Bug#328310: gedit-common: problems with alternatives
joss at debian.org
Thu Sep 15 19:47:35 UTC 2005
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 10:09 +0200, Loïc Minier a écrit :
> - is it ok not to comply with policy when this never happens in
> concrete usecases? (here, the use is never going to install
> gedit-common without gedit)
I believe this isn't OK.
> On my side, I'm looking at being policy compliant again, but it's not
> going to be funny (especially because of downgrades :-/).
You only have to make the new gedit package conflict with the current
gedit-common. As alternatives are removed in the prerm, this is OK.
.''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\
: :' : josselin.mouette at ens-lyon.org
`. `' joss at debian.org
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20050915/1e06590c/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-gnome-maintainers