[From nobody Fri Jul 17 20:10:21 2009
Received: (at 180445-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2009 19:59:54 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
	(2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 19; hammy, 65; neutral, 50; spammy, 1.
	spammytokens:0.947-+--HX-Priority:Normal
	hammytokens:0.000-+--gnupg, 
	0.000-+--H*i:sk:2009071, 0.000-+--H*f:sk:2009071, 0.001-+--sk:daniel,
	0.001-+--sk:daniel.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
	PHONENUMBER,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Return-path: <daniel.leidert@wgdd.de>
Received: from 217-20-127-75.internetserviceteam.com ([217.20.127.75]
	helo=mail.wgdd.de) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <daniel.leidert@wgdd.de>) id 1MRtax-00068J-R5
	for 180445-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:59:53 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54954 helo=webmail.wgdd.de)
	by mail.wgdd.de with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <daniel.leidert@wgdd.de>) id 1MRtan-0003px-NP
	for 180445-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:59:41 +0200
Received: from 94.223.202.82
	(SquirrelMail authenticated user daniel.leidert@wgdd.de)
	by webmail.wgdd.de with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:59:41 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <aa1a3a6e0ff9b890b2192356fa465353.squirrel@webmail.wgdd.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090717195058.GI14842@deprecation.cyrius.com>
References: <1247740598.5922.24.camel@leidi>
	<20090717195058.GI14842@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:59:41 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Bug#180445: gnupg: Sort signatures by signature date
From: "Daniel Leidert" <daniel.leidert@wgdd.de>
To: 180445-done@bugs.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal

Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert@wgdd.de> [2009-07-16 12:36]:
>> gnupg already seems to use some kind of sorting by date. So I
>> wonder, if your report can be closed?
>
> I don't know if it does now.  But I don't care much about this feature
> anymore, so feel free to close it anyway.

Doing so then.

Regards, Daniel


]