Bug#473951: gtk-doc: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: openjade(still installed)

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 02/04/08 at 19:39 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Mi, 2008-04-02 at 19:20 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 02/04/08 at 19:16 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > > severity 473951 important
> > > thanks
> > > 
> > > On Mi, 2008-04-02 at 12:33 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > Package: gtk-doc
> > > > Version: 1.10-1
> > > > Severity: serious
> > > > User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
> > > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080401 qa-ftbfs
> > > > Justification: FTBFS on i386
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
> > > > 
> > > > Likely to be caused by one of your build-deps depending on openjade.
> > > 
> > > I can't reproduce this with an up to date sid. Could it be that your
> > > build environment was confused by the conditional "openjade | jade
> > > | ..." dependencies of one of the build dependencies? An Ubuntu buildd
> > > had the same problem some time ago...
> > > 
> > > I'm lowering the severity to important now...
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Yes, sbuild doesn't support a | b build-dependencies (it always picks
> > a).
> 
> So that's a bug in sbuild then, right?

Not really. Your dependencies are hard to satisfy. I'm not sure using
Build-Conflicts is the better solution here, but I dont have anything
else to propose. So I'll just add this package to the list of packages
that can't be built with sbuild.

Feel free to close the bug if you want.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20080402/340702c6/attachment.pgp