34 2015 From: fedorkude00 at autorambler.ru (=?windows-1251?B?yvPh+/jq6O0gwO3g8fLg8ej/?=) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:36:34 +0400 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?cp1251?b?wO3g8fLg8ej/IMrz4fv46ujtIO7x8uDi6Ovg?= =?cp1251?b?IMJh7CAxIOvo9+1vZSDxb+7h+eXt6OU=?= Message-ID: fac?book ????????? ???????? ???: ????????? ????????? ?? ?????? ???? ????????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ????! ??? ???????: ???? ??????? ? ??? ???? ????? ????????.. ????? ????? ??????, ? ? ???? ??? ?????????! ???? ?? ?????????? ?? ???????.. $1000 ????? ????????? ???? ?????????? ?? pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org. ???? ?? ?? ?????? ???????? ??? ??. ?????? ?? Facebook, ???? ???? ?? ?? ??????, ????? ??? ????? ????????????? ??? ???????? ???????????? ??????, ??????????, ?????????? ?? ????????. Facebook, Inc., Attention: Department 6393, PO Box 34717, Palo Alto, CA 613986 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dave at lab6.com Wed Sep 2 17:49:33 2015 From: dave at lab6.com (Dave Crossland) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font In-Reply-To: <2b41dc81-eafa-4e57-a184-b144f399bb2f@googlegroups.com> References: <2b41dc81-eafa-4e57-a184-b144f399bb2f@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: Hi On 1 September 2015 at 04:55, wrote: > Hi, > > I'm maintaining the Play font in Debian, which currently builds the Play > font from the sfd sources (attached) which was present in the google code > repository. And I've been trying to figure out a bug[0] where the sfd files > generate a rather different font than the ttf files provided by google > webfonts. > > First, I noticed that the sfd files are now gone with the move to GitHub, > does this mean that the ttf files would be considered the canonical source > for the font? > All the source files there not available elsewhere will resurface in github.com/googlefonts/ soon :) > Second, I have a few fixes that I've applied as a patch (attached) to the > sfd files, to fix intersection, naming, and integral points, which still > seems to be relevant for the current ttf files as well? > Sadly the RFN is a problem here. The guy who did this, Jonas Hecksher, left the PlayTypes foundry, so it is de facto abandoned. And the RFN - https://github.com/google/fonts/blob/master/ofl/play/OFL.txt#L2 - means how to move forwards is tricky. BTW I believe that Debian must rename all OFL-RFN fonts (just as with Firefox.) Another good reason why I strongly recommend against RFNs! > Lastly, and the main point, is there any specifics on how to generate the > ttf files from sfd sources to make sure they are as similar to the google > web fonts ttf:s as possible? > The *-TTF.sfd files were the exact TTFs in SFD format, so generating them more or less directly should do that; the export would need a few 'default' flags, like this: https://github.com/ManufacturaInd/tinytypetools/blob/master/fontconvert/fontconvert#L131 -- Cheers Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fabian at debian.org Thu Sep 3 04:45:04 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 06:45:04 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> Hi Paride, Am Dienstag, den 01.09.2015, 20:58 +0200 schrieb Paride Legovini: > and in the ITP Bug#797627 I've been suggested to write here to look for > a sponsor. It is very simple, but it is my first real attempt to produce > a Debian package acceptable for the official repository, so it's > probably not perfect. I hope there will me not to much to correct. well then, let's see. ;) debian/control: * The Vcs-* fields are meant to point to the packaging repository, not the upstream repository. Please move the upstream homepage from the Vcs-Browser field to the Source field in debian/copyright. debian/copyright: * Your upstream sources do not contain any documentation of the copyright and License. This is very bad, please convince your upstream of including such a file. Alternatively, there are chances that these information are embedded into the font files and can be extracted, see e.g. http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-fonts/fonts-croscore.git/tree/debian/copyright http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-fonts/fonts-crosextra-caladea.git/tree/debian/copyright Anyway, please document where you got the idea for the Copyright and License fields from . ;) * As mentioned before, the Source field should point to the website where you have downloaded the sources, e.g. the Releases page on Github. * The blank line before the License paragraph breaks parsing of this file. Please do either remove this line or duplicate it right below the Copyright line. * There is no Copyright/License information given for debian/*. Please chose a simple license such as e.g. https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Other-Files.html debian/dirs: * Not needed, please remove. debian/docs: * Empty, please remove. debian/README.source: * Not needed, please remove. debian/rules: * Only lines 1, 21 and 22 are needed, please remove the others. debian/watch: * Missing, please consider adding this file. So, that's it so far for my review. Cheers, Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From pabs at debian.org Thu Sep 3 07:34:37 2015 From: pabs at debian.org (Paul Wise) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 09:34:37 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#797627: ITP: fonts-hack -- Typeface designed for source code In-Reply-To: <20150831230524.31396.99201.reportbug@mandragola> References: <20150831230524.31396.99201.reportbug@mandragola> Message-ID: On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Paride Legovini wrote: > * URL : https://github.com/chrissimpkins/Hack > Description : Typeface designed for source code Upstream has clearly defined source in UFO format but doesn't appear to have a clearly defined build process, please talk to them about creating an automatic build process that can be run everywhere, including Linux distributions. I note that the tools directory contains embedded copies of unicode-data and parts of fonttools 2.5. The latter is not yet in Debian so upstream's build process probably will need it and fonttools probably needs to be updated in Debian before we will be able to have this font in main. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise From pl at ninthfloor.org Thu Sep 3 12:27:39 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:27:39 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> Hi Fabian, thank you very much for you review, I am preparing a new version of the package, I'll probably upload it to mentors later today. On 2015-09-03 06:45, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > debian/copyright: > * Your upstream sources do not contain any documentation of the > copyright and License. This is very bad, please convince your > upstream of including such a file. Here I'm not sure about what to do. The upstream distribution is a .zip file with just the .ttf files, I manually repackaged this into the .orig.tar.xz package, and here I'm already unsure if this way to proceed is correct. It's true that the upstream .zip does not contain a license file, but the git repository does, and it's where I took what I put in the debian/copyright file. Should I manually add this file to the .orig archive? Or should I add a note about where to find this file? The file is written in Markdown, it's very legible. Is it plain enough to be directly included? If it is, I could also easily include the upstream changelog, that is in the same format. Let me know and thank you again. Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From pl at ninthfloor.org Thu Sep 3 12:33:25 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:33:25 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#797627: ITP: fonts-hack -- Typeface designed for source code In-Reply-To: References: <20150831230524.31396.99201.reportbug@mandragola> Message-ID: <55E83E15.6000406@ninthfloor.org> Dear Paul, On 2015-09-03 09:34, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Paride Legovini wrote: > >> * URL : https://github.com/chrissimpkins/Hack >> Description : Typeface designed for source code > > Upstream has clearly defined source in UFO format but doesn't appear > to have a clearly defined build process, please talk to them about > creating an automatic build process that can be run everywhere, > including Linux distributions. Will do, I'm also interested in this, but is it a necessary step to have the font included in main? I see that other fonts (e.g. inconsolata) just distribute the otf/ttf files. Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From fabian at debian.org Thu Sep 3 13:11:11 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 15:11:11 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <1441285871.16433.13.camel@debian.org> Hi Paride, Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2015, 14:27 +0200 schrieb Paride Legovini: > Here I'm not sure about what to do. The upstream distribution is a .zip > file with just the .ttf files, I manually repackaged this into the > .orig.tar.xz package, and here I'm already unsure if this way to proceed > is correct. this should be alright. > It's true that the upstream .zip does not contain a license file, but > the git repository does, and it's where I took what I put in the > debian/copyright file. Should I manually add this file to the .orig > archive? Or should I add a note about where to find this file? It should be reproducible where you found the license. Regarding including the license texts in the tarball, the SIL license is more explicit about this in ?2, but the Bitstream license just states: The above copyright and trademark notices and this permission notice shall be included in all copies of one or more of the Font Software typefaces. I guess it depends on what is regarded as "copy", since the binary .ttf files themselves have the license texts embedded, but I'd rather go for sure. Cheers, Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fabian at debian.org Thu Sep 3 13:39:34 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 15:39:34 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2015, 14:27 +0200 schrieb Paride Legovini: > Here I'm not sure about what to do. The upstream distribution is a > .zip file with just the .ttf files, I manually repackaged this into the > .orig.tar.xz package, and here I'm already unsure if this way to proceed > is correct. This page https://github.com/chrissimpkins/Hack/releases provides a "Source Code (tar.gz)" link which points to this file https://github.com/chrissimpkins/Hack/archive/v2.010.tar.gz which in turn contains everything that you need, including license and changelog and .ttf files in a brebuild/ directory. Please, use this. ;) - Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fabian at debian.org Thu Sep 3 13:47:56 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 15:47:56 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2015, 15:39 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: > changelog and .ttf files in a brebuild/ directory. Sorry, it's the build/ directory. I have no idea what's the difference to the prebuild/ directory, though, maybe some step in the building process. And, please, consider packaging the .otf font instead! Thanks, - Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From pl at ninthfloor.org Thu Sep 3 14:11:06 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:11:06 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> On 2015-09-03 15:47, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2015, 15:39 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: >> changelog and .ttf files in a brebuild/ directory. > > Sorry, it's the build/ directory. I have no idea what's the difference > to the prebuild/ directory, though, maybe some step in the building > process. > > And, please, consider packaging the .otf font instead! I tried the .otf font first, and I found it very bad. After this I found out the on Linux system the the .ttf version is recommended, and indeed the result is much, mych better. The README says: "The .ttf files are recommended for screen use on Linux and Windows platforms." If I'm missing something here let me know. Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From fabian at debian.org Thu Sep 3 14:30:57 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:30:57 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <1441290657.18526.1.camel@debian.org> Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2015, 16:11 +0200 schrieb Paride Legovini: > If I'm missing something here let me know. I don't think so. If you have tested the .otf variant and prefer the .ttf one, this is fine. I just wanted to make sure you *considered* packaging the .otf variant, which you did. ;) - Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From dr at jones.dk Thu Sep 3 16:00:17 2015 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 18:00:17 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <20150903160017.2889.1819@auryn.jones.dk> Quoting Paride Legovini (2015-09-03 16:11:06) > On 2015-09-03 15:47, Fabian Greffrath wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2015, 15:39 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: >>> changelog and .ttf files in a brebuild/ directory. >> >> Sorry, it's the build/ directory. I have no idea what's the >> difference to the prebuild/ directory, though, maybe some step in the >> building process. >> >> And, please, consider packaging the .otf font instead! > > I tried the .otf font first, and I found it very bad. After this I > found out the on Linux system the the .ttf version is recommended, and > indeed the result is much, mych better. The README says: "The .ttf > files are recommended for screen use on Linux and Windows platforms." Maybe these Opentype fonts really are in worse shape? than the Truetype counterparts, but more likely the recommendation (and your tests?) relate to application support for the font formats: Applications vary widely in how they render fonts. Kerning: Scribus until ~1.3.6 (or maybe later) ignored kerning data when rendering Opentype fonts: http://bugs.scribus.net/view.php?id=7910 Featues: Inkscape does not support Opentype "features", accessible (clumsily but working) in Truetype as separate families (e.g. Oldstyle figures): https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/1386778 'locl' feature: Noto CJK fonts are huge but nevertheless are provided upstream in several Opentype and Truetype encodings, due to varying issues with handling them, one being that some applications cannot tell the font renderer which flavor (Opentype "locl" feature) to pick from a multi-flavored CJK font: https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/cjk/ Therefore: Please consider sharing which tests you made using which applications, so that we can try identify whether Opentype fonts or rendering is the actual issue here. - Jonas ? Literally ;-) -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: signature URL: From noreply at release.debian.org Thu Sep 3 16:39:18 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:39:18 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] 3270font 1.2.3-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the 3270font source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.2-1 Current version: 1.2.3-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From pl at ninthfloor.org Thu Sep 3 19:01:29 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 21:01:29 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <55E89909.4000903@ninthfloor.org> Dear Fabian, I just uploaded to mentors a much improved version of the package, let me know what you think of it. Cheers, Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From dr at jones.dk Thu Sep 3 20:31:41 2015 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 22:31:41 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <20150903203141.2889.30410@auryn.jones.dk> [reposted, cc Paride] @Paride: Please consider subscribe to the mailinglist :-) Quoting Paride Legovini (2015-09-03 16:11:06) > On 2015-09-03 15:47, Fabian Greffrath wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2015, 15:39 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: >>> changelog and .ttf files in a brebuild/ directory. >> >> Sorry, it's the build/ directory. I have no idea what's the >> difference to the prebuild/ directory, though, maybe some step in the >> building process. >> >> And, please, consider packaging the .otf font instead! > > I tried the .otf font first, and I found it very bad. After this I > found out the on Linux system the the .ttf version is recommended, and > indeed the result is much, mych better. The README says: "The .ttf > files are recommended for screen use on Linux and Windows platforms." Maybe these Opentype fonts really are in worse shape? than the Truetype counterparts, but more likely the recommendation (and your tests?) relate to application support for the font formats: Applications vary widely in how they render fonts. Kerning: Scribus until ~1.3.6 (or maybe later) ignored kerning data when rendering Opentype fonts: http://bugs.scribus.net/view.php?id=7910 Featues: Inkscape does not support Opentype "features", accessible (clumsily but working) in Truetype as separate families (e.g. Oldstyle figures): https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/1386778 'locl' feature: Noto CJK fonts are huge but nevertheless are provided upstream in several Opentype and Truetype encodings, due to varying issues with handling them, one being that some applications cannot tell the font renderer which flavor (Opentype "locl" feature) to pick from a multi-flavored CJK font: https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/cjk/ Therefore: Please consider sharing which tests you made using which applications, so that we can try identify whether Opentype fonts or rendering is the actual issue here. - Jonas ? Literally ;-) -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: signature URL: From pl at ninthfloor.org Thu Sep 3 20:54:33 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 22:54:33 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <20150903203141.2889.30410@auryn.jones.dk> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> <20150903203141.2889.30410@auryn.jones.dk> Message-ID: <55E8B389.3020205@ninthfloor.org> Dear Jonas, thanks for your feedback, I am now subscribed to the mailing list. On 2015-09-03 22:31, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Paride Legovini (2015-09-03 16:11:06) >> >> I tried the .otf font first, and I found it very bad. After this I >> found out the on Linux system the the .ttf version is recommended, and >> indeed the result is much, mych better. The README says: "The .ttf >> files are recommended for screen use on Linux and Windows platforms." > > Maybe these Opentype fonts really are in worse shape? than the Truetype > counterparts, but more likely the recommendation (and your tests?) > relate to application support for the font formats: Applications vary > widely in how they render fonts. [...] > Therefore: Please consider sharing which tests you made using which > applications, so that we can try identify whether Opentype fonts or > rendering is the actual issue here. Well, I tested the font where I intend to mostly use it: in my terminal. The terminal is sakura, it's a VTE based GTK3 terminal. Check the two attached files, it's apparent that otf version gives a result that is by far worse. Check especially the bold 'm' letter, the dollar symbol and the dot inside of the '0' character. In case it matters, I chose the native hinting method in when configuring fontconfig-config. I'm very willing to investigate the issue, I hope I'll end packaging the best version of this font. Cheers, Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: otf_test.png Type: image/png Size: 20204 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ttf_test.png Type: image/png Size: 23218 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From dr at jones.dk Thu Sep 3 22:24:38 2015 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:24:38 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E8B389.3020205@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> <20150903203141.2889.30410@auryn.jones.dk> <55E8B389.3020205@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <20150903222438.2889.19182@auryn.jones.dk> Quoting Paride Legovini (2015-09-03 22:54:33) > thanks for your feedback, I am now subscribed to the mailing list. Excellent :-) > On 2015-09-03 22:31, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting Paride Legovini (2015-09-03 16:11:06) >>> I tried the .otf font first, and I found it very bad. After this I >>> found out the on Linux system the the .ttf version is recommended, >>> and indeed the result is much, mych better. The README says: "The >>> .ttf files are recommended for screen use on Linux and Windows >>> platforms." >> >> Maybe these Opentype fonts really are in worse shape? than the >> Truetype counterparts, but more likely the recommendation (and your >> tests?) relate to application support for the font formats: >> Applications vary widely in how they render fonts. > [...] > >> Therefore: Please consider sharing which tests you made using which >> applications, so that we can try identify whether Opentype fonts or >> rendering is the actual issue here. > > Well, I tested the font where I intend to mostly use it: in my > terminal. The terminal is sakura, it's a VTE based GTK3 terminal. > > Check the two attached files, it's apparent that otf version gives a > result that is by far worse. Check especially the bold 'm' letter, the > dollar symbol and the dot inside of the '0' character. > > In case it matters, I chose the native hinting method in when > configuring fontconfig-config. > > I'm very willing to investigate the issue, I hope I'll end packaging > the best version of this font. It seems from the git history that they were intended to be identical. Perhaps share your finding with upstream - it might be a bug there. If Opentype fonts render best for some apps and Truetype renders best for others, it is probably best to package both, like fonts-freefont-*. ...and package the embedded opentype, SVG and Woff in package *-web stored in separate dirs as was recently discussed here on the list. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: signature URL: From preining at logic.at Thu Sep 3 22:49:38 2015 From: preining at logic.at (Norbert Preining) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 07:49:38 +0900 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E8B389.3020205@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> <20150903203141.2889.30410@auryn.jones.dk> <55E8B389.3020205@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <20150903224938.GR20127@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> Hi Paride, > Check the two attached files, it's apparent that otf version gives a > result that is by far worse. Check especially the bold 'm' letter, the > dollar symbol and the dot inside of the '0' character. Hi everyone. Just one code point: I have installed the OTF fonts (outside packaging) and have them running in roxterm, and I don't see the artefacts that are indeed clearly visible in the screenshots. I tried a few font sizes, and couldn't find the same issue. Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From unionw539 at gmail.com Fri Sep 4 04:29:46 2015 From: unionw539 at gmail.com (COMPENSATION HEAD OFFICE) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:29:46 +0900 (JST) Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] compensation Message-ID: <338635.18037.qm@web101615.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> ? Contact us for your compensation consignment box -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pabs at debian.org Fri Sep 4 06:51:12 2015 From: pabs at debian.org (Paul Wise) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:51:12 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#797627: ITP: fonts-hack -- Typeface designed for source code In-Reply-To: <55E83E15.6000406@ninthfloor.org> References: <20150831230524.31396.99201.reportbug@mandragola> <55E83E15.6000406@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Paride Legovini wrote: > but is it a necessary step to have the font included in main? Personally I wouldn't upload it to main without fixing that > I see that other fonts (e.g. inconsolata) just distribute the otf/ttf files. For some fonts there is no reproducible build process, for other fonts folks might have been a bit lax. Not sure about Inconsolata. