[pkg-fso-maint] debian: issues with latest packed fso

Luca Capello luca at pca.it
Sun Jun 14 15:43:06 UTC 2009


Hi Arne!

On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:36:32 +0200, arne anka wrote:
>> Do you mean that disabling deep-sleep (which I guess is something
>> implemented in hardware) and with proper power management (implemented
>> in software) you will increase stand-by time?
>
> here comes, how i understand it:
>
> 1)
[...]
> fso has iirc an algorithm, that tries to detect if deep sleep is
> usable or not. with my fr and the current debianized fso that
> algorithm apparently  fails.

Thank you for the detailed explanation.  The only help I can provide
here is packaging a new frameworkd snapshot:

  http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/smartphones-userland/2009-June/001615.html

> 2)
> improved power management by the kernel (and in userspace?) should
> increase standby independently of deep sleep -- and may make the
> differences between SLEEP=4 (deep sleep) and SLEEP=2 (no deep sleep)
> marginal.

Correct.

> 1) and 2) are independent of each other, inhowfar the independently
> achieved increase in standby adds up, i don't really know.
> but out of _personal_ interest, once i get the opportunity, _i_ will
> get that hw fix for #1024; just to get rid of it.

Is this the same as the buzz fix?  Or are the two independent?

> ps:  could you please send me your bank account data again? while
> cleaning up my inbox i deleted that mail, too.

Sent yesterday even before you asked ;-)

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 314 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20090614/ed5dfc3e/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-fso-maint mailing list