Bug#580874: Make the relationship of #580873, #580874 and #590961 more clear

[Alexander Kurtz]

affects 580873 brasero
affects 590961 brasero
block 580874 by 580873
block 580874 by 590961
thanks

Hi,

I recently got aware of the fact that there seems to be a lot of
confusion on the net regarding optical disc burning with Brasero in
Debian/Ubuntu because of #580873, #580874 and #590961.

This has lead to a lot of bug reports[1-6] which are most likely
duplicates of #580874 and even to Ubuntu disabling Brasero's plugin
version check completely for lucid[7] and maverick[8]. IMHO this is not
necessary and backporting the fix for #590961 would have been the better
solution.

Hopyfully this mail makes the situation more clear. If not, don't
hesitate to ask!

Best regards

Alexander Kurtz

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/695269
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/695275
[3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/682329
[4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/566784
[5] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/605603
[6] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/529696
[7] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/529696/comments/169
[8] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/529696/comments/170
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20110324/d98e328a/attachment-0001.pgp>