Bug#473382: 320x240 is too small

[Jens Seidel]

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 02:12:52PM +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> We currently only support resolutions of at least 640x480. This is due
> to very strict limitations in our codebase, of which changing will
> require at least several months.
> 
> Thus right now the minimal requirement is to use at least a
> screen/window resolution of 640x480. We *may* fix this in the future,
> it's not a particularly high priority feature though.

Using a virtual resolution ("Virtual" keyword in xorg.conf) would allow
using 640x480 applications with a reduced physical resolution. It may
not be the best solution but probably a good workaround ...

Jens