Bug#342518: teatime: diff of NMU
seb128 at debian.org
Mon Jul 10 08:39:00 UTC 2006
On lun, 2006-07-10 at 18:11 +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 09:54:22AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > On lun, 2006-07-10 at 12:39 +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> > > + * New upstream (Closes: #296874, #342518, #293595, #313902,
> > > #260517)
> > Those are not requests for a new upstream version...
> OK, I see your point but it does fix them or otherwise incorporate
> them. I guess I should have split it out to say how it fixes it, but
> it felt a little redundant. Should I fix it somehow, or just "don't
> do that again"?
The usual way to write the changelog is something like:
* New upstream (Closes: #342518)
- fix german translation (Closes: #313902)
If you already uploaded don't bother for that one. Anyway, is there
anything justifying a NMU without letting a week to the maintainer on
that package? New versions are not a NMU reason usually...
More information about the Pkg-gnome-maintainers