Bug#403639: Fix committed in svn repo
Attilio Fiandrotti
attilio.fiandrotti at gmail.com
Tue Jan 9 21:53:29 CET 2007
Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
>
>>Just wanted to say the patch was eventually committed to gnome svn [1]:
>>i tried a backport to our 2.8.20 but was unable to due to that complex
>>set of patches already present :(
>>Would be possible building an experimental 2-8-20 udeb with this patch
>>to see what its effects are?
>
>
> It's not trivial to backport, the upstream 2.10 code doesn't map so
> well with our 2.8.20 with backported directfb and I think it wouldn't
> be possible to pull the 2.10 directfb files as they rely on the
> internal 2.10 functions. :-/
Yes, i know this patch adds comlexity to gtk+ 2.8.20, which is growing
to be a complicated hairball..
> I've applied the patch by hand the best I could, it built, could you
> please try the packages at:
> <http://people.dooz.org/~lool/debian/gtk+2.0/2.8.20-4/sid-pbuilder/>
>
thanks for patching: i built an iso [1] and it looks like leakage is now
small during normal questions display and still noticeable during
progressbar runs.
I'd like someone else than me (Frans?) give this iso a objective test
and report if he thinks the leakage is now reduced.
By my side, i'll investigate why we still leak when a progressbar is run
(this puzzles me, as the progressbar is never destroyed, just hidden).
Attilio
[1] https://debian.polito.it/downloads/mini_gtk+_2.8.20-4.iso
More information about the Pkg-gnome-maintainers
mailing list