Bug#235995: marked as done (gnome-core: should not depend on metacity or sawfish.. but window manager)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner@bugs.debian.org
Tue, 03 Aug 2004 03:18:18 -0700


Your message dated Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:56:21 +0200
with message-id <20040803095620.GA29538@nubol.int.oskuro.net>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2004 18:11:55 +0000
>From primoz@slo-tech.com Wed Mar 03 10:11:55 2004
Return-path: <primoz@slo-tech.com>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AyaqZ-0001UP-00; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 10:11:55 -0800
Received: from bsn-250-11-77.dsl.siol.net ([192.168.50.1]) [213.250.11.77] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AyaqY-00044L-00; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:11:54 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Primoz Bratanic <primoz@slo-tech.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gnome-core: should not depend on metacity or sawfish.. but window manager
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.49
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 19:11:53 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: primoz@slo-tech.com
Message-Id: <E1AyaqY-00044L-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,OUR_MTA_MSGID,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gnome-core
Version: 47
Severity: wishlist
Tags: sid

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Is there any special reason for gnome-core to strictly enforce metacity or
sawfish instead of any window manager?



- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.0-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sl_SI.UTF-8

Versions of packages gnome-core depends on:
pi  bug-buddy                     2.4.2-1    The GNOME Desktop Environment's bu
ii  eog                           2.4.1-2    Eye of Gnome graphics viewer progr
ii  gedit                         2.4.1-1    light-weight text editor
ii  gnome-applets                 2.4.2-2    Various applets for GNOME 2 panel
ii  gnome-control-center          1:2.4.0-5  The GNOME Control Center for GNOME
ii  gnome-icon-theme              1.1.3-1    GNOME Desktop icon theme
ii  gnome-panel                   2.4.2-3    Launch and/or dock GNOME 2 applica
ii  gnome-session                 2.4.2-1    The GNOME 2 Session Manager
ii  gnome-terminal                2.4.2-6    The GNOME 2 terminal emulator appl
pi  metacity                      1:2.6.5-1  A lightweight GTK2 based Window Ma
ii  nautilus                      2.4.2-2    file manager and graphical shell f
ii  scrollkeeper                  0.3.14-5   A free electronic cataloging syste
ii  yelp                          2.4.2-4    Help browser for GNOME 2

- -- no debconf information

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFARh/pHOuqnSwJthERAvKZAKCRKJl9cZWTeyeL8Y0sBMyGWBhWiACg1nbR
EIf5RfhyApg8XI9HoEq+XvU=
=7yKx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 235995-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2004 10:02:20 +0000
>From jordi@debian.org Tue Aug 03 03:02:20 2004
Return-path: <jordi@debian.org>
Received: from 115.red-213-96-69.pooles.rima-tde.net (natura.oskuro.net) [213.96.69.115] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Brw7g-0002gl-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 03:02:20 -0700
Received: from nubol.int.oskuro.net (nubol.int.oskuro.net [192.168.1.3])
	by natura.oskuro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570F427861
	for <235995-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue,  3 Aug 2004 12:01:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by nubol.int.oskuro.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 3048370A746; Tue,  3 Aug 2004 11:56:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:56:21 +0200
From: Jordi Mallach <jordi@debian.org>
To: 235995-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Not a bug
Message-ID: <20040803095620.GA29538@nubol.int.oskuro.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: 235995-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

As no alternatives have been proposed, I'm closing this bug.

The explicit dependency on metacity | sawfish is intended for assuring
GNOME compatibility.

Jordi
--=20
Jordi Mallach P=E9rez  --  Debian developer     http://www.debian.org/
jordi@sindominio.net     jordi@debian.org     http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/~jordi/

--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBD2FEJYSUupF6Il4RAgFLAKCOiGhB5pKvoVDFaYEYPtwNGtO8agCgk11L
asErytv8S7noZ6gYvpUeRzM=
=KTg7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--