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise From fabian at debian.org Fri Sep 4 07:05:21 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 09:05:21 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E89909.4000903@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E89909.4000903@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <1441350321.23703.7.camel@debian.org> Hi Paride, Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2015, 21:01 +0200 schrieb Paride Legovini: > me know what you think of it. very good! In debian/copyright the line above "Files: debian/*" is not empty, it contains a blank. Not sure if this disturbs parsing, I would simply remove it. Also the trailing white space in debian/rules. Apart from these nitpicks, I'd say the package is ready technically. Good job, Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From pl at ninthfloor.org Fri Sep 4 08:31:10 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:31:10 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <20150903224938.GR20127@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> <20150903203141.2889.30410@auryn.jones.dk> <55E8B389.3020205@ninthfloor.org> <20150903224938.GR20127@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> Message-ID: <55E956CE.4060404@ninthfloor.org> Hi Norbert, Thanks for the feedback, it's very appreciated. On 2015-09-04 00:49, Norbert Preining wrote: >> Check the two attached files, it's apparent that otf version gives a >> result that is by far worse. Check especially the bold 'm' letter, the >> dollar symbol and the dot inside of the '0' character. > > Hi everyone. Just one code point: I have installed the OTF fonts > (outside packaging) and have them running in roxterm, and I don't > see the artefacts that are indeed clearly visible in the screenshots. I will investigate and report back, but I'm quite sure that I didn't change anything relevant in my font configuration. I have a couple of questions that might help. Do the ttf/otf fonts look identical to you, or you don't get the artifacts but the fonts do differ? Are you using native hinting or autohinting? Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From pl at ninthfloor.org Fri Sep 4 08:48:03 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:48:03 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <1441350321.23703.7.camel@debian.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E89909.4000903@ninthfloor.org> <1441350321.23703.7.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <55E95AC3.4020802@ninthfloor.org> On 2015-09-04 09:05, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Hi Paride, > > Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2015, 21:01 +0200 schrieb Paride Legovini: >> me know what you think of it. > > very good! Thanks Fabian, I'll submit an upgraded package once the otf/ttf issue is settled. Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From pl at ninthfloor.org Fri Sep 4 08:52:24 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:52:24 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#797627: ITP: fonts-hack -- Typeface designed for source code In-Reply-To: References: <20150831230524.31396.99201.reportbug@mandragola> <55E83E15.6000406@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <55E95BC8.8070907@ninthfloor.org> On 2015-09-04 08:51, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Paride Legovini wrote: > >> but is it a necessary step to have the font included in main? > > Personally I wouldn't upload it to main without fixing that I will discuss this upstream, but first I want to understand what's the point with the ttf/otf versions. Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From dr at jones.dk Fri Sep 4 11:33:00 2015 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 13:33:00 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E956CE.4060404@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> <20150903203141.2889.30410@auryn.jones.dk> <55E8B389.3020205@ninthfloor.org> <20150903224938.GR20127@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <55E956CE.4060404@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <20150904113300.2889.46487@auryn.jones.dk> Quoting Paride Legovini (2015-09-04 10:31:10) > On 2015-09-04 00:49, Norbert Preining wrote: >>> Check the two attached files, it's apparent that otf version gives a >>> result that is by far worse. Check especially the bold 'm' letter, >>> the dollar symbol and the dot inside of the '0' character. >> >> Hi everyone. Just one code point: I have installed the OTF fonts >> (outside packaging) and have them running in roxterm, and I don't see >> the artefacts that are indeed clearly visible in the screenshots. > > I will investigate and report back, but I'm quite sure that I didn't > change anything relevant in my font configuration. > > I have a couple of questions that might help. > > Do the ttf/otf fonts look identical to you, or you don't get the > artifacts but the fonts do differ? I get similar differences as you when I use the font with sakura. (For console use I prefer fast rendering and low memory footprint, so use xfonts-terminus with rxvt-unicode-lite). Attached are ghostscript renderings of the two main fonts using this command: printf '%%!PS\n(/usr/share/ghostscript/9.16/lib/prfont.ps) run\n/Hack DoFont\n' | gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=Hack.pdf - I cannot see any difference (command is relatively noisy and I checked that it loaded the correct font file). A quick sample in XeLaTeX also didn't show differences. > Are you using native hinting or autohinting? I believe the hinters are relevant for screen rendering only. I still recommend to package both Truetype and Opentype fonts - and also web fonts, since upstream provides those as well. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Hack.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 648299 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Hack.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1170617 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: signature URL: From pl at ninthfloor.org Fri Sep 4 11:59:04 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:59:04 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <20150904113300.2889.46487@auryn.jones.dk> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E83CBB.2060402@ninthfloor.org> <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> <20150903203141.2889.30410@auryn.jones.dk> <55E8B389.3020205@ninthfloor.org> <20150903224938.GR20127@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <55E956CE.4060404@ninthfloor.org> <20150904113300.2889.46487@auryn.jones.dk> Message-ID: <55E98788.5050305@ninthfloor.org> On 2015-09-04 13:33, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Paride Legovini (2015-09-04 10:31:10) >> On 2015-09-04 00:49, Norbert Preining wrote: >>>> Check the two attached files, it's apparent that otf version gives a >>>> result that is by far worse. Check especially the bold 'm' letter, >>>> the dollar symbol and the dot inside of the '0' character. >>> >>> Hi everyone. Just one code point: I have installed the OTF fonts >>> (outside packaging) and have them running in roxterm, and I don't see >>> the artefacts that are indeed clearly visible in the screenshots. With roxterm I'm getting the same output I get with sakura (as expected). > Attached are ghostscript renderings of the two main fonts > I cannot see any difference > I believe the hinters are relevant for screen rendering only. > I still recommend to package both Truetype and Opentype So my understanding so far goes like this: 1. otf anf ttf describe the same typefaces; 2. what changes is the result after the hinting process for screen rendering. For some reason (different information in the files? different treatment by the hinting library?) the result vary. 3. If I disable hinting, the rendering is indeed identical. (With one difference: with the otf version the lines are a bit more spaced.) 4. As hinting settings, display resolution, personal preference may vary, the best option is to package all the available versions. Where should the web fonts be installed? Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From dr at jones.dk Fri Sep 4 12:48:24 2015 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 14:48:24 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E98788.5050305@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441287574.16433.23.camel@debian.org> <1441288076.16433.25.camel@debian.org> <55E854FA.1050800@ninthfloor.org> <20150903203141.2889.30410@auryn.jones.dk> <55E8B389.3020205@ninthfloor.org> <20150903224938.GR20127@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <55E956CE.4060404@ninthfloor.org> <20150904113300.2889.46487@auryn.jones.dk> <55E98788.5050305@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <20150904124824.2889.63456@auryn.jones.dk> Quoting Paride Legovini (2015-09-04 13:59:04) > On 2015-09-04 13:33, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting Paride Legovini (2015-09-04 10:31:10) >>> On 2015-09-04 00:49, Norbert Preining wrote: >>>>> Check the two attached files, it's apparent that otf version gives >>>>> a result that is by far worse. Check especially the bold 'm' >>>>> letter, the dollar symbol and the dot inside of the '0' character. >>>> >>>> Hi everyone. Just one code point: I have installed the OTF fonts >>>> (outside packaging) and have them running in roxterm, and I don't >>>> see the artefacts that are indeed clearly visible in the >>>> screenshots. > > With roxterm I'm getting the same output I get with sakura (as expected). Oh - I just tried install roxterm and other alternatives but couldn't figure out how to tell it which font to use... Sakura and Roxterm link against libvte-2.90 and libvte-2.91, both of which are linked against GTK3. Could be interesting to test e.g. mate-terminal which is linked against libvte9 and GTK2. And rxvt-unicode which supports Freetype fonts but not VTE nor GTK. >> Attached are ghostscript renderings of the two main fonts > >> I cannot see any difference > >> I believe the hinters are relevant for screen rendering only. > >> I still recommend to package both Truetype and Opentype > > So my understanding so far goes like this: > > 1. otf anf ttf describe the same typefaces; > 2. what changes is the result after the hinting process for screen > rendering. For some reason (different information in the files? > different treatment by the hinting library?) the result vary. > 3. If I disable hinting, the rendering is indeed identical. (With one > difference: with the otf version the lines are a bit more spaced.) > 4. As hinting settings, display resolution, personal preference may > vary, the best option is to package all the available versions. I agree with that. What do others feel about this? > Where should the web fonts be installed? WOFF below /usr/share/fonts/woff/hack EOT below /usr/share/eot/hack SVG /usr/share/fonts/svg/hack I would suggest to skip ttf-web for now. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: signature URL: From pl at ninthfloor.org Fri Sep 4 13:53:06 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:53:06 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <1441350321.23703.7.camel@debian.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E89909.4000903@ninthfloor.org> <1441350321.23703.7.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <55E9A242.3080800@ninthfloor.org> New version available on mentors. This time the package is split it: fonts-hack-otf - Typeface designed for source code, OpenType fonts fonts-hack-ttf - Typeface designed for source code, TrueType fonts fonts-hack-web - Typeface designed for source code, Web fonts Take a look at the rules file, now I fix some permissions there, but I'm not sure if I'm doing it in the best way. Question: should I also include the woff2 fonts? If so, should they go in /usr/share/fonts/woff/ or /woff2/? Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From dr at jones.dk Fri Sep 4 14:53:30 2015 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:53:30 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E9A242.3080800@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E89909.4000903@ninthfloor.org> <1441350321.23703.7.camel@debian.org> <55E9A242.3080800@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <20150904145330.2889.90130@auryn.jones.dk> Quoting Paride Legovini (2015-09-04 15:53:06) > Question: should I also include the woff2 fonts? If so, should they go > in /usr/share/fonts/woff/ or /woff2/? I suggest to skip WOFF2 for now too (in addition to ttf-web): You might want to mention in README.Debian that those files are skipped due to no perceived need for them, enouraging to file a bugreport it someone needs them. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: signature URL: From pl at ninthfloor.org Fri Sep 4 21:40:19 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 23:40:19 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#797627: ITP: fonts-hack -- Typeface designed for source code In-Reply-To: References: <20150831230524.31396.99201.reportbug@mandragola> <55E83E15.6000406@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <55EA0FC3.1020304@ninthfloor.org> On 2015-09-04 08:51, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Paride Legovini wrote: > >> but is it a necessary step to have the font included in main? > > Personally I wouldn't upload it to main without fixing that > >> I see that other fonts (e.g. inconsolata) just distribute the otf/ttf files. > > For some fonts there is no reproducible build process, for other fonts > folks might have been a bit lax. Not sure about Inconsolata. Dear Paul, the issue is being discussed here: https://github.com/chrissimpkins/Hack/issues/85 Long story short: there might be licensing problems. What do you think? What are more precisely the Debian requirements for the build process of its packages? Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From henrich at debian.or.jp Sun Sep 6 08:18:23 2015 From: henrich at debian.or.jp (Hideki Yamane) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 17:18:23 +0900 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#772150: Bug#772150: (no subject) In-Reply-To: <1440658921.2703.3.camel@debian.org> References: <55DD92A6.80703@free.fr> <1440658921.2703.3.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <20150906171823.3bba7be36cd3045474471bdf@debian.or.jp> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:02:01 +0200 Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Agreed, who is feeling responsible for fontforge at the moment? Just finishing debian/copyright is a issue (still). Can someone work for it? -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane From noreply at release.debian.org Sun Sep 6 16:39:19 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 16:39:19 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-horai-umefont 540-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the fonts-horai-umefont source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 530-1 Current version: 540-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From gioele at svario.it Sun Sep 6 18:34:01 2015 From: gioele at svario.it (Gioele Barabucci) Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 20:34:01 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package for Leckerli One font Message-ID: <55EC8719.30108@svario.it> Hello, I have packaged the indie Leckerli One OTF font (OFL-1.1). The ITP is available at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798202 and the git repository (for git-buildpackage) can be found at ssh://alioth.debian.org/srv/home/users/gioele-guest/public_git/fonts-leckerli-one.git I have successfully build the package and installed it. Is there something that should be changed in the way the font is packaged? What is the procedure to get this package in the shared pkg-fonts git repository? Regards, -- Gioele Barabucci From packager at pecita.net Mon Sep 7 00:09:38 2015 From: packager at pecita.net (pecita.net Archive Automatic Signing Key) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 02:09:38 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798226: fonts-pecita: New upstream release available Message-ID: Package: fonts-pecita Version: 4.3-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Package: fonts-pecita Version: 5.2 Severity: wishlist Dear Debian Fonts Task Force, I just released version 5.2. Please feel free to package it for Debian. The files are here : http://pecita.eu/b *Version* Version 5.2 - Mon 2015-09-07 - of the font Pecita *Make* The script compile.pe invokes FontForge to build Pecita.otf from PecitaSource.sfd. The build process is based on the ExpandStroke function that is, for now, unusable with fontforge > 20120731. *Title* OpenType hand-written font whose letters are connected *Description* Pecita is a hand-written font that give a natural rendition. It includes all of the full Language support for Afrikaans, Archaic Greek Letters, Baltic, Basic Cyrillic, Basic Greek, Basic Latin, Catalan, Central European, Chess Symbols, Dutch, Euro, Hebbar Tamil, Igbo Onwu, IPA, Latin Ligatures, Mathematical Operators, Pan African Latin, Pinyin, Polytonic Greek, Romanian, Turkish, Vietnamese, Western European. It implements the OpenType features "Localized form substitution, Superscript , Subscript, Small capitals, Standard ligatures, Glyph decomposition and Contextual alternates". *New possibilities in Version 5* The previous version 4 generalized the connection mechanism of letters. This version 5 generalizes the accent mechanism of letters in keeping the connection mechanism. This allows the font to be used across the spectrum of LCG scripts and in transliterations of tonal languages that make extensive use of diacritical and IPA characters. *web site* http://pecita.eu Regards, Philippe Cochy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fabian at debian.org Mon Sep 7 05:02:06 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 07:02:06 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#797627: ITP: fonts-hack -- Typeface designed for source code In-Reply-To: <55EA0FC3.1020304@ninthfloor.org> References: <20150831230524.31396.99201.reportbug@mandragola> <55E83E15.6000406@ninthfloor.org> <55EA0FC3.1020304@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <1441602126.6450.14.camel@debian.org> Am Freitag, den 04.09.2015, 23:40 +0200 schrieb Paride Legovini: > What do you think? What are more precisely the Debian requirements > for the build process of its packages? I think we should approach this with pragmatism. In the end, fonts are - like graphics - a piece of artwork distributed in a binary format which is just as editable as any other arbitrarily chosen file format. There is no canonical "source format" for fonts that could be considered their "prefered form for making modifications". This differentiates fonts (and graphics) from e.g. binary blobs which are just obfuscated source code. So, as long as the license premits this, I think that redistributing font files as they come should be considered alright. For example, I do exact this in the fonts-croscore and fonts-crosextra-* packages. Just my opinion, Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fabian at debian.org Mon Sep 7 05:07:03 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 07:07:03 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package for Leckerli One font In-Reply-To: <55EC8719.30108@svario.it> References: <55EC8719.30108@svario.it> Message-ID: <1441602423.6450.17.camel@debian.org> Hi Gioele, Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2015, 20:34 +0200 schrieb Gioele Barabucci: > I have successfully build the package and installed it. Is there > something that should be changed in the way the font is packaged? please add separate copyright and license information for "Files: debian/*" to debian/copyright. Apart from this, the package looks good to me. > What is the procedure to get this package in the shared pkg-fonts git > repository? You will need tp apply as member of the pkg-fonts team on alioth first. - Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From pabs at debian.org Mon Sep 7 06:15:32 2015 From: pabs at debian.org (Paul Wise) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 08:15:32 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#797627: ITP: fonts-hack -- Typeface designed for source code In-Reply-To: <1441602126.6450.14.camel@debian.org> References: <20150831230524.31396.99201.reportbug@mandragola> <55E83E15.6000406@ninthfloor.org> <55EA0FC3.1020304@ninthfloor.org> <1441602126.6450.14.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am Freitag, den 04.09.2015, 23:40 +0200 schrieb Paride Legovini: >> What do you think? What are more precisely the Debian requirements >> for the build process of its packages? > > I think we should approach this with pragmatism. I think we should talk to upstreams and find out how they produce their fonts, then work with them to ensure they are using best practices; distributing their source materials in a VCS repository and offering automatic methods for creating binary font files from their source materials. > In the end, fonts are - like graphics - a piece of artwork distributed > in a binary format which is just as editable as any other arbitrarily > chosen file format. There is no canonical "source format" for fonts > that could be considered their "prefered form for making > modifications". This differentiates fonts (and graphics) from e.g. > binary blobs which are just obfuscated source code. In the end, some graphics formats are more expressive and easier to edit than other formats, just like with ELF files and C code. For example it is almost impossible to adjust the blend mode of one layer in a multi-layer bitmap after rendering it to a final PNG file. It is almost impossible to adjust a curve in a vector image after rendering it to a bitmap image. For fonts the same is less true due to the tools making it easy to reverse engineer and edit binary fonts. There are tools to reverse engineer and edit ELF binaries too, but the DFSG isn't about practical editability but about equality of access to forms of a work. People downloading source packages from Debian should have equal access to font source materials as upstream. The source materials could be everything from design ideas through sketches, automatic hint generation, automatic weight generation, auto-subset scripts, UFO files or whatever the designers used to arrive at a final product. Of course that is an ideal world and today most font designers don't nessecarily publish or even keep their actual source materials AFAIK. We should talk to font designers and ask them how they produce fonts because it all depends on how upstream approaches the production of their font. > So, as long as the license premits this, I think that redistributing > font files as they come should be considered alright. For example, I do > exact this in the fonts-croscore and fonts-crosextra-* packages. I agree for some cases (fonts-mph-damase for eg) but I think the answer is case dependent and we need to talk to upstream up-front to find out. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise From pabs at debian.org Mon Sep 7 06:42:05 2015 From: pabs at debian.org (Paul Wise) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 08:42:05 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798226: Bug#798226: fonts-pecita: New upstream release available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Philippe Cochy wrote: > *Make* > The script compile.pe invokes FontForge to build Pecita.otf from > PecitaSource.sfd. > The build process is based on the ExpandStroke function that is, for now, > unusable with fontforge > 20120731. This is going to be a problem when we update fontforge to a more recent release. Would it be possible for you to fix this in the next release? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise From acquadoria at gmail.com Mon Sep 7 06:57:06 2015 From: acquadoria at gmail.com (Maison de Pecita) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 08:57:06 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798226: Bug#798226: fonts-pecita: New upstream release available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2015-09-07 8:42 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise : > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Philippe Cochy wrote: > >> *Make* >> The script compile.pe invokes FontForge to build Pecita.otf from >> PecitaSource.sfd. >> The build process is based on the ExpandStroke function that is, for now, >> unusable with fontforge > 20120731. > > This is going to be a problem when we update fontforge to a more > recent release. Would it be possible for you to fix this in the next > release? No, this is not possible because the font is fully based on the ExpandStroke function. There is an open bug: https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/1747 From gioele at svario.it Mon Sep 7 07:20:39 2015 From: gioele at svario.it (Gioele Barabucci) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 09:20:39 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package for Leckerli One font In-Reply-To: <1441602423.6450.17.camel@debian.org> References: <55EC8719.30108@svario.it> <1441602423.6450.17.