[From nobody Thu Jul 16 11:20:10 2009
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2007 18:53:05 +0000
Return-path: <debian@noemamedia.com>
Received: from p15177515.pureserver.info ([212.227.62.112])
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HA9ib-0000UD-3s
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:53:05 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by p15177515.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2811406D07
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:52:32 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at p15177515.pureserver.info
Received: from p15177515.pureserver.info ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (p15177515.pureserver.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id Y1qbhlkK4lr6 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
	Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:52:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pluto.sonne.nil (p54A05BDD.dip.t-dialin.net [84.160.91.221])
	by p15177515.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F571406D06
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:52:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:52:22 +0100
From: Alexander Loob <debian@noemamedia.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: [gnupg]: bad signature
Message-ID: <20070125195222.37471fac@pluto.sonne.nil>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gnupg
Version: 1.4.6-1
Severity: normal

I don=C2=B4t know, if this is exactly a bug, but I discovered some serious
behaviour:

I=C2=B4ve modified my key some weeks ago, and after that, some of my friends
reported to me, that my signature seems to be bad.

So today I=C2=B4ve tested a bit with new keys.

First I have generated a new key with windows gpg 1.4.6 and enigmail and
sent some mails to myself and to a friend (incl. the pub key). All works
fine. After that I=C2=B4ve imported this key (pub and sec) my linux keyring.
Now when I send a mail to myself or to a friend, gnupg reports a bad
signature. After that, I=C2=B4ve exported the imported key, and see, that
there are differences from the imported public key and the exported
public key, the private key is the same. When I encrypt and sign the
mail, gnupg reports a good signature.

So I=C2=B4ve generated a new key under linux (via gnupg in the shell), and =
send
some mails to me and a friend (incl. pub key) and gnupg reports still a
bad signature. Even under windows, when I import the linux newly generated
key, there are the same errors.

At the third step I=C2=B4ve generated a new key (pub and sec) with gnupg un=
der
windows and tested it (it works). After that `ve copied all files
(thrusted.db etc.) from windows to my linux ~/.gnupg directory. And when
I send a mail to myself or a friend, gnupg reports again a bad signature,
but under windows with the exactly same key not.

Greetings
Alexander Loob

]