Bug#432855: Test, libpango1.0 says 2 dependant files not in repository.

[debianisscrewedagain at exemail.com.au]

Thanks for replying.

> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007, debianisscrewedagain at exemail.com.au wrote:
>> This is a test to see if I some how left out colon in last submission
>> because this is the only way I can enter headers.
>>
>> apt-get install libpango1.0-dev complains about three dependancies and
>> specifically that two of them are not in the sarge repository.
>
>  Can you please followup to this bug with the "reportbug" tool?

>
>  Sarge should work just well,

It has for a while, but I had stable in /etc/apt/sources.list and woops
ran apt-get update.

Woops, s/stable/sarge/ and apt-get upgrade/update and it is mostly
working. Well, whatever I've put back.

This all comes from wanting to get firefox and thunderbird working again.

> libpango1.0-dev is installable in
>  sarge, you're probably mixing Debian repositories and end up with APT
>  errors.

Well, apt-get install is the one that suggests the repositories are wrong.
When I look at the three dependencies for libpango1.0-dev, it complains
about the two I mentioned and indicates it wants prior version to what it
can see.

If I've changed /etc/apt/sources.list "back" to sarge, and run apt-get
update, why would it be looking at the etch repository?

I understand what you are saying. So where else in my confuguration would
it be set? I thought it was all set in /etc/apt/sources.list


>  However, you should consider upgrading to the current stable
>  release of Debian: Etch.

lol, Never use version 1.0. I prefer to wait until a new stable has been
out at least six months before upgrading. I want to use linux, not be a
system administrator.


>
> --
> Loïc Minier
>