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <55ED3AC7.4040507@svario.it> On 07/09/2015 07:07, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Hi Gioele, > > Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2015, 20:34 +0200 schrieb Gioele Barabucci: >> I have successfully build the package and installed it. Is there >> something that should be changed in the way the font is packaged? > > please add separate copyright and license information for "Files: > debian/*" to debian/copyright. Apart from this, the package looks good > to me. Hi Fabian, `debian/copyright` already contains Files: debian/* Copyright: 2015 Gioele Barabucci License: CC0-1.0 isn't that enough? Regards, -- Gioele Barabucci From fabian at debian.org Mon Sep 7 07:30:39 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 09:30:39 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package for Leckerli One font In-Reply-To: <55ED3AC7.4040507@svario.it> References: <55EC8719.30108@svario.it> <1441602423.6450.17.camel@debian.org> <55ED3AC7.4040507@svario.it> Message-ID: <1441611039.13423.4.camel@debian.org> Am Montag, den 07.09.2015, 09:20 +0200 schrieb Gioele Barabucci: > isn't that enough? Sure it is. Sorry, I must have overlooked this when scrolling through the copyright file. I somehow expected a simpler/shorter license for the packaging, like e.g. the gnu all-permissive license. - Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fabian at debian.org Mon Sep 7 07:44:32 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 09:44:32 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#772150: fontforge update In-Reply-To: <20150906171823.3bba7be36cd3045474471bdf@debian.or.jp> References: <55DD92A6.80703@free.fr> <1440658921.2703.3.camel@debian.org> <20150906171823.3bba7be36cd3045474471bdf@debian.or.jp> Message-ID: <1441611872.22664.1.camel@debian.org> Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2015, 17:18 +0900 schrieb Hideki Yamane: > Just finishing debian/copyright is a issue (still). > Can someone work for it? There already seems to be a decent font->license mapping prepared in upstream's LICENSE file. Copyright holders and files with GPL/LGPL licenses appear to be still incomplete, though. - Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From vasudev at copyninja.info Mon Sep 7 17:00:34 2015 From: vasudev at copyninja.info (Vasudev Kamath) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 22:30:34 +0530 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798261: ITP: fonts-roboto-fontface -- largely geometric, friendly and open curves font In-Reply-To: <20150907133427.20866.55412.reportbug@buzig2.mirantis.com> (Thomas Goirand's message of "Mon, 07 Sep 2015 15:34:27 +0200") References: <20150907133427.20866.55412.reportbug@buzig2.mirantis.com> Message-ID: <878u8iyxjh.fsf@rudra.copyninja.info> Hi Thomas, We already have a fonts-roboto which is part of fonts-android source. ?. There was a discussion on pkg-fonts-devel IIRC previously to split roboto fonts to its own package as code was moved to its own git repository. Sorry but I don't exactly have the link to discussion, so ccing fonts team. I wonder if we can eliminate duplicate and have a single font. ? https://packages.debian.org/unstable/fonts-roboto Cheers, -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 818 bytes Desc: not available URL: From zigo at debian.org Mon Sep 7 17:53:16 2015 From: zigo at debian.org (Thomas Goirand) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 19:53:16 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798261: ITP: fonts-roboto-fontface -- largely geometric, friendly and open curves font In-Reply-To: <878u8iyxjh.fsf@rudra.copyninja.info> References: <20150907133427.20866.55412.reportbug@buzig2.mirantis.com> <878u8iyxjh.fsf@rudra.copyninja.info> Message-ID: <55EDCF0C.2020508@debian.org> On 09/07/2015 07:00 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > We already have a fonts-roboto which is part of fonts-android > source. ?. There was a discussion on pkg-fonts-devel IIRC previously to > split roboto fonts to its own package as code was moved to its own git > repository. Sorry but I don't exactly have the link to discussion, so > ccing fonts team. > > I wonder if we can eliminate duplicate and have a single font. > > ? https://packages.debian.org/unstable/fonts-roboto > > Cheers, Hi, That's not the same package. The one that I'm packaging has not only the .ttf files, but also .eot, .svg, .woff and .woff2, plus .css, .less and .scss files. All of these are needed for the web developers. See this Git repository: https://github.com/choffmeister/roboto-fontface-bower If you wish to drop the generation of fonts-roboto from the fonts-android package, then good. I could add a transition package for it, or rename the binary as fonts-roboto, if you think that's a more appropriate way. Whatever happen, we would need the fonts-roboto-fontface package to be in the archive first, so it can take over the old package. I also need to package fonts-materialdesignicons from here: https://github.com/Templarian/MaterialDesign-Webfont Do you think I should join the pkg-fonts group to maintain these fonts under the group? Note that all of these are for the OpenStack dashboard (aka Horizon), which needs all of these as embedded fonts in its web pages. Your input is more than welcome, Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) From dr at jones.dk Mon Sep 7 18:42:48 2015 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 20:42:48 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798261: ITP: fonts-roboto-fontface -- largely geometric, friendly and open curves font In-Reply-To: <55EDCF0C.2020508@debian.org> References: <20150907133427.20866.55412.reportbug@buzig2.mirantis.com> <878u8iyxjh.fsf@rudra.copyninja.info> <55EDCF0C.2020508@debian.org> Message-ID: <20150907184248.3429.70140@auryn.jones.dk> Hi Thomas, Quoting Thomas Goirand (2015-09-07 19:53:16) > On 09/07/2015 07:00 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> We already have a fonts-roboto which is part of fonts-android >> source. ?. There was a discussion on pkg-fonts-devel IIRC previously to >> split roboto fonts to its own package as code was moved to its own git >> repository. Sorry but I don't exactly have the link to discussion, so >> ccing fonts team. >> >> I wonder if we can eliminate duplicate and have a single font. >> >> ? https://packages.debian.org/unstable/fonts-roboto > That's not the same package. The one that I'm packaging has not only > the .ttf files, but also .eot, .svg, .woff and .woff2, plus .css, > .less and .scss files. All of these are needed for the web developers. Seems the project you want to package only includes the Roboto font, but is not the canonical source of the font: Package description begins with "A simple package providing the Roboto fontface." > If you wish to drop the generation of fonts-roboto from the > fonts-android package, then good. I think the better approach is to keep the fonts-roboto package, have your package exclude fonts, depend on the fonts-roboto package, and symlink font files from there as needed. > Do you think I should join the pkg-fonts group to maintain these fonts > under the group? We can always use more helping hands in the fonts team :-) But if your focus is on OpenStack then perhaps just coordinate with the font team on tuning the fonts-roboto package to provide what is needed for reuse with OpenStack - i.e. those web representations of the font (CSS/Sass/Less sounds like OpenStack-specific glue so probably makes best sense to package separately). Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: signature URL: From gioele at svario.it Mon Sep 7 21:29:37 2015 From: gioele at svario.it (Gioele Barabucci) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 23:29:37 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package for Leckerli One font In-Reply-To: <1441602423.6450.17.camel@debian.org> References: <55EC8719.30108@svario.it> <1441602423.6450.17.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <55EE01C1.10505@svario.it> On 07/09/2015 07:07, Fabian Greffrath wrote: >> What is the procedure to get this package in the shared pkg-fonts git >> repository? > > You will need tp apply as member of the pkg-fonts team on alioth first. Hi, the package repository is now available at /git/pkg-fonts/fonts-leckerli-one.git (repo created with `setup-repository`). Now what? Is there an autobuilder that will build the package? Or will somebody from the pkg-fonts team build it manually and upload it? Regards, -- Gioele Barabucci From vasudev at copyninja.info Tue Sep 8 03:33:10 2015 From: vasudev at copyninja.info (Vasudev Kamath) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 09:03:10 +0530 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798261: ITP: fonts-roboto-fontface -- largely geometric, friendly and open curves font In-Reply-To: <55EDCF0C.2020508@debian.org> (Thomas Goirand's message of "Mon, 07 Sep 2015 19:53:16 +0200") References: <20150907133427.20866.55412.reportbug@buzig2.mirantis.com> <878u8iyxjh.fsf@rudra.copyninja.info> <55EDCF0C.2020508@debian.org> Message-ID: <87613legax.fsf@copyninja.info> Thomas Goirand writes: > > Hi, > > That's not the same package. The one that I'm packaging has not only the > .ttf files, but also .eot, .svg, .woff and .woff2, plus .css, .less and > .scss files. All of these are needed for the web developers. See this > Git repository: > > https://github.com/choffmeister/roboto-fontface-bower Yes I saw that, but I think its not the actual upstream of Roboto fonts. See ? That is why I replied to your ITP :-). ? http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/2015-May/015896.html > > If you wish to drop the generation of fonts-roboto from the > fonts-android package, then good. I could add a transition package for > it, or rename the binary as fonts-roboto, if you think that's a more > appropriate way. Whatever happen, we would need the > fonts-roboto-fontface package to be in the archive first, so it can take > over the old package. I would like to know the teams opinion here, as the upstream for Roboto fonts is different from the roboto-fontface-bower. @pabs any comments/suggestion. > > I also need to package fonts-materialdesignicons from here: > > https://github.com/Templarian/MaterialDesign-Webfont > > Do you think I should join the pkg-fonts group to maintain these fonts > under the group? That would be great. Most of fonts in Debian are maintained under the fonts team. (most not all there are exceptions). > > Note that all of these are for the OpenStack dashboard (aka Horizon), > which needs all of these as embedded fonts in its web pages. Yeah, we already have couple of webfonts under pkg-fonts team, though there is no strict policy yet we place them under /usr/share/fonts/type where type can be ttf, otf, woff, svg eot, etc. And less/css/scss files under /usr/share/fonts-package. As an example you can have a look at fonts-font-awesome source, which is also used by owncloud. From zigo at debian.org Tue Sep 8 07:28:15 2015 From: zigo at debian.org (Thomas Goirand) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 09:28:15 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798261: ITP: fonts-roboto-fontface -- largely geometric, friendly and open curves font In-Reply-To: <20150907184248.3429.70140@auryn.jones.dk> References: <20150907133427.20866.55412.reportbug@buzig2.mirantis.com> <878u8iyxjh.fsf@rudra.copyninja.info> <55EDCF0C.2020508@debian.org> <20150907184248.3429.70140@auryn.jones.dk> Message-ID: <55EE8E0F.80901@debian.org> On 09/07/2015 08:42 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> If you wish to drop the generation of fonts-roboto from the >> fonts-android package, then good. > > I think the better approach is to keep the fonts-roboto package, have > your package exclude fonts, depend on the fonts-roboto package, and > symlink font files from there as needed. I don't think so. The fonts-roboto package currently only provides .tff files, which are useless for the web. The sources aren't the same. Also, I don't think the FTP masters would like to have even more binary packages and dependencies. If these can be avoided, it's best for the Debian infrastructure, I heard. >> Do you think I should join the pkg-fonts group to maintain these fonts >> under the group? > > We can always use more helping hands in the fonts team :-) > > But if your focus is on OpenStack then perhaps just coordinate with the > font team on tuning the fonts-roboto package to provide what is needed > for reuse with OpenStack - i.e. those web representations of the font > (CSS/Sass/Less sounds like OpenStack-specific glue so probably makes > best sense to package separately). They aren't OpenStack specific, it's just modern Javascript stuff, which can be reused by any project. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) From dr at jones.dk Tue Sep 8 08:11:18 2015 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:11:18 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798261: ITP: fonts-roboto-fontface -- largely geometric, friendly and open curves font In-Reply-To: <55EE8E0F.80901@debian.org> References: <20150907133427.20866.55412.reportbug@buzig2.mirantis.com> <878u8iyxjh.fsf@rudra.copyninja.info> <55EDCF0C.2020508@debian.org> <20150907184248.3429.70140@auryn.jones.dk> <55EE8E0F.80901@debian.org> Message-ID: <20150908081118.3429.9875@auryn.jones.dk> Quoting Thomas Goirand (2015-09-08 09:28:15) > On 09/07/2015 08:42 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> If you wish to drop the generation of fonts-roboto from the >>> fonts-android package, then good. >> >> I think the better approach is to keep the fonts-roboto package, have >> your package exclude fonts, depend on the fonts-roboto package, and >> symlink font files from there as needed. > > I don't think so. The fonts-roboto package currently only provides > .tff files, which are useless for the web. The sources aren't the > same. What are the sources, then? > Also, I don't think the FTP masters would like to have even more > binary packages and dependencies. If these can be avoided, it's best > for the Debian infrastructure, I heard. It is not best for Debian to track actual upstreams as our upstream rather than redistributors. >>> Do you think I should join the pkg-fonts group to maintain these >>> fonts under the group? >> >> We can always use more helping hands in the fonts team :-) >> >> But if your focus is on OpenStack then perhaps just coordinate with >> the font team on tuning the fonts-roboto package to provide what is >> needed for reuse with OpenStack - i.e. those web representations of >> the font (CSS/Sass/Less sounds like OpenStack-specific glue so >> probably makes best sense to package separately). > > They aren't OpenStack specific, it's just modern Javascript stuff, > which can be reused by any project. Great - then suggest maintainers of the existing package to adopt those tiny files too. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: signature URL: From projecta at promooffer.eu Tue Sep 8 09:15:23 2015 From: projecta at promooffer.eu (=?UTF-8?B?0J/RgNC+0LTQttC10LrRgtCw?=) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 12:15:23 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0J/QvtC60LDQvdCwINC30LAg0KPQv9GA0LA=?= =?utf-8?b?0LLQu9C10L3QuNC1INC90LAg0L/RgNC+0LXQutGC0LgsINCR0LjQt9C9?= =?utf-8?b?0LXRgSDRgdC10YDRgtC40YTQuNC60LDRhtC40Lgg0Lgg0J/RgNC+0LM=?= =?utf-8?b?0YDQsNC80Lgg0L3QsCDQldCh?= Message-ID: <329431b98b11e597dbffeed34c5284ab@statsystem.eu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fabian at debian.org Tue Sep 8 11:46:00 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 13:46:00 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package for Leckerli One font In-Reply-To: <55EE01C1.10505@svario.it> References: <55EC8719.30108@svario.it> <1441602423.6450.17.camel@debian.org> <55EE01C1.10505@svario.it> Message-ID: <1441712760.2431.0.camel@debian.org> Am Montag, den 07.09.2015, 23:29 +0200 schrieb Gioele Barabucci: > Now what? Is there an autobuilder that will build the package? Or will > somebody from the pkg-fonts team build it manually and upload it? The latter. But please run 'dch -r' to finish debian/changelog before. - Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From gioele at svario.it Tue Sep 8 21:11:39 2015 From: gioele at svario.it (Gioele Barabucci) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 23:11:39 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package for Leckerli One font In-Reply-To: <1441712760.2431.0.camel@debian.org> References: <55EC8719.30108@svario.it> <1441602423.6450.17.camel@debian.org> <55EE01C1.10505@svario.it> <1441712760.2431.0.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <55EF4F0B.7000604@svario.it> On 08/09/2015 13:46, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am Montag, den 07.09.2015, 23:29 +0200 schrieb Gioele Barabucci: >> Now what? Is there an autobuilder that will build the package? Or will >> somebody from the pkg-fonts team build it manually and upload it? > > The latter. But please run 'dch -r' to finish debian/changelog before. Thank you. I have run `dch -r` and updated the git repository. I plan on packaging other fonts. Should I follow the same steps for them? Open a ITP, package them, put the repo in the shared git space, ping for reviews and to get the package uploaded? Or is there a preferred workflow? Regards, -- Gioele Barabucci From zigo at debian.org Tue Sep 8 21:58:31 2015 From: zigo at debian.org (Thomas Goirand) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 23:58:31 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798261: ITP: fonts-roboto-fontface -- largely geometric, friendly and open curves font In-Reply-To: <87613legax.fsf@copyninja.info> References: <20150907133427.20866.55412.reportbug@buzig2.mirantis.com> <878u8iyxjh.fsf@rudra.copyninja.info> <55EDCF0C.2020508@debian.org> <87613legax.fsf@copyninja.info> Message-ID: <55EF5A07.4000400@debian.org> On 09/08/2015 05:33 AM, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > Yeah, we already have couple of webfonts under pkg-fonts team, though > there is no strict policy yet we place them under /usr/share/fonts/type > where type can be ttf, otf, woff, svg eot, etc. And less/css/scss files > under /usr/share/fonts-package. That's what I've done in my package, indeed. > As an example you can have a look at fonts-font-awesome source, which is also > used by owncloud. Horizon also uses the fonts-font-awesome package, so it's nice to have such consistency indeed. Now, to move on, what's next action? Remove the fonts-roboto generation from the android fonts source? Or ... ? The thing is, I really *need* this webfont and the CSS, otherwise Horizon will be quite broken. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) From mishmag at nasmetka.eu Wed Sep 9 01:30:35 2015 From: mishmag at nasmetka.eu (=?UTF-8?B?0JDRgNGCIMKnINCl0L7QsdC4INC80LDQs9Cw0LfQuNC9?=) Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 04:30:35 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0J3Rj9C80LDRiCDRhdC+0LHQuCEg0LXRgtC+?= =?utf-8?b?INGC0LggMTIgMDAwINC40LTQtdC4IQ==?= Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vasudev at copyninja.info Wed Sep 9 03:36:57 2015 From: vasudev at copyninja.info (Vasudev Kamath) Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 09:06:57 +0530 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798261: ITP: fonts-roboto-fontface -- largely geometric, friendly and open curves font In-Reply-To: <55EF5A07.4000400@debian.org> (Thomas Goirand's message of "Tue, 08 Sep 2015 23:58:31 +0200") References: <20150907133427.20866.55412.reportbug@buzig2.mirantis.com> <878u8iyxjh.fsf@rudra.copyninja.info> <55EDCF0C.2020508@debian.org> <87613legax.fsf@copyninja.info> <55EF5A07.4000400@debian.org> Message-ID: <87y4ggclgm.fsf@copyninja.info> Thomas Goirand writes: > On 09/08/2015 05:33 AM, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> Yeah, we already have couple of webfonts under pkg-fonts team, though >> there is no strict policy yet we place them under /usr/share/fonts/type >> where type can be ttf, otf, woff, svg eot, etc. And less/css/scss files >> under /usr/share/fonts-package. > > That's what I've done in my package, indeed. OK. > >> As an example you can have a look at fonts-font-awesome source, which is also >> used by owncloud. > > Horizon also uses the fonts-font-awesome package, so it's nice to have > such consistency indeed. > > Now, to move on, what's next action? Remove the fonts-roboto generation > from the android fonts source? Or ... ? The thing is, I really *need* > this webfont and the CSS, otherwise Horizon will be quite broken. I'm not quite sure, as said earlier roboto-fontface-bower is not the original roboto upstream so splitting it from the fonts-android doesn't sound right. OTOH to build fonts-roboto from actual upstream it needs a lot of work as most of tools needed are not/not up-to-date in Debian. May be for now it should be fine to ship fonts-roboto-fontface as not to block the bringing of Horizon into Debian. May be once we have proper fonts-roboto in proper shape in Debian we can generate required woff/svg files and make roboto-fontface-bower only ship required less/css/scss files. From fabian at debian.org Wed Sep 9 07:05:09 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 09:05:09 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Package for Leckerli One font In-Reply-To: <55EF4F0B.7000604@svario.it> References: <55EC8719.30108@svario.it> <1441602423.6450.17.camel@debian.org> <55EE01C1.10505@svario.it> <1441712760.2431.0.camel@debian.org> <55EF4F0B.7000604@svario.it> Message-ID: <1441782309.20987.1.camel@debian.org> Am Dienstag, den 08.09.2015, 23:11 +0200 schrieb Gioele Barabucci: > Thank you. I have run `dch -r` and updated the git repository. Uploaded, thanks! > I plan on packaging other fonts. Should I follow the same steps for > them? Open a ITP, package them, put the repo in the shared git space, > ping for reviews and to get the package uploaded? Or is there a > preferred workflow? This is *exactly* the preferred workflow. ;) Cheers, Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Wed Sep 9 07:08:04 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 07:08:04 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-leckerli-one_20110000-1_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-leckerli-one_20110000-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-leckerli-one_20110000-1.dsc fonts-leckerli-one_20110000.orig.tar.gz fonts-leckerli-one_20110000-1.debian.tar.xz fonts-leckerli-one_20110000-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Wed Sep 9 07:18:57 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 07:18:57 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-leckerli-one_20110000-1_amd64.changes is NEW Message-ID: binary:fonts-leckerli-one is NEW. source:fonts-leckerli-one is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will recieve an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html From zigo at debian.org Wed Sep 9 07:20:51 2015 From: zigo at debian.org (Thomas Goirand) Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 09:20:51 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798261: ITP: fonts-roboto-fontface -- largely geometric, friendly and open curves font In-Reply-To: <20150908081118.3429.9875@auryn.jones.dk> References: <20150907133427.20866.55412.reportbug@buzig2.mirantis.com> <878u8iyxjh.fsf@rudra.copyninja.info> <55EDCF0C.2020508@debian.org> <20150907184248.3429.70140@auryn.jones.dk> <55EE8E0F.80901@debian.org> <20150908081118.3429.9875@auryn.jones.dk> Message-ID: <55EFDDD3.6030101@debian.org> On 09/08/2015 10:11 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Thomas Goirand (2015-09-08 09:28:15) >> On 09/07/2015 08:42 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>>> If you wish to drop the generation of fonts-roboto from the >>>> fonts-android package, then good. >>> >>> I think the better approach is to keep the fonts-roboto package, have >>> your package exclude fonts, depend on the fonts-roboto package, and >>> symlink font files from there as needed. >> >> I don't think so. The fonts-roboto package currently only provides >> .tff files, which are useless for the web. The sources aren't the >> same. > > What are the