[pkg-fso-maint] Slowly uploading to main: independent packages
Luca Capello
luca at pca.it
Sun May 17 22:04:42 UTC 2009
Hi there!
On Fri, 15 May 2009 18:26:32 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 15.05.2009, 14:31 +0200 schrieb Luca Capello:
>> * xf86-video-glamo (xserver-xorg-video-glamo)
>>
>> Upstream files are under various licenses (XFree86, MIT and
>> GPL-2+), thus legal advice or upstream statement is necessary
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/05/msg00013.html
>
> IMHO this is no problem, both MIT and X license are compatible with the
> GPL, so I suggest you go ahead unless d-legal screams.
Everything is fixed now, both the license and autoreconf stuff:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520955#103
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/2009-May/001161.html
And then I forgot that there was another question (I promise, the last
one!): should we build it only for armel? AFAIK it is used no where
else but the FR, thus I do not see the point in providing binary
packages for other architecture. However, it compiles perfectly on
amd64 ;-)
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 314 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20090518/8185fd89/attachment.pgp>
More information about the pkg-fso-maint
mailing list