GPL - a invalid license choice?

[Jens Seidel]

On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:49:42PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 03:12:33AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > > The link refers to GPL version 2 which makes sense for me. But not to
> > > specify the version seems just wrong.
> > 
> > You're right, it might be better to specify the version.
> 
> Better indeed, but not required.  From the GPL (version 2):

Thanks, I didn't know it.

> Which means you are free to choose to accept only version 2 and later,
> and distribute it as such.  When doing that, you should of course change
> the headers to reflect this choice.

OK, I will keep it as it is. I just wondered and wanted to ask about it.

Jens