sources, then? git://github.com/choffmeister/roboto-fontface-bower.git >>>> Do you think I should join the pkg-fonts group to maintain these >>>> fonts under the group? >>> >>> We can always use more helping hands in the fonts team :-) >>> >>> But if your focus is on OpenStack then perhaps just coordinate with >>> the font team on tuning the fonts-roboto package to provide what is >>> needed for reuse with OpenStack - i.e. those web representations of >>> the font (CSS/Sass/Less sounds like OpenStack-specific glue so >>> probably makes best sense to package separately). >> >> They aren't OpenStack specific, it's just modern Javascript stuff, >> which can be reused by any project. > > Great - then suggest maintainers of the existing package to adopt those > tiny files too. Well, we just talked about dropping the generation of fonts-roboto from the old source package... Or am I missing something? Cheers, Thomas From dr at jones.dk Wed Sep 9 08:09:41 2015 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:09:41 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798261: ITP: fonts-roboto-fontface -- largely geometric, friendly and open curves font In-Reply-To: <55EFDDD3.6030101@debian.org> References: <20150907133427.20866.55412.reportbug@buzig2.mirantis.com> <878u8iyxjh.fsf@rudra.copyninja.info> <55EDCF0C.2020508@debian.org> <20150907184248.3429.70140@auryn.jones.dk> <55EE8E0F.80901@debian.org> <20150908081118.3429.9875@auryn.jones.dk> <55EFDDD3.6030101@debian.org> Message-ID: <20150909080941.3103.99369@auryn.jones.dk> Quoting Thomas Goirand (2015-09-09 09:20:51) > On 09/08/2015 10:11 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting Thomas Goirand (2015-09-08 09:28:15) >>> On 09/07/2015 08:42 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>>>> If you wish to drop the generation of fonts-roboto from the >>>>> fonts-android package, then good. >>>> >>>> I think the better approach is to keep the fonts-roboto package, have >>>> your package exclude fonts, depend on the fonts-roboto package, and >>>> symlink font files from there as needed. >>> >>> I don't think so. The fonts-roboto package currently only provides >>> .tff files, which are useless for the web. The sources aren't the >>> same. >> >> What are the sources, then? > > git://github.com/choffmeister/roboto-fontface-bower.git I do understand that above is the URL you intend to fetch the project from. What I meant by my question is what is the source of the material you are fetching? What is the source of WOFF and SVG files? Or do you mean to tell me that WOFF and SVG files are _forks_ of the TTF files, developed independently onwards? I find that highly unlikely. >>>>> Do you think I should join the pkg-fonts group to maintain these >>>>> fonts under the group? >>>> >>>> We can always use more helping hands in the fonts team :-) >>>> >>>> But if your focus is on OpenStack then perhaps just coordinate with >>>> the font team on tuning the fonts-roboto package to provide what is >>>> needed for reuse with OpenStack - i.e. those web representations of >>>> the font (CSS/Sass/Less sounds like OpenStack-specific glue so >>>> probably makes best sense to package separately). >>> >>> They aren't OpenStack specific, it's just modern Javascript stuff, >>> which can be reused by any project. >> >> Great - then suggest maintainers of the existing package to adopt >> those tiny files too. > > Well, we just talked about dropping the generation of fonts-roboto > from the old source package... Or am I missing something? Yes, that is a suggestion you brought up, but which it seems neither Vasudev nor me agree with. Looking at recent posts from Paul Wise on the fonts team list, it seems he also do not agree with packaging fonts known to have their actual source - even if our tools to rebuild from that canonical source is currently lacking in Debian. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: signature URL: From neustoima at mailsad.net Thu Sep 10 00:43:36 2015 From: neustoima at mailsad.net (=?UTF-8?B?TmV1c3RvaW1hLmJnIC0g0KHQtdC60YHQuCDQsdC10LvRjNC+INC4INC00YDQtdGF0Lg=?=) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 03:43:36 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0JXRgdC10L3RgtCwINC00L7QudC00LUg0LAg?= =?utf-8?b?0YEg0L3QtdGPINC4INC90L7QstC40YLQtSDQvdC4INC10YHQtdC90L0=?= =?utf-8?b?0Lgg0YHQtdC60YHQuCDQv9GA0LXQtNC70L7QttC10L3QuNGPIQ==?= Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pere at hungry.com Thu Sep 10 05:45:46 2015 From: pere at hungry.com (Petter Reinholdtsen) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 07:45:46 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#687172: Fontconfig file warnings for fonts-sil-andika in Jessie In-Reply-To: <20150403111547.GA11581@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> References: <20150403111547.GA11581@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> Message-ID: <20150910054546.GA22969@diskless.uio.no> [Andreas Mohr] > For message documentation reasons, the exact error output as > experienced on iceweasel startup is: Yes, and it is very annoying. I see it with both inkscape, pavucontrol and okular, and can not really remove the problematic fonts-sil-andika package because it is needed by tuxmath and tuxtype. Any chance to have this issue fixed in Jessie? -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen From abe at debian.org Thu Sep 10 07:49:48 2015 From: abe at debian.org (Axel Beckert) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:49:48 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#687172: Fontconfig file warnings for fonts-sil-andika in Jessie In-Reply-To: <20150910054546.GA22969@diskless.uio.no> References: <20150403111547.GA11581@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> <20150910054546.GA22969@diskless.uio.no> Message-ID: <20150910074948.GM3721@sym.noone.org> Hi, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Andreas Mohr] > > For message documentation reasons, the exact error output as > > experienced on iceweasel startup is: > > Yes, and it is very annoying. I see it with both inkscape, > pavucontrol and okular, and can not really remove the problematic > fonts-sil-andika package because it is needed by tuxmath and tuxtype. Let me add Emacs, gucharmap, lxrandr, arandr, and probably tons of other packages, too. > Any chance to have this issue fixed in Jessie? That would be nice, indeed. I've now copied the file /etc/fonts/conf.avail/65-andika.conf from an Unstable system over the one on my Jessie installation as shown below. That helped. But since stable and unstable both have 1.004-2 as well and I can't remember having changed that file manually, this probably means that I only have that issue because of https://bugs.debian.org/768232 (fonts-sil-andika: conffiles not removed). The fixed file for those who are annoyed enough to edit conffiles themselves: Andika Design Review Andika Andika Basic Andika Andika Design Review A Andika Andika Design Review B Andika Andika Design Review C Andika Andika Design Review D Andika Andika Design Review E Andika Andika Design Review F Andika Andika Design Review G Andika Andika Design Review H Andika Andika Basic Andika Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert , http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 10 17:01:35 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:01:35 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of birdfont_2.11.3-1_amd64.changes Message-ID: birdfont_2.11.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: birdfont_2.11.3-1.dsc birdfont_2.11.3.orig.tar.xz birdfont_2.11.3-1.debian.tar.xz birdfont_2.11.3-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 10 17:04:05 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:04:05 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] birdfont_2.11.3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 01:48:18 +0900 Source: birdfont Binary: birdfont Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.11.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Hideki Yamane Description: birdfont - font editor that lets you create outline vector graphics and expo Changes: birdfont (2.11.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Imported Upstream version 2.11.3 * debian/patches - drop all patches: merged upstream Checksums-Sha1: 070d98fb19ea55cc46e83bff73332b047225e3f7 2126 birdfont_2.11.3-1.dsc 9a8f98d7da5805c71e48c80db31e627b975d63c8 2261668 birdfont_2.11.3.orig.tar.xz fc6051bcf5fddab76dc75eb1213b2b7a90a1d362 4016 birdfont_2.11.3-1.debian.tar.xz 7834a3dea3820a6a2c3678c2d53e9c03a8263122 2762128 birdfont_2.11.3-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: c1eff789421c78a3353e1f8a8a8ef027baba005814cf6b33176f3227bc2205b6 2126 birdfont_2.11.3-1.dsc 9574d296232ea6f51e423ab6694df045059ce25c00454d28f99e5328e765ae2f 2261668 birdfont_2.11.3.orig.tar.xz 3e92e6ea34297c3c38c31e2e3765edea3b9fe34e2e547cbbb431d9922888236a 4016 birdfont_2.11.3-1.debian.tar.xz dc2bccce5fecf2e960a8d3e01be1099df93fadbfff51b290bd326677c7917b8a 2762128 birdfont_2.11.3-1_amd64.deb Files: 5bd39bce21b4b2938bcedcc785c88aeb 2126 fonts extra birdfont_2.11.3-1.dsc 0b4fbd0de8a0da174f4d8f2e04d07268 2261668 fonts extra birdfont_2.11.3.orig.tar.xz 49f91f58eaa65c13c7dcaa9e71972def 4016 fonts extra birdfont_2.11.3-1.debian.tar.xz b109721141246da9367aee1d8b565550 2762128 fonts extra birdfont_2.11.3-1_amd64.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV8bbmAAoJEF0yjQgqqrFAbH0P/R838ay/xbs8njTn0b6jpdEr bRsyDEJ6c6qI4QPFcR/AxDaL8bF+EJYJzyICPO73NIwzBkymUYhD8SAPN0SzGndV hgGhC78fHawln7hf+qJiLMIkbhCeZHCGi2zA98XdQ22lqL2D9mCyLkHZo+tzn71U 0R/sbm/Q/88LaJJaIrBQ7MoZkMwzBmu1hkRd5rSXDPosDMNGAEx64/jBQIz9h62M /LBfFtKVE+U+sBQFK7VlW6F0G0ag/6OT7aO82mOFN6px847PCRgsetF9KbbNZ44x vkUEVXn/wO4HqarO0p6FMTGih5lRkHxbrxD74PnIS3rJDoWdG8AiD6bFbsBNIPZU quEKhmnO9T4qKaIxExlArDnf43lB0E9HlVh/BeT0M/xWj1M2/yGI9uSlafeY9Y1X lUk9/UtJHUQ2yxtcDzfKxogFluE2GlDspQmEkR2ZFbw1RA+bab+IaDR5sznSDPdx ABBTN2+BwlLlgKqdwNVPm/smdA/X1Qg2oyrpmnF21nKY4TAMTJzETWeLvma5N5Ue Irny/MRicq2djAOpxBTxm255ACHln7gD4c8wnW55TjF/XvusJkteIg1NP+LVBTMU 8mB3e9BT5Gsys/7AAFUDYkba/wFGFgE8Fq33D29JPaRU6vuKQcUZlFEjXc/okJSu GrnuadhNb13FsIIGqytw =u0+E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From pl at ninthfloor.org Thu Sep 10 19:55:48 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:55:48 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#797627: ITP: fonts-hack -- Typeface designed for source code In-Reply-To: References: <20150831230524.31396.99201.reportbug@mandragola> <55E83E15.6000406@ninthfloor.org> <55EA0FC3.1020304@ninthfloor.org> <1441602126.6450.14.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <55F1E044.7080006@ninthfloor.org> On 2015-09-07 08:15, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: >> Am Freitag, den 04.09.2015, 23:40 +0200 schrieb Paride Legovini: >>> What do you think? What are more precisely the Debian requirements >>> for the build process of its packages? >> >> I think we should approach this with pragmatism. > > I think we should talk to upstreams and find out how they produce > their fonts, then work with them to ensure they are using best > practices; distributing their source materials in a VCS repository and > offering automatic methods for creating binary font files from their > source materials. Dear Paul, here is the developer's point on the build process: https://github.com/chrissimpkins/Hack/issues/85#issuecomment-139083942 The builds are performed with FontLab Studio (OS X), but it should be possible to build at least the ttf fonts with FontForge in an automated way. I propose to start distributing just the official font files at first (after all, I decided to package a font to make practice on a simple package!). After this I'll be happy to help upstream with the build scripts, and improve the Debian package when it's time. My idea is that it shouldn't be more difficult to distribute a font where the source code is available (even if not provided with an automated build process) rather than a font where only the final product is made available. Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From preining at logic.at Thu Sep 10 23:10:14 2015 From: preining at logic.at (Norbert Preining) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:10:14 +0900 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#797627: ITP: fonts-hack -- Typeface designed for source code In-Reply-To: <55F1E044.7080006@ninthfloor.org> References: <20150831230524.31396.99201.reportbug@mandragola> <55E83E15.6000406@ninthfloor.org> <55EA0FC3.1020304@ninthfloor.org> <1441602126.6450.14.camel@debian.org> <55F1E044.7080006@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <20150910231014.GN27401@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Paride Legovini wrote: > My idea is that it shouldn't be more difficult to distribute a font > where the source code is available (even if not provided with an > automated build process) rather than a font where only the final product > is made available. Good luck with this interpretation ... unfortunately the Debian's standpoint, or better, the interpretation of the constitution according to the *guardians* of Debian, will quite probably disagree with you. I know the pain. Good luck! Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From fabian at debian.org Fri Sep 11 07:10:17 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:10:17 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#797627: ITP: fonts-hack -- Typeface designed for source code In-Reply-To: <55F1E044.7080006@ninthfloor.org> References: <20150831230524.31396.99201.reportbug@mandragola> <55E83E15.6000406@ninthfloor.org> <55EA0FC3.1020304@ninthfloor.org> <1441602126.6450.14.camel@debian.org> <55F1E044.7080006@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <1441955417.28184.9.camel@debian.org> Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2015, 21:55 +0200 schrieb Paride Legovini: > My idea is that it shouldn't be more difficult to distribute a font > where the source code is available (even if not provided with an > automated build process) rather than a font where only the final product > is made available. +1 1) In the case a thand, we distribute fonts with their sources. We just don't have the resources currently in Debian to rebuild the fonts from these sources. And even if there weren't sources available in .ufo format, fonts that are distributed merely in their native .ttf format have routinely been accepted into the archive. 2) Even if we were able to compile fonts from the .ufo source format into any other format, it is not clear if rebuilding them without changing the font name would infringe the license of the fonts or not. - Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From nazaembg at bgmeil.eu Fri Sep 11 09:07:12 2015 From: nazaembg at bgmeil.eu (=?UTF-8?B?0J/QsNGA0Lgg0J3QsNC30LDQtdC8INCR0JM=?=) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:07:12 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0J/RgNC+0LzQvtGG0LjRjyAi0J/RitGA0LI=?= =?utf-8?b?0Lgg0YPRh9C10LHQtdC9INC00LXQvSI=?= Message-ID: <702ed995dc6bdb2b509c05380ee3008d@statmails.eu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dr at jones.dk Sat Sep 12 12:56:59 2015 From: dr at jones.dk (Jonas Smedegaard) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 14:56:59 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <55E95AC3.4020802@ninthfloor.org> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E89909.4000903@ninthfloor.org> <1441350321.23703.7.camel@debian.org> <55E95AC3.4020802@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <20150912125659.32736.56248@auryn.jones.dk> Quoting Paride Legovini (2015-09-04 10:48:03) > I'll submit an upgraded package once the otf/ttf issue is settled. You might wanna test the rendering quality with freetype 2.6-1 that just entered Debian unstable today: It mentions having re-enabled the CFF engine. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: signature URL: From pl at ninthfloor.org Sat Sep 12 16:14:14 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 18:14:14 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Looking for a sponsor for my fonts-hack package In-Reply-To: <20150912125659.32736.56248@auryn.jones.dk> References: <55E5F571.4010208@ninthfloor.org> <1441255504.26206.18.camel@debian.org> <55E89909.4000903@ninthfloor.org> <1441350321.23703.7.camel@debian.org> <55E95AC3.4020802@ninthfloor.org> <20150912125659.32736.56248@auryn.jones.dk> Message-ID: <55F44F56.2020500@ninthfloor.org> On 2015-09-12 14:56, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Paride Legovini (2015-09-04 10:48:03) >> I'll submit an upgraded package once the otf/ttf issue is settled. > > You might wanna test the rendering quality with freetype 2.6-1 that just > entered Debian unstable today: It mentions having re-enabled the CFF > engine. Thanks for the hint, I gave it a try but I can't see any difference. Anyway the latest package distributes all the font formats (in different .deb files), so the user will be able to chose what's best in the specific case. See also this discussion with the upstream developer: https://github.com/chrissimpkins/Hack/issues/84 Cheers, Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From appzo at appo.org Sat Sep 12 15:08:34 2015 From: appzo at appo.org (AppStore) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:08:34 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] AppStore id has been frozen. Message-ID: <0CA65C586DBD4073BB157D0C2D61CB36@ATG-SYSLOG-01> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vladimirgo7we at myrambler.ru Sat Sep 12 23:28:04 2015 From: vladimirgo7we at myrambler.ru (Facebook) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 03:28:04 +0400 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?cp1251?b?z/Do4uXy+w==?= Message-ID: <4EB4F1189C4866C5191C55E89C75A175@xrsazgn.oxc> fac?book ???? ???????? ??? ?????????: ?????????????, ??????? ???? ????? ?????? ? ?????? ????? 1000$ - ????? ? ???? ??????????? ???????! ????? ?? ?????? ??????? $1000 ????????? ???? ?????????? ?? pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org. ???? ?? ?? ?????? ???????? ??? ??. ?????? ?? Facebook, ???? ???? ?? ?? ??????, ????? ??? ????? ????????????? ??? ???????? ???????????? ??????, ??????????, ?????????? ?? ????????. Facebook, Inc., Attention: Department 1154, PO Box 495494, Palo Alto, CA 364266 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From GPENNICK at houstonisd.org Sun Sep 13 05:21:59 2015 From: GPENNICK at houstonisd.org (Pennick, Giovanna H) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 00:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Congratulations!!! Confirm Mail Receipt. Message-ID: <1B9F6C235877954686CEF4D1C502A778047A6ADA60@EXPRODMB03.AD.HISD.ORG> Hello, You have been selected to receive ?950,000.00 EURO as charity donations/aid of the Qatar Foundation. Reply to Email: qtfdorg at mail2consultant.com for more information and claims. Yours sincerely, Engineer Saad Al Muhannadi. Reply to: qtfdorg at mail2consultant.com President of the Qatar Foundation. From oreshak at mailsad.net Tue Sep 15 00:27:10 2015 From: oreshak at mailsad.net (Oreshak) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 03:27:10 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0J/QvtC80LDQs9Cw0LnRgtC1ISDQoNCw0Lc=?= =?utf-8?b?0YfQuNGB0YLQstCw0LzQtSDRgdC4INGB0LrQu9Cw0LTQsCE=?= Message-ID: <191be68c8d9ceb7f574ff6edb3a95037@statmails.eu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From denise.vargas at sernageomin.cl Tue Sep 15 09:46:20 2015 From: denise.vargas at sernageomin.cl (EVERYDAY LOANS LTD) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 05:46:20 -0400 (CLT) Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0LfQsNC10Lw=?= Message-ID: <018b2a92-c8e5-46d8-b31b-db9c7dcb732b@zimbra> ????????? ?-/???????!! ??? ? Renee Miles ?? EVERYDAY LOANS LTD ???????????, ?? ??????? ?? UK. ??? ? ?? ?? ?? ??? ??, EVERYDAY LOANS ???? ?? ??????? ??? ?? ????? ????????. ??? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ?? ?????????? ?? ????????, ??????????? ??? ?????, ?? ????? ????? ?? ?? ??????????? ??????? ???????, ????????? ??? ???????? ????? ?????, ??? ???????? ??????? ??? ???????? ??, ? ????? ?? ????????? ?????? ?????? ?? EVERYDAY LOANS. ??? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ?????????????, ?????? ? ??????? ??????, ?? ??? ??? cash.Our ? ?? ?? ??????? ??????????? ?? ????????? ?? ????? ??????, ??? ?????? ??????? ?? ????? ?????? ?? 2%. ????????????? ?? ??? ??? ?????????????? ?? ?????? ?????? ?? ?????: everydayliving001 at gmail.com ??? everyday_living at webadicta.org ???: ???: ?????: ????? ? ????????: ???????????: ???: ?? ??????????, Renee Mile's. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nwillis at glyphography.com Tue Sep 15 23:08:34 2015 From: nwillis at glyphography.com (Nathan Willis) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:08:34 -0500 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#774148: Reported upstream Message-ID: I've reported this upstream at https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2490 Nate -- nathan.p.willis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mmoney at nasmetka.eu Wed Sep 16 01:33:30 2015 From: mmoney at nasmetka.eu (Mmoney.bg) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:33:30 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0JLQt9C10LzQtdGC0LUgMzAwINC70LIuINC6?= =?utf-8?b?0YDQtdC00LjRgiDQuCDQstGK0YDQvdC10YLQtSAzMDAg0LvQtdCy0LAh?= Message-ID: <43296b95b91f8e44d9dc359e9708547b@ideabg.eu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Wed Sep 16 04:57:07 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:57:07 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processed: bug 774148 is forwarded to https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2490 References: <1442378875-2410-bts-bubulle@debian.org> Message-ID: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 774148 https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2490 Bug #774148 [fontforge] fontforge: please propagate creation and modification times to generated ttf files Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2490'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 774148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774148 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems From noreply at release.debian.org Wed Sep 16 16:39:13 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:39:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] birdfont 2.11.3-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the birdfont source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.11.2-1 Current version: 2.11.3-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From info at kuma.pop-mail.info Thu Sep 17 02:46:16 2015 From: info at kuma.pop-mail.info (=?utf-8?Q?=D0=A0=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B8=D1=86=D0=B0_=D0=A2?= =?utf-8?Q?=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B0?=) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:46:16 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0J3QvtCy0Lgg0LLRitC30LzQvtC20L3QvtGB?= =?utf-8?b?0YLQuCDQt9CwINGA0LDQsdC+0YLQsA==?= Message-ID: , CTeam . , . * Ако търсите нова работа, careers at cteam.bg , , . * индивидуален или групов коучинг, . ralitsa.todorova at cteam.bg iva.todorova at cteam.bg . * : * * * HR * * OFFICE at CTEAM.BG . CTeam, , . . . . 40, . 2 , . http://wizz.massmail-solutions.com/index.php/campaigns/jj053rglz2723/track-url/aj744nj9dkeaa/84b1064799142ba54d71300b3ed60053ccb53cf8. