[Pkg-gmagick-im-team] lintian clean

[Daniel Kobras]

Hi!

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:38:11PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> Also, what's your opinion on the name of the -dev packages? Should we
> keep the current name of libmagick9-dev (with a Provides: libmagick-dev)
> to keep the burden on the maintainers of depending packages for this
> transition as low as possible, or should we rename to libmagick-dev to
> avoid possible confusion?

I've now gone ahead, changed the names of the -dev packages back to
allow for easy binNMUs, and finally uploaded to experimental. The
package is currently awaiting NEW processing.

Regards,

Daniel.