Bug#509702: fenix: should list architectures in source stanza

Peter Pentchev roam at ringlet.net
Fri Nov 26 00:08:12 UTC 2010


package fenix-plugins
tag 509702 + pending
thanks

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 08:43:34PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 01:57:59 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > reassign 509702 fenix-plugins
> > found 509702 0.0.20070803-3
> > thanks
> > 
> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 01:52:23AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > Package: fenix
> > > Version: 0.92a.dfsg1-5
> > > Severity: normal
> > > 
> > > fenix currently lists the architectures for which it should be built in
> > > the binary stanza of `debian/control'.  This is wrong.  Instead they
> > > should be moved to the source stanza so that builds fail immediately.
> 
> Ok, this applies to fenix, and was due to a bug in dpkg-dev fixed long
> time ago, a simple sourceful upload will fix this automatically as the
> .dsc will get generated anew.

Yep; thanks a lot to you and Luk Claes for the explanations, and my
apologies to Philipp Kern for misinterpreting his comments and raising
this storm in a teacup!  Fortunately, you were all smart enough to figure
out that Philipp himself was smart enough to not have tried to say what
I thought he was saying :)

I've made some unrelated changes to fenix and, while I'm there, marked
this bug to be closed in the next upload, hopefully coming soon.

> > > Apart from that: is there a reason why not all !64bit architectures
> > > are listed?  E.g. powerpc is missing from both fenix and fenix-plugins.
> > > There are also other architectures like sparc which have 32bit
> > > userspace.  (Not exactly sure about s390, but probably it does not
> > > have the weird 31bit one.)
> > > 
> > > I not-for-us'ed both packages on alpha, ia64 and amd64.
> > 
> > Oops, obviously it's already too late on this Christmas eve.  It looks
> > like only the first of a folded line was copied to fenix-plugins' control
> > file.  Thus reassigning and fenix-plugins' line is incomplete.
> 
> And this applies to fenix-plugins, and needs to get the Architecture
> fields in debian/control synced with the ones from fenix.

Right; I've also made some changes to fenix-plugins, and marked this bug to
be closed with the next upload, too.

Again, thanks for everything!

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev	roam at space.bg    roam at ringlet.net    roam at FreeBSD.org
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
If this sentence didn't exist, somebody would have invented it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/attachments/20101126/fc338f07/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Pkg-games-devel mailing list