Bug#579160: Fwd: Raw image and imagemagick

[Bastien ROUCARIES]

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Fabian Greffrath <fabian at greffrath.com> wrote:
> Am 21.05.2010 16:54, schrieb Hubert Chathi:
>>
>> I'll also split ufraw-batch into a separate package, to reduce the size
>> of the default install. (Probably the majority of users don't do raw
>> processing.)
>
> Great news, thank you very much. However, if you really split ufraw-batch
> into a separate package and other tools recommend this package for batch
> processing (which I highly appreciate), you should maybe keep the ufraw icon
> visible in the menu. The rationale is that you can expect the ufraw package
> to be installed on user demand then, other packages would just have pulled
> in ufraw-batch.
>
Could you check every reverse package on ufraw and fill a bug asking
to consider depend on ufraw-batch ?

Tahnsk

Bastien