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wdg at debian.org Thu Sep 17 06:46:18 2015 From: wdg at debian.org (Daniel Glassey) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:46:18 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#768232: fonts-sil-andika: conffiles not removed Message-ID: <20150917064618.GA17686@meegopad-debian.dazedgeek.com> Hi, I'm preparing the new 5.000 package of fonts-sil-andika. I noticed there was a debian/links file: etc/fonts/conf.avail/65-andika.conf etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf I'd guess that's what is keeping the symlink around. Regards, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Thu Sep 17 06:52:11 2015 From: pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:52:11 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#687172: Pending fixes for bugs in the fonts-sil-andika package Message-ID: tag 687172 + pending thanks Some bugs in the fonts-sil-andika package are closed in revision 4e98c2c9b556d98e4f0c31e0d90d63bf99ced334 in branch 'master' by Christian Perrier The full diff can be seen at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-fonts/fonts-sil-andika.git;a=commitdiff;h=4e98c2c Commit message: Closes: #687172 - can only contain one element. To implement disjunction, duplicate the block and vary the contents of . Here we reduce the number of branches by comparing for "contains" "Andika Design Review" (previously "Andika Design Review [A-H]") - can only alias one family at a time. Duplicate and vary the name being aliased. From pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Thu Sep 17 06:52:15 2015 From: pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:52:15 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#687172: Pending fixes for bugs in the fonts-sil-andika package Message-ID: tag 687172 + pending thanks Some bugs in the fonts-sil-andika package are closed in revision 4e98c2c9b556d98e4f0c31e0d90d63bf99ced334 in branch 'master' by Christian Perrier The full diff can be seen at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-fonts/fonts-sil-andika.git;a=commitdiff;h=4e98c2c Commit message: Closes: #687172 - can only contain one element. To implement disjunction, duplicate the block and vary the contents of . Here we reduce the number of branches by comparing for "contains" "Andika Design Review" (previously "Andika Design Review [A-H]") - can only alias one family at a time. Duplicate and vary the name being aliased. From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Sep 17 06:54:13 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:54:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the fonts-sil-andika package References: Message-ID: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tag 687172 + pending Bug #687172 [fonts-sil-andika] Fontconfig file warnings Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 687172: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687172 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Sep 17 06:54:16 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:54:16 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the fonts-sil-andika package References: Message-ID: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tag 687172 + pending Bug #687172 [fonts-sil-andika] Fontconfig file warnings Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #687172 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 687172: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687172 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems From fabian at debian.org Thu Sep 17 06:57:09 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:57:09 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#768232: Bug#768232: fonts-sil-andika: conffiles not removed In-Reply-To: <20150917064618.GA17686@meegopad-debian.dazedgeek.com> References: <20150917064618.GA17686@meegopad-debian.dazedgeek.com> Message-ID: <1442473029.2207.3.camel@debian.org> Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2015, 07:46 +0100 schrieb Daniel Glassey: > I'd guess that's what is keeping the symlink around. I believe you did the right thing with introducing the debian/maintscript file to remove them remnants of this config file. - Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 09:36:14 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:36:14 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:10:15 +0100 Source: fonts-sil-andika Binary: fonts-sil-andika Architecture: source all Version: 5.000-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Daniel Glassey Description: fonts-sil-andika - extended smart Unicode Latin/Greek font family for literacy Closes: 768232 Changes: fonts-sil-andika (5.000-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release * d/watch: upstream releases are done manually and access to the tarballs is not automated * delete outdated d/README.source * d/control: edit description * now includes woff webfont * really remove 65-andika.conf, Closes: #768232 delete d/links with useless symlink d/maintscript to remove 65-andika.conf * d/copyright: update years and upstream contact Checksums-Sha1: d085f7d7805efa116eb2f779c9f6985185fccffb 2067 fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1.dsc affc0b2e21d2d3573ec53da057ea8f93c5b06a73 2382056 fonts-sil-andika_5.000.orig.tar.xz cdef1016036ff0c175e97b671410f2f5fa52b810 6548 fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz cb02a3ec1cd0aedb039e7540410580f1cac5e80d 1643496 fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 9ba96c31ec40e64686f1747843ee5795bb103e3cc7cc9866d5ef70821eedc29a 2067 fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1.dsc bbf436e02f674300403e3e029f1bf5c560e26fcb9c495709a752e795c20c430f 2382056 fonts-sil-andika_5.000.orig.tar.xz c62f1849d6b4da6463554448f06fce14adae5323d686dd44d8711ab1c4b58f1f 6548 fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz 860092388260ecff077d62a2e7eeea915151ef2a75ec1f2b9861226f61bceeb0 1643496 fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1_all.deb Files: fcec49e50d3752600cc349ddaa7d4f51 2067 fonts optional fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1.dsc 5ef2df4f9889c16fefcb66f66a4f22a7 2382056 fonts optional fonts-sil-andika_5.000.orig.tar.xz f5c2159a570fbf6b060220043c456bb5 6548 fonts optional fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz 5c51df9623fe05d4cd5ca37f210ad0fb 1643496 fonts optional fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV+oH5AAoJEASbEDOvBgxaaKYP/i5JR6VsuiMK8RgHcL3/PCim HnKUCNjKqNoQ72n2x8zuRJ+PzkpQIwFTfv4TleAwlUHmGkaSgWNIsZ0Y6HYZGEky Dt8q+ZZIdNSM5WBo6flu8GdSFjb6EhwBmDvEvbA9ZHUbgdTLTM+iA/eXl60mTCw5 Ylwq4Af2XK7KtYL9wmbb4X9Y8OElfY0DdCUyJ33dajJy7WgWfbr3WdpDO4W5j951 +KULv2mDkehPa10S/Tr/T+bcxh7qv9FlkKjO6nX0Nn0tEHw7o1cx94halNUfbxAe NGRnnKoLPviBKp7sIYN/tvjzK130KI4W9KSdlMAJppF7evDA7D1XE6MDcYGYVDUL cB7Ii0fve6MDcN25QFDzfZyndQEWyi6BJV6c1T4+Tm79NQFpyGon5jrsUWJPBnOt p8dkyGcazfYoMsernN8DJC4y0HxzQYN9HdYBMcXyjTfppkH8wgIpqEMXNqkAGe/T 7sgVWTrB8Hw5VXYFuFJUdmtmdnWkUrxkmDnM6EjR5MfEzHfCCSQ5eL1jZOXdfwjw 8WkrNT41FW0Iw6nP+1bdZZkk+ma3OkuytciWrmdOIbhGGYaEu0pt0ogYSNDQaPaV 9KiwDAo4OE8lk6aN40eeV+QcWzmMRy0kx3AoeaUnRb8+ecfV2rZmwWTU9Bshrk/2 Sd18Pg493RMsZiFuPMvD =x8cr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Sep 17 09:39:05 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:39:05 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#768232: marked as done (fonts-sil-andika: conffiles not removed) References: <1415240222.10910.31.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: Your message dated Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:36:14 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#768232: fixed in fonts-sil-andika 5.000-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #768232, regarding fonts-sil-andika: conffiles not removed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 768232: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768232 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Paul Wise Subject: fonts-sil-andika: conffiles not removed Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 10:17:02 +0800 Size: 5755 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Daniel Glassey Subject: Bug#768232: fixed in fonts-sil-andika 5.000-1 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:36:14 +0000 Size: 5845 URL: From wdg at debian.org Thu Sep 17 10:01:24 2015 From: wdg at debian.org (Daniel Glassey) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:01:24 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] errors when pushing to git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20150917100123.GA25554@meegopad-debian.dazedgeek.com> Hi, I'm getting errors like below when I push to git. Anyone know what to fix? Daniel $ git push Counting objects: 21, done. Delta compression using up to 2 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (21/21), done. Writing objects: 100% (21/21), 2.15 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 21 (delta 15), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: Traceback (most recent call last): remote: File "/usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice", line 30, in remote: environment = git_multimail.GenericEnvironment(config=config) remote: File "/srv/git.debian.org/bin/git_multimail.py", line 1960, in __init__ remote: super(ProjectdescEnvironmentMixin, self).__init__(**kw) remote: File "/srv/git.debian.org/bin/git_multimail.py", line 1854, in __init__ remote: **kw remote: File "/srv/git.debian.org/bin/git_multimail.py", line 1825, in __init__ remote: config=config, **kw remote: File "/srv/git.debian.org/bin/git_multimail.py", line 1914, in __init__ remote: config, 'refchangelist', 'mailinglist', remote: File "/srv/git.debian.org/bin/git_multimail.py", line 1949, in _get_recipients remote: 'The list of recipients for %s is not configured.\n%s' % (names[0], hint) remote: git_multimail.ConfigurationException: The list of recipients for refchangelist is not configured. remote: Please set one of the following: remote: "multimailhook.refchangelist" remote: "multimailhook.mailinglist" remote: Traceback (most recent call last): remote: File "/usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice", line 30, in remote: environment = git_multimail.GenericEnvironment(config=config) remote: File "/srv/git.debian.org/bin/git_multimail.py", line 1960, in __init__ remote: super(ProjectdescEnvironmentMixin, self).__init__(**kw) remote: File "/srv/git.debian.org/bin/git_multimail.py", line 1854, in __init__ remote: **kw remote: File "/srv/git.debian.org/bin/git_multimail.py", line 1825, in __init__ remote: config=config, **kw remote: File "/srv/git.debian.org/bin/git_multimail.py", line 1914, in __init__ remote: config, 'refchangelist', 'mailinglist', remote: File "/srv/git.debian.org/bin/git_multimail.py", line 1949, in _get_recipients remote: 'The list of recipients for %s is not configured.\n%s' % (names[0], hint) remote: git_multimail.ConfigurationException: The list of recipients for refchangelist is not configured. remote: Please set one of the following: remote: "multimailhook.refchangelist" remote: "multimailhook.mailinglist" To ssh://wdg at git.debian.org/git/pkg-fonts/fonts-sil-andika.git 9aff007..50bb6ca master -> master -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 09:32:52 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:32:52 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1.dsc fonts-sil-andika_5.000.orig.tar.xz fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-andika_5.000-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 10:33:16 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:33:16 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1.dsc fonts-sil-doulos_5.000.orig.tar.xz fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 10:33:59 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:33:59 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:34:58 +0100 Source: fonts-sil-doulos Binary: fonts-sil-doulos Architecture: source all Version: 5.000-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Daniel Glassey Description: fonts-sil-doulos - smart Unicode font for Latin and Cyrillic scripts Changes: fonts-sil-doulos (5.000-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version * now includes woff webfont * Update Standards to 3.9.6 (no changes) * d/copyright: fix formatting, years, upstream contact Checksums-Sha1: b43ec69335002251d95a196a8bd9489f9445f9f5 2088 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1.dsc fa7be79ca1d22f476f26209ee0ed4068c6ddd553 2287284 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000.orig.tar.xz 3819509e23d9b95761ffc33974867aa43b42eabe 5844 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz bb0396e1ac417695d142b35b27fc3530a0b13275 1774452 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: cfa9f17a84ee9d09aaaad5fd289ee4ecfd3ce5dc255a0953c24ab55c5603ca01 2088 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1.dsc 2ba9622e7a199aa95bbb921639a12b7d85165caa69c96f79ac0cff26dc41cf6d 2287284 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000.orig.tar.xz fed568e32ca5eee961a5a02e8de7677c58af038f146f03e2451183a061c59f2d 5844 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz f6adeb5787a5f2f315153a8dc3fe0ed9c91d8272eacff1792c7bdb9d26f0c254 1774452 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1_all.deb Files: 7eb7f73e167aa53f52376c514a11dbeb 2088 fonts optional fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1.dsc ddee3d9e9140e2ad23b60d59519b4021 2287284 fonts optional fonts-sil-doulos_5.000.orig.tar.xz a661f91e3c55c87b7d6fee690de6cb88 5844 fonts optional fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz a78d18d4ae5d8cfac00e42cac81a085f 1774452 fonts optional fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-1_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV+pBzAAoJEASbEDOvBgxavXwP/3TYXFIsOibOwi447jk5WAJj UV/5P4cLKmCgTYLePdO/zCvzBlRD76KRD8mZetfSsjxeqX1FqoV6v9GnrVO1nlAz xtxLDq0cnTibp/T+se3pqqm+Cpn51Iz/MFWDS7SnnBNlM0BQHgsQB5PRj9lTWwHr 4PjjtNuo2tkYnXoF/KXnjiqAx8fZqG1KwOZ9imspwCeE8+mO2nk6swhogzd0mVQI 9IpFut5OfTPhXrBWSOLLZGE0LJMqYGRZL13CVDjLWGHD6bioQhC8eUlA/gjTJcU0 AN5V+ZaqGYNSJfh4SD4WfbHtV+Mj8PCdOT9gBlNV95r464OVSIYOvsk/7O/cJdMb SBq0JjwYLNxGsh74pXFiidA2LWPuq259ExnmKNqFHKBYirYjr3oikKueTiRG3f6W Z1zYytWwoOhoqKZY9rSNTZ2uxXmDxerA8Rcn2N4z6dCwD6Nq6Ow6KYknrbWy8gcd 1op0w8/OlDU+zuJ+0nr0j2/e1dYGP2nNWi8JszuIOa42SMTQP6myH47kj/Cd2iab UQuSGgi+ZFtCuVKJ6S3Ni5qMuEJFHkL9bd1Q2YQ/TVGB+kxJaT9BM696zzENSXqV WlV7lDLrg841aEKxTmPQdPLNOoMAkFgLV0CGVkOdhnkr0CPATK/WYs0kGxL74Snx 9UxHIPbtOJfN6MkKWHkt =3djI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 12:43:58 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:43:58 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2.dsc fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 12:48:59 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:48:59 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1.dsc fonts-sil-charis_5.000.orig.tar.xz fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 12:49:31 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:49:31 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:36:47 +0100 Source: fonts-sil-doulos Binary: fonts-sil-doulos Architecture: source all Version: 5.000-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Daniel Glassey Description: fonts-sil-doulos - smart Unicode font for Latin and Cyrillic scripts Changes: fonts-sil-doulos (5.000-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * d/control: change Suggests to libgraphite2-3 Checksums-Sha1: caef3321ee8295e6fe55d40d5cdac3dcc66ed65b 2088 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2.dsc 51198ce5a64420f3ff2a23a564b42c30d32b4ea5 5872 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz 93836270453ec0e3b8a24b13ba6e779eee395062 1774462 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 27ee17eff9b4dd23fa87ea7337339ae6fd0ecc4e9a3e564fc9fd5075d3504700 2088 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2.dsc 62de4f9cdd67bad3b29766937e43351b3dfd2df6f426b8ad654b2cba01cd6d57 5872 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz b57f5a7734509a5823221d55e49baed9941624758f50a40b96c57c1f4cd54d91 1774462 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2_all.deb Files: 7e1f1401893ab40f338a4f02b30fc0a3 2088 fonts optional fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2.dsc 39a420245c4990025e9a1f5cbb8cd76c 5872 fonts optional fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz 4af012b80aee4bc3dd9ec0a62f2778e3 1774462 fonts optional fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV+rC+AAoJEASbEDOvBgxayGgQAJdAZ8XL40iNURldrftjL8F0 W0Z/FvErRXR9l6cpHi2g4plvj4pMXq+9c/xNu+mbKgSPorg9RXJqO2iGSx5rRDsf RiScrpgNpC0igHrjboi3aw2+mz47C6VVOHoWHIeGAgfiBG/6OgKchRUHN9ZXAMbD o54a57UyriSOER39X5x1t4IFqi4SE1wjN9oKq+8FayBkzx6Uk84CXakt8hcI3ko4 JRV0XKyQtT8RBRbxj0ESy8RMsq+FtA46X/bG2Qf3wS/bzFEiq3ymkLIK+BBwJHLZ 9UXIBPlwfvlfC5tQmfyG9K/dyj1IYFIkanyITZ2zytZMjmH5Qsch+JuCwSXDHRyY NqLJ/YEqT4RWCvmR2iLyY9l9oV/pherMhIQEsxgzkq8QBla+pa+XRQcSxqFzjxBX VXAKPteVxpLeYfcy9SZHxlVMQrLb4NrZm7EJSeuhzCC0BySyromfYrHPJQCHklS5 9gx0nkBEv9UP+jJGEDynQcPIGNT5/QKSNw7vSA/jvOmQ+xZUwfW9Os7So/pu3lLf u9T0Pcqyd/mtV+3M8HN11CT+Ey+yhsn0oHYOwz8RmhhzJnwRYD7TsTfQ7Tm6piRp w0xLmS501DkjQVgZ93uUx9GNFpAjtLKMKmhqiAmk/CQ4/+hPukBWMGOwaSiFA25E kh/L16ZU16TOhzzgp/90 =t47S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 13:03:50 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:03:50 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:34:15 +0100 Source: fonts-sil-charis Binary: fonts-sil-charis Architecture: source all Version: 5.000-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Daniel Glassey Description: fonts-sil-charis - smart Unicode font family for Roman or Cyrillic-based writing sys Changes: fonts-sil-charis (5.000-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release * now includes woff webfont * d/copyright: fix formatting, years, upstream contact * standards 3.9.6 (no changes) * change Suggests to libgraphite2-3 Checksums-Sha1: 6b0141c5b57ed020a69e5ad05f9e2de688ffbcbe 2088 fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1.dsc 9a3e235f8d70bc139017d2a4d38fbef8f2b103fa 5883336 fonts-sil-charis_5.000.orig.tar.xz ff18dcfcbf595d0386636d77d89419ce88522946 6276 fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz 42783152644a9607526a179976f0d5bdf3d1e9e1 4089238 fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 95132a51425fc3c0262619b8406f04ed195850be1806ce623ed70464a24d5813 2088 fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1.dsc 83488db777adcfbf2f627005899dc8ef973d8377812a6e288841f93694a8145c 5883336 fonts-sil-charis_5.000.orig.tar.xz 7f39376c31e34e00780b6b058bcd566f75202820b405bf718a76e1e6852f9829 6276 fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz 1ec77c71cf43aa420844e744df43671652bc835d61c93601463d8c11609ed9aa 4089238 fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1_all.deb Files: b67b29a1db2ec7c1efac87c5587f4013 2088 fonts optional fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1.dsc b2de9ae3033c15a3a50fd655bef884ab 5883336 fonts optional fonts-sil-charis_5.000.orig.tar.xz cf10c1a15aae4107621d6383edc383a4 6276 fonts optional fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz 1b3ef825152c6ebda075e2a2970aa805 4089238 fonts optional fonts-sil-charis_5.000-1_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV+rBkAAoJEASbEDOvBgxa8YcP/AzrUAmezJFtKATlgHq6qXC0 Rh05g1n7FSp2prd62jSEWPHzzQ9h4OO1EUaEiENN4XKE6tG5J9lRbORidboELUDT tk55heDnWLSnHd4eFtOvfPd9hPT28n/dySXBqFwr41TrgTtDdTvSu3pFh1IvO3hg oDtUGMTLWtxqMUJt1QmTL3KuPtxsQyjIK8FgRHIQsSWr/aTbpdgjn0c7JHF1MJlD yf2pguRWtTSkC0qyQyPrkzwapPWVCVjREHp42sjX6Hy7aOPJCo8u5wA4Klo0dlBh srKai3jN/oYcRYAs6RO5ylNu600weqzPPk5+yhfT8i1iUOdplsImrX/lO7QHMaXt ootHSmMPSBIvQoLLTJHh00Sx1XldRshv+6kDmjSmYphJC6htzRYncyOYqaA7bG97 XhDlJGD+go8PNJQ4r2JoTMKg7dqnUEJiexaCkin8y2179qGY1Twn+c8+9qJDEfzP SuGk6gTQvyzAKKcD8Yk5GhBeo9Ht3WyCES600NhPIT0GxGev+nn7EGmg4yc0NN9h dac6DZxB0PLo8tsZm+AFkeUMQrjVyQXdofA0iCsXDB6u6amRQy0agk5WcW6utYpm 99vWZZ9nQd+VZ4UPLlSob8gnm2sfweC+sD1F2fH2FZHHAHfIz86TZWKWB16BZHwm EzbspqtDuM7c2Y/oFCgN =qYZm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From fabian at debian.org Thu Sep 17 13:26:29 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:26:29 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1442496389.17988.1.camel@debian.org> Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2015, 12:49 +0000 schrieb Debian FTP Masters: > * d/control: change Suggests to libgraphite2-3 I fail to see why a font package should suggest a shared library? - Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From wdg at debian.org Thu Sep 17 14:17:08 2015 From: wdg at debian.org (Daniel Glassey) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:17:08 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable In-Reply-To: <1442496389.17988.1.camel@debian.org> References: <1442496389.17988.1.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <20150917141708.GA6980@meegopad-debian.dazedgeek.com> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 03:26:29PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2015, 12:49 +0000 schrieb Debian FTP Masters: > > * d/control: change Suggests to libgraphite2-3 > > I fail to see why a font package should suggest a shared library? Hi, I assume that Nico wanted to indicate that the font had graphite support so put in a suggests for pango-graphite and the library. I don't mind if that stays or goes, though I find it one handy way to see what graphite enabled fonts are around. Regards, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 15:19:30 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:19:30 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1.dsc fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000.orig.tar.xz fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 15:34:59 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:34:59 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:23:53 +0100 Source: fonts-sil-gentiumplus Binary: fonts-sil-gentiumplus Architecture: source all Version: 5.000-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Daniel Glassey Description: fonts-sil-gentiumplus - extended smart font family for Latin, Greek and Cyrillic Changes: fonts-sil-gentiumplus (5.000-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version * now includes woff webfont * d/copyright: fix formatting, years, upstream contact * Standards 3.9.6 (no changes) Checksums-Sha1: 2ba1f05193dd0e821c979d55e5a554783ba1f110 1972 fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1.dsc 486630a8017a734b17cf0b8b68b2f7278e960041 4100456 fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000.orig.tar.xz c46562623933800501b47237f3903c8f8ae18677 5376 fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz b8c00924fbd98a988ffa21a42b5745b7dd31cec6 2810710 fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 0bdd2e6b1f4788ff9860fb2122d4826cd6b1ad8563df9d9e5bc5852d2783aa24 1972 fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1.dsc ef638389429a517d5f5c47bee322c54f73f5c6b1fb28c5c8a4bfb2b6643306bc 4100456 fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000.orig.tar.xz a73936c0c420c9594be5e0403f972aeb1f60efa1fbb9024270d7e3e909ede0b2 5376 fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz 0ac9f3490026690e17fda818b3b2a94721bcfbc2514da274f57e2ba45f62e95c 2810710 fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1_all.deb Files: b5b88457beae3d0808479194662a0544 1972 fonts optional fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1.dsc f456f263af215443011f2956bdc6aba3 4100456 fonts optional fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000.orig.tar.xz 90e3524d78b301c05d9bf399d8c40a0a 5376 fonts optional fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz 6c51d8cf2b55f93aaebdc2f9837b590a 2810710 fonts optional fonts-sil-gentiumplus_5.000-1_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV+tOzAAoJEASbEDOvBgxaZOMP/0Kir+xBwAQlCTdz5SFdrYeS cwoKsl469hjBIhhqfMKhwGe4Y60PdwhjofqGeNw4do4KQl6mOg4wl1JVcqJBCDPz uI+2sDadIhGx02RISVdffcxcTSIPUtShGcDdPqp/6gnB2ITA91dM0j9Xm02kQQYA xGupe5/ruuVbre7ZJnb7toPDhJqyFZ86AACrCEkIduttX5uXuV1Up2vsRYNTvc20 gVSbQRNblRb5sR6qdRLZZU7ps/AuHz2/v409/k7PtwB6LKoWfiDSJ0AIlDdJFdjs 2UyJoGUs4ZZq4nYtX1OnSmLoP5BY3x1EZHx7ay8W0u+1Esg5f0a0UPAxwhkXRveF 34LKFooAdCJHr3FAdTpllTpee+yHpDNASVFxlOxCuNHstSRJ4/YeQ7kuvN1tDWRP 7oLjGZlrxLbBxLlRU+gFDk8PvPTUH8pTogzAvKOKWdOnjRCZ1PDIjVPz8rDZi4QG KobsJSTmZ2bIV0u3zyW8RbgWyiVyemDXXgH9MRvZiYJsv2guCxTDmYF5MeyMocz6 sgsdDaFh4kV8ZNvnqxwPYLHWSBuXfAh7ScPYb3KKSOCG7wtIJR742uUyuAItu9Bq KXqsFZV0/gcDiNtUs5WZkea+AZgh9cDhOSoDYkZMlF7Uhn7Luk1ADcT/vZt5hfJs P+IktrMpWIfzx8imNK9y =Qjhy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 17:15:01 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:15:01 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1.dsc fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100.orig.tar.xz fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-scheherazade-udeb_2.100-1_all.udeb fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 17:18:42 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:18:42 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:15:25 +0100 Source: fonts-sil-scheherazade Binary: fonts-sil-scheherazade fonts-sil-scheherazade-udeb Architecture: source all Version: 2.100-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Daniel Glassey Description: fonts-sil-scheherazade - smart Unicode font for Arabic fonts-sil-scheherazade-udeb - Scheherazade font for the graphical installer (udeb) Changes: fonts-sil-scheherazade (2.100-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version * now includes woff webfont * standards 3.9.6 (no changes) * update copyright years, format, upstream contact Checksums-Sha1: d8a0a383bf67c7912e776ae13ef8ba845dedc2f0 2293 fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1.dsc 1c36bf2e10eccd25c56fff2cd08cf136179823f5 942180 fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100.orig.tar.xz 6120b5c5e30af169fcd4ad76dad37a0144f3286b 6036 fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1.debian.tar.xz b169eb969f8176b9a6290dcd4f69ab48f8629c8a 127480 fonts-sil-scheherazade-udeb_2.100-1_all.udeb 45a10b1eb99e439d853eac6926c3aeba8001c972 962802 fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 91d428425194694d2d8b1011adf4e0c3c8ad8b671f99f4d822aa9d78843dfe14 2293 fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1.dsc 5ef8f2d29622bc43f67d52d88fbc40da4caa63d95ec47608cc91ad359ddb930d 942180 fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100.orig.tar.xz e04c58d7453a68f774a1acd64996db113e82228e6a7ee3a79da1a0d246ec631b 6036 fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1.debian.tar.xz d71eea60ce52b8d40428c0a400867ec2a711ea515627c72ccf519f5d46c17af7 127480 fonts-sil-scheherazade-udeb_2.100-1_all.udeb 83f61b7d7c40f43fdd10d077d1e2dafc85e21c14f7835aa3327131de9f4bfa33 962802 fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1_all.deb Files: c8b7e9ed93889d0fad31d04507672595 2293 fonts optional fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1.dsc 09a2d88d7e364a3090db784659bc7072 942180 fonts optional fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100.orig.tar.xz c81556bd59f5b569df41940614aaeced 6036 fonts optional fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1.debian.tar.xz 67c96d74b6387bb88fc97d10c4321a07 127480 debian-installer optional fonts-sil-scheherazade-udeb_2.100-1_all.udeb ed95de8d367b0cc108709aff18ed975b 962802 fonts optional fonts-sil-scheherazade_2.100-1_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV+t42AAoJEASbEDOvBgxaTecP/RmFQ+qOvqVS3+WIuLnpOHqp YAnDj7bvA3VZHXlDt7iXfkceaQry5ieRW3RSr7l1rP7rQHjj+YSKilHXYrqZA3Cy hR8yiYAix+zE6UU3IkpQZjx21/vlu54l711R7s/pmIE6xbsNl4iof7fjF2ibjHtt RVLAOosFE0CJ1bl8vb/OTgy6+OeZ4epnhCdGo/Cb98uc/tSu8TZewl9iZJ92rzzT Raj995bVHs0HSlCajGX00npSsI1Cd9WgGjUZbP+hbebFdgwYVXy9QG7NfqVWK1LI 4NbCeLzR4WKrQfjjDZNP0Oe7245xzc15kW5X5+A+AfZa9ECPKuoCWwvcMjXTiwwj Fbc9P1U//Ys6D9+sQkFl1ymgMvYBhPWUqVzErjpjniptUn3B+erbm62etUzIvqN8 4kJtLp27qpqU9M/le0qgEjCCcRBCfGoNOQ7Rn+bkye6OcvFp/Z8YAlIfznSGtLM9 KKhR8iVh02EroSMMeOWk1OZvHoXb8AJRG3qTOgDsZvQBYHkTNQUlqLnBJGH9Y8yb JXxdz45YN9cPQjYDYJKjquQ5u+y0HyRW7wqBvSHNdyqtbeHpDccgDzYcpNxnEj44 bVXWpNiJs9qpTGmgvvl3UEKzC1Q4/bPLJJ5eV4Xtj/tYoSfPncqv++uUmjgW5YIw uoNjBVaNkflnehtUZAVH =Pg0r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From wdg at debian.org Thu Sep 17 17:58:30 2015 From: wdg at debian.org (Daniel Glassey) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 18:58:30 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] ITP: fonts-sil-annapurnasil Message-ID: <20150917175829.GA5662@meegopad-debian.dazedgeek.com> >Hi, > >I'm interested in packaging this software. >I use the upstream font regularly and am familiar with Devanagari script very well. > >I'm a beginner who has been creating Debian packages for personal use for a while now, >but I would need some guidance on how to proceed further. > >Thanks, >--Parashara Kumar Dear Parashara, Thankyou for your offer to help. Would you still be interested in packaging the Annapurna font? Most discussion about font packaging is on the pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org mailing list. Regards, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From wdg at debian.org Thu Sep 17 18:05:09 2015 From: wdg at debian.org (Daniel Glassey) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 19:05:09 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] ITP: fonts-sil-javanese Message-ID: <20150917180509.GB5662@meegopad-debian.dazedgeek.com> You wrote: >Javanese script was added to the Unicode Standard in October, 2009 with >the release of version 5.2. [1] > >Recently, there is not any Javanese Unicode fonts in Debian / Ubuntu >main repository yet. So here I suggest some of Javanese Unicode fonts to >be packaged for Debian. > >The source for packaging is in: >https://code.launchpad.net/~bedouin/+junk/carakan-fonts > >The license for each fonts is based on SIL Open Font License. > >[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javanese_script#Unicode Dear slamet badwi, Thankyou for your suggestion to packaga Javanese fonts. Are you still interested in doing this? I think the package name should be fonts-javanese. fonts-sil-javanese would mean that the organisation SIL has created the fonts. The Debian Fonts Task Force mailing list is where most discussion about font packaging happens. Regards, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 18:45:36 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 18:45:36 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1.dsc fonts-sil-gentium_1.03.orig.tar.xz fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Thu Sep 17 18:48:56 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 18:48:56 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:25:20 +0100 Source: fonts-sil-gentium Binary: fonts-sil-gentium Architecture: source all Version: 20081126:1.03-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Daniel Glassey Description: fonts-sil-gentium - extended Unicode Latin font ("a typeface for the nations") Changes: fonts-sil-gentium (20081126:1.03-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release * no font change apart from filename change, but change of license to OFL 1.1 * d/docs: docs now .txt * standards 3.9.6 (no changes) * keep FONTLOG.txt with dh_installchangelogs -k * machine readable copyright Checksums-Sha1: b59a3d814a27b697838aadf5b999fcfe98210d88 2131 fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1.dsc 0bf5dcf19bbc68214604117be0278125772a58a6 428764 fonts-sil-gentium_1.03.orig.tar.xz 0ebeb9830660ed0479b9164bf31828999a711f93 6512 fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1.debian.tar.xz c15e64c91a73930fb619e840d00033788d94a164 251072 fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 10afc031dbd86b4904e432b71f5c8c57c28b3cb3cd5c3ca6912c2b0b4900fab4 2131 fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1.dsc 0754edaec5837f899caf9248496438cf5adc5f2795ee36ac19e49f08bdfd751c 428764 fonts-sil-gentium_1.03.orig.tar.xz 85991dd785a0d7a1bc91aa40dfc0f39f4666ae6835f526f2d619071334c05fb6 6512 fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1.debian.tar.xz 844aab8f1df0b047e212bec6063bc0c927793a7b4c64bb0bf1cfb56233b86ffc 251072 fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1_all.deb Files: 965ccedb2135e51a753128af4c318c67 2131 fonts optional fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1.dsc 893856152570e2b74b32ce86103430cb 428764 fonts optional fonts-sil-gentium_1.03.orig.tar.xz c086c596056eb4fe539e559f603da218 6512 fonts optional fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1.debian.tar.xz 9041f69ee8b44d1a6006c75ab39d06df 251072 fonts optional fonts-sil-gentium_1.03-1_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV+vzGAAoJEASbEDOvBgxaWKQP+gN/NokG08czJYI7O0YVqMPG nTV/ypw4DoU3pWE2NCAiwy177Q4ndlXCz0gbjnCpjCx/2TxVrr61pC4P4ACAqg1U 8Fv8Nm+Q0BH0iHFZfx3WwBGRXiWQgD60BxAxS1Ek6jGu/6suoOxpu8n7SrQWlMv6 4IzTbvu/vXQB+KMghx9IF3Dnhu4t7vA81DlY2srRv/XMTYFnVfGAmsElANo6JcC2 BL3VmFskfJxw0aGZhgKAR89clRdvg6PrkdOdWJKwyjJ7iu0GQV5dFLeKgrZ/sOuz +8lHdyY1IqCV7UDWHHFBrwlEU/AVVc4pqSpDPsWU31ZW8vKbfHlUgLesmN9jS7/J nqibDZ6pKivKHDLpyM/+91B4dTTuqh+Yelm1TFwCf0mZK2Dr3C3h7joKFqEVpqqr mXMUibyFfct+DhanWjAI85lOwD3YOnjtS5+nckE7P6dHmVnD76jbx8wjR+vucM08 gtWeugqwaeirJ0hyx6PsmONje3XA+wO8gOOJDwLBTO8iMhfEoex9rHfNzHKhkUot CPdTghlLi6nT/8OTyoUx26u20NEmXdSFaU69ox3rwWjCySxIgU5J0dVSkfj34tJG S4Y0e3stAZVUtzo9dut16pgmcRMFfnFQHIkkdFv4X+YlDKwDYcTnxiiFea3POAi4 TYtSfOvMPrtsgo+zcDu2 =CTTa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From lrqabg at izgodno.org Fri Sep 18 01:01:31 2015 From: lrqabg at izgodno.org (=?UTF-8?B?TFJRQSDQkdGK0LvQs9Cw0YDQuNGP?=) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 04:01:31 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0JrRg9GA0YHQvtCy0LUg0LfQsCDQvdC+0LI=?= =?utf-8?b?0LjRgtC1INC/0YDQvtC80LXQvdC4INC90LAg0YHRgtCw0L3QtNCw0YA=?= =?utf-8?b?0YLQuNGC0LUgSVNPIDkwMDEg0LggSVNPIDE0MDAx?= Message-ID: <471821315f1cc8b9d3e33df431f5285a@statsystem.eu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Fri Sep 18 07:09:14 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 07:09:14 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#798805: Status of this bug? References: <20150918070708.GA23471@x> Message-ID: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 798805 fonts-cantarell Bug #798805 [libfreetype6] libfreetype6 2.6-1 makes Cantarell blurry (CFF?) Bug reassigned from package 'libfreetype6' to 'fonts-cantarell'. No longer marked as found in versions freetype/2.6-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #798805 to the same values previously set > clone 798805 -1 Bug #798805 [fonts-cantarell] libfreetype6 2.6-1 makes Cantarell blurry (CFF?) Bug 798805 cloned as bug 799345 > retitle 798805 fonts-cantarell: Switch to autohinting to work around blurry rendering with CFF Bug #798805 [fonts-cantarell] libfreetype6 2.6-1 makes Cantarell blurry (CFF?) Changed Bug title to 'fonts-cantarell: Switch to autohinting to work around blurry rendering with CFF' from 'libfreetype6 2.6-1 makes Cantarell blurry (CFF?)' > severity 798805 grave Bug #798805 [fonts-cantarell] fonts-cantarell: Switch to autohinting to work around blurry rendering with CFF Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' > tags 798805 + patch # Include fontconfig below in 31-cantarell.conf Unknown tag/s: #, Include, fontconfig, , below, in, 31-cantarell.conf. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n newcomer etch etch-ignore lenny lenny-ignore squeeze squeeze-ignore wheezy wheezy-ignore jessie jessie-ignore stretch stretch-ignore buster buster-ignore. Bug #798805 [fonts-cantarell] fonts-cantarell: Switch to autohinting to work around blurry rendering with CFF Added tag(s) patch. > retitle -1 fonts-cantarell: Hints do not accurately identify font stems Bug #799345 [fonts-cantarell] libfreetype6 2.6-1 makes Cantarell blurry (CFF?) Changed Bug title to 'fonts-cantarell: Hints do not accurately identify font stems' from 'libfreetype6 2.6-1 makes Cantarell blurry (CFF?)' > tags -1 + upstream Bug #799345 [fonts-cantarell] fonts-cantarell: Hints do not accurately identify font stems Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 798805: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798805 799345: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799345 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 09:39:19 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:39:19 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-1_source.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-1.dsc fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000.orig.tar.xz fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 10:20:29 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:20:29 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-1_source.changes REJECTED Message-ID: Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 10:34:26 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:34:26 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-1_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-1.dsc fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000.orig.tar.xz fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 10:34:53 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:34:53 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-1_amd64.changes is NEW Message-ID: binary:fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact is NEW. source:fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will recieve an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 10:44:28 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:44:28 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-1_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-1.dsc fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000.orig.tar.xz fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-1.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 10:48:52 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:48:52 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-1_amd64.changes is NEW Message-ID: binary:fonts-sil-andika-compact is NEW. source:fonts-sil-andika-compact is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will recieve an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html From pabs at debian.org Fri Sep 18 10:54:53 2015 From: pabs at debian.org (Paul Wise) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:54:53 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] ITP: fonts-sil-javanese In-Reply-To: <20150917180509.GB5662@meegopad-debian.dazedgeek.com> References: <20150917180509.GB5662@meegopad-debian.dazedgeek.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Daniel Glassey wrote: > You wrote: >>Javanese script was added to the Unicode Standard in October, 2009 with >>the release of version 5.2. [1] >> >>Recently, there is not any Javanese Unicode fonts in Debian / Ubuntu >>main repository yet. So here I suggest some of Javanese Unicode fonts to >>be packaged for Debian. >> >>The source for packaging is in: >>https://code.launchpad.net/~bedouin/+junk/carakan-fonts >> >>The license for each fonts is based on SIL Open Font License. >> >>[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javanese_script#Unicode > > Dear slamet badwi, > > Thankyou for your suggestion to packaga Javanese fonts. > Are you still interested in doing this? > > I think the package name should be fonts-javanese. fonts-sil-javanese would mean that the organisation SIL has > created the fonts. Probably the package name should reflect the name of the upstream project instead of the language name? I would suggest fonts-jawa, fonts-tuladhajejeg or similar: http://sites.google.com/site/jawaunicode/ https://sites.google.com/site/jawaunicode/TuladhaJejegGr_2.01.zip -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 12:05:04 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:05:04 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2.dsc fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 12:19:45 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:19:45 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:50:00 +0100 Source: fonts-sil-andika Binary: fonts-sil-andika Architecture: source all Version: 5.000-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Daniel Glassey Description: fonts-sil-andika - extended smart Unicode Latin/Greek font family for literacy Changes: fonts-sil-andika (5.000-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * copyright and reserved names is part of license Checksums-Sha1: 9eb66f830028ade0848b2026b39208cde6416fbc 2067 fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2.dsc cb48c967fbc7e76f1d6a92565965ed5b7ca17a4b 6540 fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz 7b52292b649ce494cc0abf6a8efff72ced581beb 1643172 fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: c7ea00d7470715148fbf59a7f425c13a29a034f7cefd4a909a65417c52688f3d 2067 fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2.dsc 9781d5c05f15db63114ee3273be2f7a6db34eb3de8996b0cab35d9abdd62eb4e 6540 fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz 65a763186644bde98fe7984ce778dafedb0cec3b2ac6a67121683e99f288469f 1643172 fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2_all.deb Files: 3af904ba12bed7204bf06ac7a729bba5 2067 fonts optional fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2.dsc 0831f14603f1cee6749febee9ff190b0 6540 fonts optional fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz 3556e09147e8d151121907157f8af66f 1643172 fonts optional fonts-sil-andika_5.000-2_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV+/zoAAoJEASbEDOvBgxaDhUP/jV12Z+Ra0Av+Mx7pN2+34FQ UYULNhxaGrB1gBV9EdqXrMgmqxvLfF3D9iWDmJhKbK3AEM7OnVoH0rrDfM/3CRLc LFd7deqE1+bdGoYs5rzr+0h6hg6hI2G/uyW6EB0UQ1fa/QmEaw/eY6SORlecDWMW /twL+mRnanlpvMwFS59ow230hpLl63OPIuHc5gJ+yGqNDFti7ktMRAKfzZX04gbU jqinyHz8qUYP0oTfUOaY6tUp+tn3DHqv1xDUgz3UbzcGiX8ZelNqq9QOLK13y0yB WooCrCqczHwBUHh9iRzsdzorYtWggzdlFglc39gcst5kSjsncRVCPrvLRYhgc3UE MLptvBY8avLeassiesg72NWBtL18vzJFcbSbXX4wLsdLO+23C+JdFT2gmeT2yfDk Wh862jxpFVZlAdbia1mkJZP6wPVNhyXvbGFURjEJmcAoYufgUAdOIu09YFa16hK0 h3I76/oktYDKKFimhr6BUk+Apxih/UvE5xbfu4cVRmlfMls//FD3wEYWIVTXtxpq Sn19/DGKSTi9IKNdjy9+1KQtwPqnzdIGK+JwfDAhqlpygJ2NGdj5EuvfRfGnse2O YTtyFNOTQbc1y/17Jc4J5BTGs6qnQLR/cjiDZo+3P2TG7WE5teTwa3WaEFoaxihT 3JLHhPGHrt7qseeDqtLX =QAFT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 12:50:19 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:50:19 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-2_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-2.dsc fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 13:00:20 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:00:20 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2.dsc fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 13:03:31 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:03:31 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000-2_amd64.changes is NEW Message-ID: binary:fonts-sil-andika-compact is NEW. source:fonts-sil-andika-compact is NEW. fonts-sil-andika-compact_5.000.orig.tar.xz is only available in NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will recieve an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 13:03:38 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:03:38 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:45:38 +0100 Source: fonts-sil-charis Binary: fonts-sil-charis Architecture: source all Version: 5.000-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Daniel Glassey Description: fonts-sil-charis - smart Unicode font family for Roman or Cyrillic-based writing sys Changes: fonts-sil-charis (5.000-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * copyright and reserved names is part of license Checksums-Sha1: 6d8ad51a8840cb30a502f0376a3f2ec76ce6f40c 2088 fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2.dsc f6c256a85632a9d11274a9b65cdb9a9eb9fee8b7 6344 fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz 18d6f12cdefbc94000d69282b61f95b794f46807 4088712 fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 7873a8148bf79cc1eef143af2ba8d7011513b7887cf8cd68cfe6c4e7a9a6a5f7 2088 fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2.dsc 2719ff5e76951792ca586762fc102e040e4b23407200c823e12bae3bec44060e 6344 fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz b6e721c68c9426f9b8692d7457265f3c477de84d80bdd9d8b968f245c75f3688 4088712 fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2_all.deb Files: 993615876eff3fe06555269723d175d2 2088 fonts optional fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2.dsc 1dd7a10abf30afee6a03b3ee6964e596 6344 fonts optional fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz 24e1f45bc0113a0af7b8b3547268bba9 4088712 fonts optional fonts-sil-charis_5.000-2_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV/Ap+AAoJEASbEDOvBgxadWAP/3L2s2t6lHilN8/0FwyKDr/e 4GuYU6+PfDUuu7XSPnGD8bwJ264VK4bHor1QCakNNq4vD4u0ADb+lk31jD2EOKft eVUQE6cDWByQW0abjlZ1zim/LaQi+BSAisH8hyFXT9U02SIhUr9qCo7sKvnZ/gDC 3GKMrFnPh252PKZON7fv8tMv1oiboz8VPp2DqfkLOLAgNQ6NkjCXrQREaW5kmzHN 06iFlaxS3KG7zutyHJN9/mowIKZAh6QOWoWEYkgkS8TuqwBGOORvqgzp7G8gO9Lg RyBk8S8RROf7elM46R2l/wVClAPjfnCRHktuiCL8szOQX4x28LB449AdLEW+lBNp m2hA2CKaMT7kUYgqrPXHWYMP9TSaKNN86ZreLz1sV1sTi+FKYp5Q3ekKOAzGnkyD n8JLPsnyX2blRs5kkcKEPDpP7Wp/1rJCOUvq3mn2hBHpa3Lx5t3y6Rmj5BN3vw4m 9PUhSruB+Pj2EKKwUs/eoIHB3RD57/DCOtnA3ITeF1qUVMZ3W8/j2xgkWgeMSkmU MOVxtRBIxsXKFLSs5w9zIv1EeBVRr7qjnuoik+soC9cZTbopuqDiOOVGitqqO/rm /sA7gfO+0eBl2/er2WGa1vWKPozFioNmdktHSIugugt5OAC2MXD2A+bT0cPxJqqI LcHWjbgVv+U2gWXPxbvr =iQoJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From ltaylor at Tnstate.edu Fri Sep 18 13:13:57 2015 From: ltaylor at Tnstate.edu (Taylor, Lillie) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:13:57 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] IT-Service provider. In-Reply-To: <7B7F001D2C0CCD42B54E23CAEBECAAAA3B1A7B57@HUM-ExchMB01.Tnstate.edu> References: <7B7F001D2C0CCD42B54E23CAEBECAAAA3B1A7B57@HUM-ExchMB01.Tnstate.edu> Message-ID: <7B7F001D2C0CCD42B54E23CAEBECAAAA3B1B808D@HUM-ExchMB01.Tnstate.edu> Dear mailbox user. New security updates need to be performed on our servers,due to the rate of phishing. Please click here and sign in to the IT Help server for maintenance and update of your mailbox. Please note that,this update is compulsory to all staff and student of this institution and please kindly forward this message to all your friends and groups on your mailbox. If your mailbox is not updated today, Your account will be inactive and cannot send or receive messages in less than 24hours . On behalf of IT, this IT Alert Notification was brought to you by the Help Desk in the Customer Support Department. This is a group email account and its been monitored 24/7, therefore, please do not ignore this notification, because its very compulsory. Sincerely. Admin Service. ?2015 Microsoft outlook. All rights reserved. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 13:40:29 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:40:29 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-2_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-2.dsc fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-2.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 13:48:48 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:48:48 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-2_amd64.changes is NEW Message-ID: binary:fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact is NEW. source:fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact is NEW. fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000.orig.tar.xz is only available in NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will recieve an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 17:49:19 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:49:19 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3.dsc fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3.debian.tar.xz fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 18 18:13:42 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:13:42 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:29:31 +0100 Source: fonts-sil-doulos Binary: fonts-sil-doulos Architecture: source all Version: 5.000-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Daniel Glassey Description: fonts-sil-doulos - smart Unicode font for Latin and Cyrillic scripts Changes: fonts-sil-doulos (5.000-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * copyright and reserved names is part of license Checksums-Sha1: 351043c0ea477624b32ebefe4ee7934707567d0d 2088 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3.dsc b78032cc0a6ab09e218339a551bd39869fd839ce 5976 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3.debian.tar.xz 0b61f35a397224633185c667178af83ecd84ceac 1774200 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 768191ca52b63280ff697fb0bbafc7a64b971b71dc2a66d6e1b08ec32e380362 2088 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3.dsc f13d8ff49868ad692a46427ead8b6f3f3a23268f4b0e33f6ffa8da72ad32692c 5976 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3.debian.tar.xz 3daa6c78937c24d5c2f35548d35f9be727c883fbcba47b16c34a68682790062d 1774200 fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3_all.deb Files: 4d6772a7842c4226261575ae552e56f7 2088 fonts optional fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3.dsc 8bb63386c3e653a496c65eda3bc78649 5976 fonts optional fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3.debian.tar.xz 6e1071a6db59031ceb04038a3f84d764 1774200 fonts optional fonts-sil-doulos_5.000-3_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV/E4nAAoJEASbEDOvBgxa8P4P/19MA/tsrs48mh5GjTAlErzf y5v3yN5UQP/+dYpMQGalxxD/MQ3NJe5AAwKM40MhCTX8xfsAGFVJMvw16WMtP7AY NYHGNrEzMVw4wGIXdctqz0+XDKMLmp1xM3djLuIT+SVqp4vs8yXefhwF2OMk0oYZ tPbPml5Jf6CwDzJY/RnovXaM32/dK9KxFaRbN7PNvIkieZJPdZGQVCXeRZDTM4n/ sE11qnnHseOwAIoB+KBZezF6AKzzKbWEaX+Uxr53zq93Nd93IQ01RT/U3gv13iIs DxAxzC0mvmvZk9FR/aJZFIYHadClJCT881UpQMJp0ckf4qL7LaKj7PKuZSMsF5R6 mCI8ViPy4xkbFrBYov3ekhTxFT21mjHjrRQ4lB/7zxAmnbTNnPEhjEFIjSBkuvTP IFzwlNB93ATj8bdApapqDOQDk7qX1Nfp482BlpBH+OZS3WDdmcwe1wp2mk9cR8rw s7qNrkqXOGmp2C2T9OMPrn6EPLc0R8992TAvQ+Irh/SAdE8AFVra3KY0OH/1OfX4 qO+lWjUOoK73ogQILcOvtTqy9Cm2N+iuRortW3lEdu0u4mr+/hddvJWG59BkY57I 6XPyRHFCPfINJyUZdqy5A4a1w+r5nmBr9z8b2k7QwGPiIU3TSISDzHjo5dcw74h2 An/jaepZdYBJ6SqEyyeN =MUU0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Sat Sep 19 11:55:36 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:55:36 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1.dsc fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915.orig.tar.xz fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1.debian.tar.xz fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Sat Sep 19 12:03:47 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:03:47 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 20:50:47 +0900 Source: fonts-sawarabi-mincho Binary: fonts-sawarabi-mincho Architecture: source all Version: 20150915-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Hideki Yamane Description: fonts-sawarabi-mincho - Japanese mincho font - Sawarabi Mincho font Changes: fonts-sawarabi-mincho (20150915-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Imported Upstream version 20150915 Checksums-Sha1: 5eb5cc53838463c441c96c2893a432de9e0b4fab 2072 fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1.dsc 13bc360b6dd812f42f47640272333f3b172457ac 366512 fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915.orig.tar.xz 13a178f2b5215ef0dd9bcdc38bf58fed4c9d42ef 8616 fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1.debian.tar.xz 3757bb3dd1bff91dd08be1996e987a8e3570af0d 379252 fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: c932dee696314b8632d01a9439649685151ddd90a0877928f81e81863b346661 2072 fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1.dsc fde75b691d12498bc780958ab3c32e25c1d8534fb967af60357330e256c0ab9b 366512 fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915.orig.tar.xz 81fde91029620ffc87d67e5313cf4cc5c42ba01290bc610cfb48686f572e3051 8616 fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1.debian.tar.xz 457c4bb124e0bde2555fe7ece31f8f4c76cc776b20cca9dc7d3a373decfaefd9 379252 fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1_all.deb Files: 12002ffa4e9740fc94fc5406c5e42141 2072 fonts optional fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1.dsc ef72756915211881e446d27728489af1 366512 fonts optional fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915.orig.tar.xz 88e3f8da94c15307a725c3ae9753f33a 8616 fonts optional fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1.debian.tar.xz eadd5df8dcd64fa42f84920136d5e818 379252 fonts optional fonts-sawarabi-mincho_20150915-1_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV/UyOAAoJEF0yjQgqqrFAg8MP/At+IdLhtgCSRa9CMF3S73H7 YfCcLhDlIrLvBQtyq1UQuz8702uJYaHPwpUEyg+iM0QkaAyZVgjOl30zm21+sDuq tcdYkmr1zH8x7i4ruiTW95zsKMQhueASOINT20begnQAgkH+/9Z4dyenPaUOpY+b gJFkiarBa8sMtLclWmsToXLkM5X42eYRA9PC1MuOvdl9FOdwhSkNTFRDW2MeJfc9 ek/wvjqsYRedzwDT8B8nlJZi46/DrkMT8KGoZHlYMDCmYyx8Fq/lh17nxLk3tvd2 h3y7moCEaM50T/orZ7A4lL+CvwJCrnQuc9sucTQPGnkk6vUkEf0wrWKr7fs7KtaU zlP54+5FT0Dik3Kj4fGd4+dyju6WsE5JkSloIiyTw8+BqwWZ0Y5Dkc6gbONKQJ8y 8opd5nXqJeCT5+clpbJIZWmf36FfmHxt5Z+M2p6VKi09I0hBWR0fIwpl4S11TQnb VZJ6sPOXmQQ5qbL2U5XvEx+pQ8ecWxQjR4DmCbHWtVnf4FUZgiIBveU8jjkgPmEo Gtw9O53EGFxQa/HjoSM3bl4Kjna+BnuPgZYdU3X5PlquI11UupxwoDVWwbMwU0+z DqXVBbf1pfrZ0PRtmUCUDQk/hSodIj/IUTkpOqaiN2NTb3lcO5pyB5wFmSEhkF+p aV/E/1qip5S/tCYJwGrC =KUdR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From noreply at release.debian.org Sun Sep 20 04:39:03 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing autoremoval watch) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 04:39:03 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] open-font-design-toolkit is marked for autoremoval from testing Message-ID: open-font-design-toolkit 1.5.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-10-26 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 798738: fontypython: Fonty Python doesn't start, throws wx._core.PyAssertionError From carine84_bougnon at outlook.fr Sun Sep 20 16:54:57 2015 From: carine84_bougnon at outlook.fr (Carine Bougnon) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:54:57 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] BONSOIR. Message-ID: Comment allez-vous? Bien j?esp?re. Moi ?a va J'aimerais avant tout m'excusez du d?rangement Je me pr?sente Carine Bougnon J'ai 32ans je fais 1m68 pour 57 KILOS Je suis une femme tr?s s?rieuse, honn?te, et sinc?re, dans tout ce que je fais dans la vie et surtout sympas cool attentionn?e et Qui a les pieds sur terre. Je suis c?libataire depuis 11 mois et j'ai une fille de 4 ans dont j'ai la garde. Cela ne vous d?range pas j?esp?re Moi non car j?adore les enfants.je suis ? la recherche l'?me s?ur un homme qui m?aimerait sinc?rement et en qui je placerais tout mon amour et toute ma confiance Je souhaite aussi une relation fond?e sur l?admiration, la confiance, le partage, la joie et la dur?e de l?amour relation durable sans prise de t?te avec une personne sinc?re s?rieuse fid?le sympas cool. Je vie ? paris et je suis originaire de paris Je suis fleuriste ? mon compte.La raison pour la quel je vous fait ce ?mail c'est juste que j'aimerais faire de nouvelle rencontre faire ample connaissance avec de nouvelle personne et voir si il a le feeling pr?voir une rencontre aussi j'aimerais vous dire que la distance n'est pas un obstacle pour moi. Je vous envoie deux de mes photos pour que vous sachiez que je suis sinc?re dans ma recherche,Tout en esp?rant avoir une r?ponse de vous. Au plaisir de vous lire bisous et bonne soir?e. Cordialement Carine. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CARINE1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 113169 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CARINE2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 36031 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lunar at debian.org Sun Sep 20 19:12:43 2015 From: lunar at debian.org (=?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Bobbio) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:12:43 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#774274: fontforge: please allow scripts to set the font modification time In-Reply-To: <20141231065831.GA24045@loar> References: <20141231065831.GA24045@loar> Message-ID: <20150920191243.GA30471@loar> J?r?my Bobbio: > For font compilation to be deterministic, we need a way to set the font > modification time to a defined value instead of the current time. > > We thus add a new function ?SetModificationTime? to the scripting language. > It takes a single string argument looking like ?2014-12-30 21:18:33?. Now that we have SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH defined [1], I wonder if this is the right approach. Just looking for the variable in the environment and using it as the font modification time sounds an easier approach to implement and to make many Debian packages reproducible without any modifications. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal -- Lunar .''`. lunar at debian.org : :? : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From lunar at debian.org Sun Sep 20 19:14:37 2015 From: lunar at debian.org (=?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my?= Bobbio) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:14:37 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#774148: Reported upstream In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20150920191437.GA30366@loar> Nathan Willis: > I've reported this upstream at > https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2490 Thanks! I'm glad to see this moving forward. :) -- Lunar .''`. lunar at debian.org : :? : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From para.shark at yahoo.in Sun Sep 20 19:19:56 2015 From: para.shark at yahoo.in (para.shark at yahoo.in) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#635902: ITP: fonts-sil-annapurnasil In-Reply-To: <20150917175829.GA5662@meegopad-debian.dazedgeek.com> References: <20150917175829.GA5662@meegopad-debian.dazedgeek.com> Message-ID: <1685238772.446721.1442776796267.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Hi Daniel, Unfortunately I don't have time to work on this anymore :( Sorry for the noise.? ?--Parashara On Thursday, 17 September 2015 9:00 PM, Daniel Glassey wrote: >Hi, > >I'm interested in packaging this software. >I use the upstream font regularly and am familiar with Devanagari script very well. > >I'm a beginner who has been creating Debian packages for personal use for a while now, >but I would need some guidance on how to proceed further. > >Thanks, >--Parashara Kumar Dear Parashara, Thankyou for your offer to help. Would you still be interested in packaging the Annapurna font? Most discussion about font packaging is on the pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org mailing list. Regards, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Sun Sep 20 19:45:39 2015 From: pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:45:39 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798226: Pending fixes for bugs in the fonts-pecita package Message-ID: tag 798226 + pending thanks Some bugs in the fonts-pecita package are closed in revision 78e781f5142d81111bb1c3603de1766508641f68 in branch 'master' by Christian Perrier The full diff can be seen at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-fonts/fonts-pecita.git;a=commitdiff;h=78e781f Commit message: New upstream version. Closes: #798226 From owner at bugs.debian.org Sun Sep 20 19:48:07 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:48:07 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the fonts-pecita package References: Message-ID: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tag 798226 + pending Bug #798226 [fonts-pecita] fonts-pecita: New upstream release available Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 798226: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798226 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Sun Sep 20 19:50:54 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:50:54 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-pecita_5.2-1_i386.changes Message-ID: fonts-pecita_5.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: fonts-pecita_5.2-1.dsc fonts-pecita_5.2.orig.tar.xz fonts-pecita_5.2-1.debian.tar.xz fonts-pecita_5.2-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Sun Sep 20 19:51:22 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:51:22 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-pecita_5.2-1_i386.changes Message-ID: fonts-pecita_5.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-pecita_5.2-1.dsc fonts-pecita_5.2.orig.tar.xz fonts-pecita_5.2-1.debian.tar.xz fonts-pecita_5.2-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Sun Sep 20 21:38:07 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:38:07 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-pecita_5.2-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:39:39 +0200 Source: fonts-pecita Binary: fonts-pecita Architecture: source all Version: 5.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Christian Perrier Description: fonts-pecita - OpenType hand-written font whose letters are connected Closes: 798226 Changes: fonts-pecita (5.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version. Closes: #798226 Checksums-Sha1: b45b47e4ca263a1d1ed6cf661b438a746f898087 2001 fonts-pecita_5.2-1.dsc 9f5c269a1fc01cf729ad5e1491737bb695ff4aaa 679868 fonts-pecita_5.2.orig.tar.xz 13a2b391836735e43917078637c0e46f7cc5e047 3812 fonts-pecita_5.2-1.debian.tar.xz bf0a8c86c90c5bb5a4a45c56eb7e849472a61761 395472 fonts-pecita_5.2-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 324d68ab9b5471f8b0699ba964bb750fc6b47ffc0afe4e677563f248d0257acc 2001 fonts-pecita_5.2-1.dsc 299e613484ab849e0ae208dc7a1855af57f064d69f864af7c7e9d73ef93ce19a 679868 fonts-pecita_5.2.orig.tar.xz 9d0dfd2fe1216d2cdbb8fc983913753ac2ca9f52d63f9c39a0fb909ff98d0ea1 3812 fonts-pecita_5.2-1.debian.tar.xz 970a4e6aadfa3350c42524d12492e836a05fc975139447eb585d3cc07f24dc7b 395472 fonts-pecita_5.2-1_all.deb Files: 7270aaaa3bf6678c20385c9862e68578 2001 fonts optional fonts-pecita_5.2-1.dsc 93b9531f55ddbf2525adac21458d8240 679868 fonts optional fonts-pecita_5.2.orig.tar.xz 66740cbdd4b355f65848eeefa5efd0d1 3812 fonts optional fonts-pecita_5.2-1.debian.tar.xz 9048e749f6952d0b35e16160808754ba 395472 fonts optional fonts-pecita_5.2-1_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV/wywAAoJEIcvcCxNbiWoMxwQAIXomLKx1pvm9ly9WaHVN3h2 vFrGpb/Hvp90CMPh0JOTqFKkvNU9OJSYtv1lVZSJRhIbTvZWt70tHAXfAvb75HTQ E8ywV2qFJk+sPQ7cfAP/iaAZEbIFHMuAG3S11bmbe22dSt2A+lZJnyBghG/UVHDv l4uQLe0jA9uxoWAzQrrBNb8ooAnhM1y8CVjCF7dIipKuWrELjRF/UNEFLoe7HEzV 1Giyery2hXVNtbL8yPBHtKDnTqN3HVEnQB2rsh+uDHTK11R2/jkuPoCaWLLaLMqv 3Ox0Iuxk9c7ra30spS18LENiEGDhiJ7EFwSwskgSCDWIM2x/YawguvqCN8u4ZA+L +VuGhv7i936YfEK40/ZPelLWVD3aB9dhAroP3fMTi9E4HdZ6E6dUTo6uOdOqHC2B SwgByduLvGDigRKncHR2PwV0HUunXBTmkhjy4ItS4atIwQqaCbcW/dCOf+6x127f RE9ugQTI+YJHjh0p9SAlcVDwVFBbCHqqddleOHSwV01JxRd0vd4w6+0NSt8uG6M7 zWW4zVH7NpW0ITud8VPsRN1mBJJfQ8E04WGbJFHtO5u0o7SpxpmNNVwg6AmGr/yB cIi0+7SnAtjftYGUJz8ebmHPkSVPXTC1x4ah3j3OUTssOR0fWEayK05gejex1bL2 w3WAerPZXS9be29v30F9 =6hDI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From owner at bugs.debian.org Sun Sep 20 21:42:43 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:42:43 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798226: marked as done (fonts-pecita: New upstream release available) References: Message-ID: Your message dated Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:38:07 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#798226: fixed in fonts-pecita 5.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #798226, regarding fonts-pecita: New upstream release available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 798226: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798226 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "pecita.net Archive Automatic Signing Key" Subject: fonts-pecita: New upstream release available Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 02:09:38 +0200 Size: 6248 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Christian Perrier Subject: Bug#798226: fixed in fonts-pecita 5.2-1 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:38:07 +0000 Size: 5362 URL: From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Mon Sep 21 07:18:29 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 07:18:29 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2.dsc fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2.debian.tar.xz fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Mon Sep 21 07:19:02 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 07:19:02 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:31:44 +0200 Source: fonts-cantarell Binary: fonts-cantarell Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.16-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Fabian Greffrath Description: fonts-cantarell - sans serif font family designed for on-screen readability Closes: 798805 Changes: fonts-cantarell (0.0.16-2) unstable; urgency=high . * Reportedly, Cantarell looks blurry when rendered with the CFF engine enabled in freetype 2.6-1. As a work-around, force auto-hinting in the fontconfig snippet (Closes: #798805). . * Clarify copyright of files in debian/*. * Run "wrap-and-sort -asb". * Update Uploaders field to my account. * Bump debhelper compat to 9. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6. Checksums-Sha1: 5005df460489c4427e4d8ccc71eb8e3c1d9e938b 2133 fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2.dsc b6c02a6949784f1752ac63de6c86406bcc9b1f27 5388 fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2.debian.tar.xz a081ca9ab248239c2afd5b2f728d578927190333 64598 fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 26f0888e879884f47251284137d61fb3a2842fd694ef03b65927cf6796b9e95a 2133 fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2.dsc 6284d427bf903dedd504f8f678384e26857dacc3a00633ec0fb507ef8dfb17c9 5388 fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2.debian.tar.xz 9aa972655e9ea67f115d08f674f1b9ea5472546925e777aa4b1347dcd32a6c72 64598 fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2_all.deb Files: 48035aae83c7e584b874764c651e4103 2133 fonts optional fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2.dsc c8560c1563e4a267c0c84d8383c5e508 5388 fonts optional fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2.debian.tar.xz 5c38e757022975342f54af436119191c 64598 fonts optional fonts-cantarell_0.0.16-2_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV/64UAAoJEMvqjpcMzVnfe58P/3ydbQgQZ06Vvhy+KSP9rECg b9fj5W2rNzgNlFg9AmC4ru/1hBlDFJVKv3403ax8frSbVTcbnINq6Jii7ca77I06 7KUmzYApwWCijHy7wpyfNaayVx5QSNlry1GaFqASV0/gnIW21LyL/jKVIwB1263e FSWQfeD1F7XaG3mtE+KqXTQwVa2mcrzEIwx/ouLfBIyJ7jrdPzpxXpH/1Vzp69XC 9YWMKWygZr+X1ECMH/RdjZLo1YX8V8U4p522SGtFpevLLvLRFivPynC28Q+bhr7b FzugOKGSk1HVWl4oG1izARaUpWigMzSqu1djQ8I+qiuMvU7vXWfsR6nAk0aP6gCL geVsHTtbfDxOu1URYyX6u8R3ZYgPeJ9KkqVO976q/B+50m3UnC7EtNZ9ZYCmu4ep iAy2SkugcchEBdVWZpMZlV5o5Ec2777QPNuFET67wbvET/piGEkWpwn/HjY29hti ewj6CCh48YMnwdJasi5qA1NUct0q8as6mAwMxbbDCGVhx6rLyOb+PacQ426D4w5M dvpSWVsyEjShkOjW0ABNK6HqMiB1Jt1AK37B6/JaS+z7n48DYan6ZmDN1VtCuzzK kvdkUNpKkVDiVmCxVIX6AuY/vIVSKClps23565VILP3bakKEEJpjqE0U3htTu9E5 lIsHXbcCkEihQ/a06JKJ =X6wj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From owner at bugs.debian.org Mon Sep 21 07:21:14 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 07:21:14 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798805: marked as done (fonts-cantarell: Switch to autohinting to work around blurry rendering with CFF) References: <20150913042400.1495.99188.reportbug@x> Message-ID: Your message dated Mon, 21 Sep 2015 07:19:02 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#798805: fixed in fonts-cantarell 0.0.16-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #798805, regarding fonts-cantarell: Switch to autohinting to work around blurry rendering with CFF to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 798805: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798805 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Josh Triplett Subject: libfreetype6 2.6-1 makes Cantarell blurry (CFF?) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:24:00 -0700 Size: 3295 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Fabian Greffrath Subject: Bug#798805: fixed in fonts-cantarell 0.0.16-2 Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 07:19:02 +0000 Size: 5541 URL: From fabian at debian.org Mon Sep 21 07:25:47 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:25:47 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#799345: Bug#798805: Status of this bug? In-Reply-To: <20150918070708.GA23471@x> References: <20150913043512.GA2404@x> <20150917164855.GA5744@cloud> <20150917232530.GA6294@virgil.dodds.net> <20150918070708.GA23471@x> Message-ID: <1442820347.12005.2.camel@debian.org> Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724190 On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:07:12 -0700 Josh Triplett wrote: > With the control commands at the top of this mail, I've generated two > such bugs against fonts-cantarell: one about its hints, and one to > include the above fontconfig snippet. It seems that upstream is already aware of the issues -- and even working on it given the latest activity in GIT. Thanks, Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Mon Sep 21 07:42:26 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 07:42:26 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#798805: Status of this bug? References: <1442820347.12005.2.camel@debian.org> <20150913042400.1495.99188.reportbug@x> Message-ID: Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724190 Bug #799345 [fonts-cantarell] fonts-cantarell: Hints do not accurately identify font stems Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724190'. -- 799345: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799345 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems From pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Mon Sep 21 07:56:25 2015 From: pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org (pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 07:56:25 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#798805: Pending fixes for bugs in the fonts-cantarell package Message-ID: tag 798805 + pending thanks Some bugs in the fonts-cantarell package are closed in revision 58e5678120d7d2439544688184fb3345351c109f in branch 'master' by Fabian Greffrath The full diff can be seen at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-fonts/fonts-cantarell.git;a=commitdiff;h=58e5678 Commit message: Reportedly, Cantarell looks blurry when rendered with the CFF engine enabled in freetype 2.6-1. As a work-around, force auto-hinting in the fontconfig snippet (Closes: #798805) From owner at bugs.debian.org Mon Sep 21 08:00:15 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:00:15 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the fonts-cantarell package References: Message-ID: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tag 798805 + pending Bug #798805 {Done: Fabian Greffrath } [fonts-cantarell] fonts-cantarell: Switch to autohinting to work around blurry rendering with CFF Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 798805: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798805 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems From bts-link-upstream at lists.alioth.debian.org Mon Sep 21 16:50:53 2015 From: bts-link-upstream at lists.alioth.debian.org (bts-link-upstream at lists.alioth.debian.org) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:50:53 -0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] [bts-link] source package fontforge Message-ID: <20150921165046.13410.98824.btslink@sonntag.debian.org> # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package fontforge # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html # user bts-link-upstream at lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #774148 (http://bugs.debian.org/774148) # Bug title: fontforge: please propagate creation and modification times to generated ttf files # * https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2490 # * remote status changed: (?) -> open usertags 774148 + status-open thanks From info at profusion.it Tue Sep 22 17:07:52 2015 From: info at profusion.it (=?utf-8?Q?Profusion=20=2D=20Eclectic=20Rock=20Band?=) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:07:52 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?q?Profusion=27s_=22Phersu=22_is_OUT!?= Message-ID: <0451ab674724e788de7e3b3506a743dc359.20150922170738@mail224.atl121.mcsv.net> http://profusion.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=0451ab674724e788de7e3b350&id=962eec4497&e=6a743dc359 We're pleased to announce that our album "Phersu" is finally out. You can order your copy right now from: http://profusion.us9.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=0451ab674724e788de7e3b350&id=0c03d22dd7&e=6a743dc359 or just click on button below. Thank You For Being Rock'n'Roll Profusion Click & Order (http://profusion.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=0451ab674724e788de7e3b350&id=818f62fe12&e=6a743dc359) ============================================================ ** (http://profusion.us9.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=0451ab674724e788de7e3b350&id=311a64fcf0&e=6a743dc359) Profusion - "Phersu" - Official Album Teaser Copyright ? 2015 Profusion (Band), All rights reserved. You are receiving this mail because in some way you are a part of Profusion's music family. Our mailing address is: Profusion (Band) Via Carlo Iozzi 14 Poggibonsi, SI 53036 Italy Want to change how you receive these emails? You can ** update your preferences (http://profusion.us9.list-manage1.com/profile?u=0451ab674724e788de7e3b350&id=b1383e8e06&e=6a743dc359) or ** unsubscribe from this list (http://profusion.us9.list-manage1.com/unsubscribe?u=0451ab674724e788de7e3b350&id=b1383e8e06&e=6a743dc359&c=ed04a8f3aa) Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp http://www.mailchimp.com/monkey-rewards/?utm_source=freemium_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=monkey_rewards&aid=0451ab674724e788de7e3b350&afl=1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noreply at release.debian.org Wed Sep 23 16:39:13 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:39:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-scheherazade 2.100-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the fonts-sil-scheherazade source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.020-1 Current version: 2.100-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Wed Sep 23 16:39:13 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:39:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-gentium 20081126:1.03-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the fonts-sil-gentium source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 20081126:1.02-13 Current version: 20081126:1.03-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Wed Sep 23 16:39:13 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:39:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-gentiumplus 5.000-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the fonts-sil-gentiumplus source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.510-web-2 Current version: 5.000-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Wed Sep 23 16:39:13 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:39:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-cantarell 0.0.16-2 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the fonts-cantarell source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.0.16-1 Current version: 0.0.16-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From neustoima at vipdeal.info Thu Sep 24 03:07:41 2015 From: neustoima at vipdeal.info (=?UTF-8?B?TmV1c3RvaW1hLmJnIC0g0KHQtdC60YHQuCDQsdC10LvRjNC+INC4INC00YDQtdGF0Lg=?=) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 06:07:41 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0J3QvtCy0Lgg0LPQvtGA0LXRidC4INC4INC9?= =?utf-8?b?0LXRgdGC0LDQvdC00LDRgNGC0L3QuCDRgdC10LrRgdC4INC/0YDQtdC0?= =?utf-8?b?0LvQvtC20LXQvdC40Y8h?= Message-ID: <014398915e88820702fded7152ae7d5a@sdelkata.biz> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noreply at release.debian.org Thu Sep 24 16:39:13 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:39:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-doulos 5.000-3 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the fonts-sil-doulos source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.112-1 Current version: 5.000-3 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Thu Sep 24 16:39:13 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:39:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-andika 5.000-2 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the fonts-sil-andika source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.004-2 Current version: 5.000-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Thu Sep 24 16:39:13 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:39:13 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sil-charis 5.000-2 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the fonts-sil-charis source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.114-1 Current version: 5.000-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From bts-link-upstream at lists.alioth.debian.org Thu Sep 24 17:08:15 2015 From: bts-link-upstream at lists.alioth.debian.org (bts-link-upstream at lists.alioth.debian.org) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:08:15 -0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] [bts-link] source package fonts-cantarell Message-ID: <20150924165228.22173.99775.btslink@sonntag.debian.org> # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package fonts-cantarell # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html # user bts-link-upstream at lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #799345 (http://bugs.debian.org/799345) # Bug title: fonts-cantarell: Hints do not accurately identify font stems # * http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724190 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 799345 + status-NEW thanks From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 25 06:57:33 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 06:57:33 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923-2_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923-2.dsc fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923-2.debian.tar.xz fonts-cns11643-kai_98.1+20150923-2_all.deb fonts-cns11643-sung_98.1+20150923-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 25 07:19:02 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 07:19:02 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923-2_amd64.changes REJECTED Message-ID: fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923-2.dsc: Refers to non-existing file 'fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923.orig.tar.xz' Perhaps you need to include the file in your upload? === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. From miwalter at outlook.fr Fri Sep 25 08:16:42 2015 From: miwalter at outlook.fr (mmiri walter) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:16:42 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?q?Bug=23762252=3A_Please_do_confirm?= =?utf-8?b?4oCP?= Message-ID: Dear Good friend, I bid you greetings. I am representing the Honourable Minister of Energy and Petroleum. We have a business that could be brought your way but the details shall be given when you confirm the receipt of this email. Personal Assistant Mmiri Walter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 25 08:33:07 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:33:07 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923-2_amd64.changes Message-ID: fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923-2.dsc fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923.orig.tar.xz fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923-2.debian.tar.xz fonts-cns11643-kai_98.1+20150923-2_all.deb fonts-cns11643-sung_98.1+20150923-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Sep 25 09:19:57 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:19:57 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-cns11643_98.1+20150923-2_amd64.changes is NEW Message-ID: binary:fonts-cns11643-kai is NEW. binary:fonts-cns11643-sung is NEW. source:fonts-cns11643 is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will recieve an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html From noreply at release.debian.org Fri Sep 25 16:39:15 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 16:39:15 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-sawarabi-mincho 20150915-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the fonts-sawarabi-mincho source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 20150815-1 Current version: 20150915-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From rita_michelle1970 at yahoo.co.jp Fri Sep 25 18:14:31 2015 From: rita_michelle1970 at yahoo.co.jp (Rita Michelle) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 03:14:31 +0900 (JST) Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCP0YwJiRKJGshIhsoQiAg?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJEkkTiRoJCYkSyRkJEMkRiQkJF4kOSQrISkbKEIgIBskQjtkGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJE5MXCRHO2QkTj80JEtIYSQ3JF8kSE5eJEchIztkJE5MPkEwGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJE8laiU/JV8lNyUnJWskRyQ5ISM7ZCROSzQkLyRKJEMkP0lXGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJE8hIiUrJSslKj4mP00kSEBQTH0ycTxSJE43QExzPFQkRyQ3GyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJD8hIxsoQiAgGyRCSGAkTzRKQzEkSklCNSQkTjhlJEs7YEs0GyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJDckXiQ3JD8hI0hgJE9APiUiJVUlaiUrJTMhPCVIJTglXCVvGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCITwlazZkOVQkTiQkJDokbCQrJEc7MEk0S3xKRjlxJUklayROGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCOWc3VyRyQk9AUSQ3JF4kNyQ/ISMbKEIgIBskQjpHNmEkRyRPGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCISI2ZDlUJE8hIjwrSiwkTjh9OkIkSztxNmIkckU+QXckOSRrGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJDMkSCQsJEckLSEiMzA5cT9NJHJEczYhJDkkayQ/JGEkSyEiGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCO2QkSyVhJUMlOyE8JTgkckF3JGokXiQ3JD8hIxsoQiAg?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCO2QkTyEiQC9JXDUhNFgkZDZkOVQkTj8mMHckTyEiO3E2YiRyGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCS1c8fSQ5JGtJLE1XJE8kIiRqJF4kOyRzISMbKEIgICA=?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJDckPyQsJEMkRiEiJTklPyVzJUkkZDtxNmIkcjx1JDE8aCRrGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJD8kYSRLISI7ZCROSzQkLUlXJE4zMDlxJVEhPCVIJUohPCRIGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJDckRkRzNS8kOSRrJDMkSCRyRyRMPyQ3JEYkJCReJDkhIxsoQiAg?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCO2QkTyQ9JGwkLCRKJGokXiQ5JCskbyQrJGkkSiQkGyhCIA==?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCISI4PTpfISIbKEIgGyRCSHM+bxsoQiAbJEIkS0lCNSQkRyQ5GyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJCwhIjtkJE8kIiRKJD8kTjxqJEskMyRONHA2YiRyMFFCdyQ5GyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJGwkUCEiJD0kbCRPPzU9RSRLO0hNUSQ5JGskMyRIJCw/QCRyGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCPy4kOCRGJCQkXiQ5ISMbKEIgIBskQiQiJEokPyRPO2Qkcj11GyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJDEkayQ/JGEkSzY9TCMkcjt9JEMkRiQkJGskMyRIJCwkbyQrGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJEMkRiQkJGs+bDlnISI7ZCRPQi4kJEpWPy4kNyRGJC8kQCQ1GyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJCQhIxsoQiAbJEIkIiRKJD8kTkIoO34kTjF+RXokcjx1JDEbKEI=?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCPGgkayQzJEgkcjR8QlQkNyRGGyhCIBskQjU5JDckLyQqNGobKEI=?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJCQkNyReJDkhIxsoQiAbJEIlaiU/JV8lNyUnJWsbKEI=?= Message-ID: <637611.42179.qm@web100619.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> Hi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From henrich at debian.or.jp Sat Sep 26 14:38:41 2015 From: henrich at debian.or.jp (Hideki Yamane) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 23:38:41 +0900 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] merge alioth and upstream git repo Message-ID: <20150926233841.18dab4bfa936b9e9e0cff509@debian.or.jp> Hi, I've merged upstream git and alioth repo as below steps. Just FYI, please let me know I can improve it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- git clone -o upstream https://github.com/johanmattssonm/birdfont.git cd birdfont git remote add alioth git+ssh://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-fonts/birdfont/ git pull alioth git checkout alioth/master git checkout -b debian/sid git checkout pristine-tar git remote remove alioth git checkout debian/sid git merge v2.12.0 for i in `git status |grep "both added"|awk '{print $3;}'`; do git checkout v2.12.0 $i; done git rm `git diff -U v2.12.0 |filterdiff -x */debian/*|grep +++| awk '{print $2}'|sed -e s%^b/%%` dch -v 2.12.0-1 git commit debian/changelog (ssh git.debian.org; rm -rf git.debian.org/git/pkg-fonts/birdfont.git) gbp create-remote-repo --remote-url-pattern=ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-fonts/birdfont.git git push --all -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Sat Sep 26 14:39:07 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 14:39:07 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Processing of birdfont_2.12.0-1_amd64.changes Message-ID: birdfont_2.12.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: birdfont_2.12.0-1.dsc birdfont_2.12.0.orig.tar.xz birdfont_2.12.0-1.debian.tar.xz birdfont_2.12.0-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Sat Sep 26 15:34:32 2015 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:34:32 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] birdfont_2.12.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Message-ID: Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 22:51:03 +0900 Source: birdfont Binary: birdfont Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.12.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Hideki Yamane Description: birdfont - font editor that lets you create outline vector graphics and expo Changes: birdfont (2.12.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release * debian/control - use python3 - add Depends: fonts-roboto to show menu * debian/rules - use python3 Checksums-Sha1: 9ae09e477bd189757138be72f956f6c9384aecce 2128 birdfont_2.12.0-1.dsc 98283f818de57d5c35df9bc9b2cd4d5e0e37a5d5 2214964 birdfont_2.12.0.orig.tar.xz 399420045b932cf6fa8540ee3545507246cf07c8 4068 birdfont_2.12.0-1.debian.tar.xz 9cbdab8775e4993b37aa449b6a737369875f8316 2807256 birdfont_2.12.0-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: a2861bf4033fa835c22be8911f9ddb9c3751a9498d76caa89b5e9c269728d45c 2128 birdfont_2.12.0-1.dsc 80e27bbbb73d5b9e8d96ccc2dcca4408447bba766528e9b0812b895d0af49c0e 2214964 birdfont_2.12.0.orig.tar.xz ac12573b1d58c8e370da90686997f2d64f58b7231dd2f485ea179303286671c6 4068 birdfont_2.12.0-1.debian.tar.xz 8ea4590f2acfd065c6d23cbd6512f9c7e89ee0ea937b16187320a0d88f281c7d 2807256 birdfont_2.12.0-1_amd64.deb Files: 205a6a59b016f2042adac7d130236252 2128 fonts extra birdfont_2.12.0-1.dsc cc6574166605568f9fc35f4dc1cee520 2214964 fonts extra birdfont_2.12.0.orig.tar.xz 5befcd70d77df91eff65e47ee0358618 4068 fonts extra birdfont_2.12.0-1.debian.tar.xz bab1e3a8227000bfb6ab70934bfb8871 2807256 fonts extra birdfont_2.12.0-1_amd64.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWBqzuAAoJEF0yjQgqqrFAWrUP/1HVUGQ4ArJ9nAsow9h5wzHU +BDGL6Uh3dCkPOISAQh3apWyWohet8MKLzRQsFWoyhLLzL3T0KPmn/6TOmklFiLY vMLU/hEeTD1VaBJa5R4P584VknxWqW/FfaLGopCZe6in7dtVhioODAlA71q/Yj6a 1Zf0zgn/Fmqn/+hlqB9LuZaU/gFHcSLghRRviJsmEntD06I9T0OEvBYgMiisjgnA uMPwwSzTaDclmIOz5ilLjpbB4lYUjqPk5LL/B0GGRkZTDPoR6KTpcYonocythCPl 2z5abEA2Of3AiJiPD/Vng3qKjMKaHCxQpHWI/FgghRWHTl3ikYYu3n6nLA0oqAPk 0xaXB8tuwbzQR1WsDmt8KCt88cm0cSQHpPUj4RYNqWquBURZNi7gHn7U65xdDPC8 TL2ieqqko7ZgWCuTnV2rNuC0i9m0o8Nld27OWncU+rhEMQob7UgdYhoHFjrg17M/ iri612EOXDi5p+sdKwQx7BfGHSdF9CMUPcf0eJK8HY2tAAOprWwqe7zYX0p7xtz3 2IJmGSHvhrqwYaN8tZ+gUzeHiGpCdvvzc47bITD+H6Hf8sGZA5D4Q56Ir5T6AOn5 +fIHT3A8OgsZoRF6dwMq7ZpYiwXwrepIR5enfeKkUJU5BZ5sfUdVkQSbyYVwj3n3 UtwieWvriVP9I+xEnaiA =MCx7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From noreply at release.debian.org Sat Sep 26 16:39:12 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 16:39:12 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fonts-pecita 5.2-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the fonts-pecita source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.3-1 Current version: 5.2-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From editor at pakinsight.com Sat Sep 26 07:36:21 2015 From: editor at pakinsight.com (Pakistan) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 07:36:21 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] 4th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Scientific Research Message-ID: Your email client cannot read this email. To view it online, please go here: http://marketing.pakinsight.com/display.php?M=510701&C=702073d253a928397cedaef9d7d50bf8&S=11&L=12&N=6 To stop receiving these emails:http://marketing.pakinsight.com/unsubscribe.php?M=510701&C=702073d253a928397cedaef9d7d50bf8&L=12&N=11 Powered by Hairyspire -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ABeamer at napavalley.edu Sun Sep 27 10:24:09 2015 From: ABeamer at napavalley.edu (Alan Beamer) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 03:24:09 -0700 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] (no subject) Message-ID: <6ADF225719795642BE40F6F460A272FF01E2B99F1414@mail.napavalley.edu> Do you need an investor? Our investors fund project and business. We also give out loan/credit to any individual and company at 3% interest rate yearly. For more information, Contact us via Email: omfcreditsrl at gmail.com If you need an investor or quick funding, forward your response ONLY to this E-mail: omfcreditsrl at gmail.com From antonshilov1nu at ro.ru Sun Sep 27 11:53:23 2015 From: antonshilov1nu at ro.ru (=?windows-1251?B?3evl7u3u8OAgyu7t7u3/6u4=?=) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:53:23 +0400 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?cp1251?b?MSDt7uJvZSDx7u7h+eXt6GUgb/Ig3evl7u3u?= =?cp1251?b?8OA=?= Message-ID: fac?book ???????? ?????: ??? ???????? ????? ??? ?????? ????? ??????, ??? ????????? ?????? ? ??????? ?? 1000$ ?? ?????? ???????, ??? ?????? ???????, ??? ???? ?????.. ????? ?? ?????? ??????? ?? 1000$ ????????? ???? ?????????? ?? pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org. ???? ?? ?? ?????? ???????? ??? ??. ?????? ?? Facebook, ???? ???? ?? ?? ??????, ????? ??? ????? ????????????? ??? ???????? ???????????? ??????, ??????????, ?????????? ?? ????????. Facebook, Inc., Attention: Department 399, PO Box 577899, Palo Alto, CA 34122 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From investing-bg at ofertite.org Tue Sep 29 00:50:54 2015 From: investing-bg at ofertite.org (INVESTING-BG) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 03:50:54 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0JjQndCS0JXQodCi0JjQoNCQ0Jkg0JfQkCA=?= =?utf-8?b?0KPQlNCe0JLQntCb0KHQotCS0JjQlSE=?= Message-ID: <2e841c0a1ab377251424c8745033b102@statsystem.eu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From produccion at algivert.com Tue Sep 29 04:58:10 2015 From: produccion at algivert.com (ACCOUNTANT) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] New Order Message-ID: <51f5f94817cdb66f51841163c9aae4b6@books-directory-projectreports.com> > Hello Sir, > > We did not receive your response about our new Order we sent to you. > Please find our re attached PO N0. 2201000741 it in excel format zipped. > > Please send us the order confirmation with delivery schedule so we can prepare payment. > > Thanks & regards > > Dr. Rahul Kasar, > Head | Cymbio Pharma | #234 | N.H.7 | Venkatala | Yelanka | Bangalore-560 064 | India > Ph: 91-080 28571353, 28571845, Ext 107 | M: +91 9900014113 > drrahul at karlegroup.com | www.cymbio.co.in > > Corporate headquarter- > Karel Group of Companies | No. 151, Industrial Suburb | Yeshwanthpur | > Bangalore-560 022| India | Ph: 080 41285301 to 15. > > www.karlegroup.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PO 2201000741.zip Type: application/zip Size: 563212 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dbermudez08 at aol.com Tue Sep 29 09:12:04 2015 From: dbermudez08 at aol.com (hi) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:12:04 +0800 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] oi Message-ID: <6EDF810A1EF14FFC4BEE9D9357F0A2FB@rbtvolqv> oi boa not?cia para voc? Latop, c?mera, TV, moto, bicicleta, rel?gio ... o frete ? gr?tis iphone 6plus,300euro we b: poazzlo. com From waterwipes at mailoffer.biz Tue Sep 29 08:11:27 2015 From: waterwipes at mailoffer.biz (Water Wipes) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:11:27 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0J3QsNC5IC0g0YfQuNGB0YLQuNGC0LUg0Lo=?= =?utf-8?b?0YrRgNC/0LjRh9C60Lgg0LIg0YHQstC10YLQsA==?= Message-ID: Your email client cannot read this email. To view it online, please go here: http://statsystem.eu/stats322/display.php?M=1168301&C=85c0fd1e141fe68f0c72dfac59992c77&S=34&L=30&N=12 To stop receiving these emails:http://statsystem.eu/stats322/unsubscribe.php?M=1168301&C=85c0fd1e141fe68f0c72dfac59992c77&L=30&N=34 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From postmaster at ssbinstrumentos.com.br Tue Sep 29 09:16:32 2015 From: postmaster at ssbinstrumentos.com.br (CIAL =?ISO-8859-1?Q?balan=E7as_t=E9cnicas?=) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 06:16:32 -0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?iso-8859-1?q?BALAN=C7AS_CONTADORAS_DE_PE=C7AS?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_-_100=25_nacionais_-_para_2=2C_5=2C_10=2C_25_E_50_QUILOS?= Message-ID: CIAL balan?as t?cnicas BALAN?AS CONTADORAS DE PE?AS 2, 5, 10, 25 E 50 QUILOS Valor promocional at? o dia 30/09/2015 - qualquer dos modelos R$ 1.199,00 - pagamento 25/50 dias Fa?a sua compra, envie seu pedido no e-mail: vendas at cialcomercio.com.br ou ligue (11) 3932-3535 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FINAL_LINHA_MC.jpg Type: application/octet-stream Size: 297729 bytes Desc: not available URL: From peteremmanuel110 at yahoo.co.jp Tue Sep 29 10:43:49 2015 From: peteremmanuel110 at yahoo.co.jp (Rebeca Attoumbe) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:43:49 +0900 (JST) Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] From Miss Rebeca Attoumbe, Message-ID: <681611.41753.qm@web100409.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> >From Miss Rebeca Attoumbe, ? Before I continue, let me introduce myself to you as Miss Rebeca Attoumbe, it is great pleasure to contact you in the first place no matter we have not meet before.But as long as you will reassure me of your sincerity to received this fund under your care until i arrive in your country. ? I am the Daugher of late Dr ROBIN GILLES Attoumbe of blessed memory, who was the Director General of Coffee/Cocoa Export Corporation(C.E.C.) of Ivory Coast? who died in a motor acident a few months ago in a private Hospital here in my country . ? Before his death he has being informing me of his fund in a prime bank here in Abidjan, Amount is? 3,5 million? Euro(Three? million Five hundred Thousand Euro ) ? Meanwhile I want to travel out of Ivory Coast entirely due to harasments here since after the war. I will like? you to assist me to get this money transferred into your nominated private account in your country for invesment purpose. You shall also source for good investment for both of us to? invest the money wisely. ? Please do consider my proposal and get back to me if it interest you, I will give you more Details upon your responses, For the interest of this transaction do not hesitate to contact me immediately you receive this message for more information to enable us proceed in concluding with all arrangement. No other person knows about this money expect me and you, ? Awaiting for your most urgent response. ? Thanks for your co-operation and remain blessed. ? Best Regards, ? Miss Rebeca Attoumbe. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pl at ninthfloor.org Tue Sep 29 18:59:52 2015 From: pl at ninthfloor.org (Paride Legovini) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:59:52 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Hack: new upstream version Message-ID: <560ADFA8.6050005@ninthfloor.org> Hi, I just packaged the latest upstream version of Hack and uploaded it to mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fonts-hack Any feedback will be appreciated. If everything is fine then I'll be very happy to get a sponsor for it. Thank you, Paride -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From neustoima at vipdeal.info Wed Sep 30 01:22:34 2015 From: neustoima at vipdeal.info (=?UTF-8?B?TmV1c3RvaW1hLmJnIC0g0KHQtdC60YHQuCDQsdC10LvRjNC+INC4INC00YDQtdGF0Lg=?=) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:22:34 +0300 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?b?0KDQsNC30L/QsNC70LXRgtC1INGB0YLRgNCw?= =?utf-8?b?0YHRgtC40YLQtSDRgdGK0YEg0L3QsNGI0LjRgtC1INC90LXRg9GB0YI=?= =?utf-8?b?0L7QuNC80L4g0YHQtdC60YHQuCDQuCDQtdGA0L7RgtC40YfQvdC4INC/?= =?utf-8?b?0YDQtdC00LvQvtC20LXQvdC40Y8h?= Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sascha at brawer.ch Wed Sep 30 07:11:53 2015 From: sascha at brawer.ch (Sascha Brawer) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:11:53 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#800495: fonts-noto: Change license for Noto fonts Message-ID: <20150930071153.7421.90454.reportbug@stretch.brawer.ch> Package: fonts-noto Version: 2015-05-11+cjk-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, the license of package fonts-noto has changed. All Noto fonts are now licensed under OFL-1.1. Before, some fonts were licensed under Apache-2.0 and some were under OFL-1.1. https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-fonts/blob/master/NEWS You might want to update the licensing info on this page: https://packages.debian.org/stretch/fonts-noto Also, packages.debian.org still points to code.google.com for the upstream project homepage; it has moved to this place: https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-fonts/ Best, - Sascha Sascha Brawer, www.brawer.ch, sascha at brawer.ch / sascha at google.com -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages fonts-noto depends on: ii fonts-noto-hinted 2015-05-11+cjk-1 Versions of packages fonts-noto recommends: ii fonts-noto-cjk 2015-05-11+cjk-1 ii fonts-noto-unhinted 2015-05-11+cjk-1 fonts-noto suggests no packages. -- no debconf information From fabian at debian.org Wed Sep 30 07:16:13 2015 From: fabian at debian.org (Fabian Greffrath) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:16:13 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Hack: new upstream version In-Reply-To: <560ADFA8.6050005@ninthfloor.org> References: <560ADFA8.6050005@ninthfloor.org> Message-ID: <1443597373.3518.3.camel@debian.org> Hi Paride, Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2015, 20:59 +0200 schrieb Paride Legovini: > If everything is fine then I'll be very happy to get a sponsor for > it. very nice package, thank you! Built and uploaded. - Fabian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From msanchot at hnn.sa.cr Wed Sep 30 05:48:07 2015 From: msanchot at hnn.sa.cr (=?utf-8?Q?Google=C2=A9?= 2015) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:48:07 -0600 (CST) Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] =?utf-8?q?Powered_By_Google=C2=A9_2015?= In-Reply-To: <538440730.181946.1443591416462.JavaMail.zimbra@hnn.sa.cr> References: <538440730.181946.1443591416462.JavaMail.zimbra@hnn.sa.cr> Message-ID: <1965541353.183368.1443592087170.JavaMail.zimbra@hnn.sa.cr> Dear Google User, You have been selected as a winner for using Google services. Find attached email with more details. Congratulations, Matt Brittin Chairman of the Board and Managing Director, Google United Kingdom. ?2015 Google Incorporation. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Powered By Google ?.doc Type: application/msword Size: 139264 bytes Desc: not available URL: