Bug#458275: should warzone2100 (beta) be in Debian testing (and migrate to stable)?

[Giel van Schijndel]

Paul Wise schreef:
> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 01:15 +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> Any thoughts on this?
> 
> Another beta might be a good idea, if it is done quickly.
> 
> Also, when the final release is done, we can put a warzone2100 backport
> on backports.org for lenny users to upgrade to. Many people don't know
> about backports.org though, so that might become a support issue/FAQ for
> the warzone devs.

To all devs (with or without commit access): I would really like this to
be an "active" decision on our part, as opposed to a "passive" one,
where we allow the decision to be made for us due to time passing. I.e.
either we decide that we do want our current state of 2.1 to be included
in Debian's next stable release, or we decide that we don't want that to
happen. As long as that decision is an active one, I can live with both.

The only negative impact of this on us I can see is the support/FAQ
issue mentioned above by Paul.

-- 
Giel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/attachments/20080724/9c517126/attachment.pgp