sauerbraten_0.0.20140302-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Vincent Cheng]

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Scott Kitterman <debian at kitterman.com> wrote:
> On May 15, 2014 12:03:35 AM EDT, Vincent Cheng <vcheng at debian.org> wrote:
>>On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Debian FTP Masters
>><ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> An exception was raised while processing the package:
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line
>>98, in wrapper
>>>     function(upload, srcqueue, comments, transaction)
>>>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line
>>155, in comment_accept
>>>     transaction.copy_binary(db_binary, suite,
>>binary_component_func(db_binary), allow_tainted=allow_tainted,
>>extra_archives=[upload.target_suite.archive])
>>>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line
>>136, in binary_component_func
>>>     .join(Component).one()
>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/query.py",
>>line 2193, in one
>>>     "Multiple rows were found for one()")
>>> MultipleResultsFound: Multiple rows were found for one()
>>>
>>> Original comments:
>>>
>>>
>>> ===
>>>
>>> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
>>> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address
>>our
>>> concerns.
>>>
>>
>>Could a ftpmaster please explain why sauerbraten was rejected? The
>>above message is rather meaningless...
>>
>>Regards,
>>Vincent
>
> I accepted it. Not sure what happened.
>
> Scott K

Should I re-upload sauerbraten to NEW, or was it actually accepted?

Regards,
Vincent