[pkg-fso-maint] shared library in binary-package?

[Nikita V. Youshchenko]

> Hi again,
>
> Am Dienstag 08 September 2009 schrieb Nikita V. Youshchenko:
> > >  - Make sure you don't provide shlibs.  The only reason to have a
> > > shlibs file is so that packages can declare a dependency on the
> > > shared library; since there shouldn't be anything doing this, having
> > > the shlibs will only invite accidents.
> >
> > Note that package we've just uploaded does provide an shlibs file.
> > Probably we should remove it.
>
> I have prepared a new revision of fso-usaged to not create and install
> the shlibs-file (and also the postinst and prerm modifications of it).

I see.

However, I doubt about this change.

It is causing lintian errors, not warnings.
It caused removal of ldconfig calls in postinst/postrm, which looks 
incorrect.
Amarok package, that is our 'precenent', does install shlibs.

I suggest to revert this change, at least for now.

Nikita