unarchived metacity bugs

[Sven Arvidsson]

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 13:22 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> 	Hi!
> 
>  I recently started to take a look at unarchived bugreports that were
> done ages ago already[1], and stumbled upon the list of ones that are
> filed against metacity.
> 
>  From a quick glance it seems like there might had been some bad closed
> versions sent, like in e.g. #192197 it was said to be fixed in 2.14.5-2
> while it should had been 1:2.14.5-2 (notice the 1: ). And #379462 claims
> to be fixed in 1:2.14.5-4 but that version doesn't seem to be in the
> changelog.
> 
>  I'm not sure if the other 23 closed bugreports fall into a similar
> category but it would be cool if you could do some QA work on the
> bugreports affecting metacity to clean these issues up!

Hi,

Thanks for the heads up. Cleaning up my own mess is certainly the least
I can do. 

What would be the easiest way to close these bugs, to make sure that
they are archived properly? I'm not really familiar with all the
intricacies of the BTS.

-- 
Cheers,
Sven Arvidsson
http://www.whiz.se
PGP Key ID 760BDD22

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20100813/441ef529/attachment.pgp>