Bug#562646: New upstream version
agx at sigxcpu.org
Sat Mar 27 08:16:12 UTC 2010
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:24:36PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:33 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Did you remove gdm from plymouth's init script LSB header? Othwerise
> > the
> > init system will stop plymouth way before gdm.
> The init script is called gdm3 in the new package, so it isn't having
> any effect.
You're right. I though it'd provide gdm and gdm3 but it doesn't.
In this case you should disable the start target alltogether in
plymouth's init script.
> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 17:42 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I also wonder whether this can actually work somothly if X is not
> > started on the first VT.
> > To be done correctly, this requires a VT manager, and we don’t have one.
> That's a good question, when I have a little more free time I will try
> out the patches and see if the VT switch is a problem.
Well shouldn't this work out if we launch plymouth on the same VT as
gdm3? Upstream has quiet a bunch of new code for this in 0.8.x.
More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers