Fri Jan 15 15:06:42 UTC 2010
type.xml, ImageMagick would be able to use the system fonts.
It seems that we didn't saw that ImageMagick was already using the
system fonts PLUS the ghostscript ones (by explicitly including them
in type.xml) [it could be true that on 2006 ImageMagick didn't had
support for fontconfig, but now it has and it reads the system fonts]
So I was wrong in understanding that ImageMagick wasn't reading the fonts
One thing that I don't understand however (and if somebody knows why,
I would be grateful for an explanation) is why fontconfig/imagemagick
doesn't see the ghostscripts fonts (and why it's necessary to
explicitly include them in type.xml).
But well, from what I see, it's just necessary a new upload reverting the
Agreed on this?
Thank you very much!
And sorry for the mess.
Pkg-gmagick-im-team mailing list
Pkg-gmagick-im-team at lists.alioth.debian.org
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
<p>I do not agree i thuink it worth to report upstream</p>
<p><blockquote type=3D"cite">Le=A016 mars 2010 21:52, "Nelson A. de Ol=
iveira" <<a href=3D"mailto:naoliv at debian.org">naoliv at debian.org</a>=
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt<br>
<<a href=3D"mailto:adam at adam-barratt.org.uk">adam at adam-barratt.org.uk</a=
> I've just built and installed a set of local imagemagick packages =
> the suggested patch from upstream (adding "Utopia" as an alt=
> font family) and I'm afraid I have to report that I still get the =
> If there's any further information I can provide to help, please l=
> know. I'm sure you'd like to get the imagemagick transition fi=
> quickly as I would. :-)<br>
<p><font color=3D"#500050"><br>On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Vincent Fou=
rmond <<a href=3D"mailto:fourmond at debian.org">fourmond at debian.org</a>>=
; wrote:<br>> =A0I don't know who'...</font></p>Maybe you need t=
o blame me? :-)<br>
More information about the Pkg-gmagick-im-team