Bug#351634: ftbfs: Package requirements (gnome-doc-utils >= 0.3.2) were not met

[Ondrej Sury]

On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 15:06 +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2006/02/06 14:50, Ondrej Sury <ondrej at sury.org> wrote:
> > Sure, this is what you get by mixing apples and pears.  This situation
> > cannot ever happen in testing/unstable and if you trying to backport
> > GNOME 2.12 you have to backport whole suite and not just some parts.
> 
> Your control file does not support this claim.  If I had to backport
> all of the GNOME 2.12 packages, then it would be up to the package
> maintainer (i.e. you) to declare proper build dependencies.

Build dependency must be created in such way that package builds on
distribution which is intended for (unstable - testing).  I am not aware
of any obligation to provide build dependency for every possible case
which could happen (ie. building on stable, ubuntu, whatever).  And
testing+unstable holds 0.5.2-1 version of gnome-pkg-tools.

If you are backporting unstable packages to stable then you must expect
some effort on your side (ie. playing with build depends, backporting
some additional packages, etc.)

Ondrej.
-- 
Ondrej Sury <ondrej at sury.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20060206/05913da5/attachment.pgp