making lintian warnings go away for libglade2

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

Hi Praveen,

Praveen A wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I made the libglade2 package lintian clean. What does everyone thinks
> about it? I see many more packages have this warning, is there a
> general agreement to keep these warnings by following the current
> naming scheme?
> 

> -Package: libglade2-0
> +Package: libglade-2.0-0

You can't just rename the package. That will mean you need to go through binary
NEW, you need to add Conflicts/Replaces, and all the reverse-dependencies will
need to be rebuilt. Not a good idea really. But we can fix it when/if the
library SONAME changes (i.e. when we need to rename the binary package).

Thanks for your interest anyway, feel free to provide patches for other issues!

Emilio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20090321/8d9a6d99/attachment.pgp