[Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep and FHS in Debian (why is
it i always want to make fun of such subjects)
jon at windj.ath.cx
Wed Aug 10 20:08:40 UTC 2005
Gürkan Sengün <gurkan at linuks.mine.nu> writes:
> (kinda like in GNUstep and Debian drowning in FHS ;)
> Dear friends, Eric,
> Is there any solution in sight that'll make anyone happy?
> (I'm asking since I will want to u se the latest gnustep packages,
> and update some gnustep software that got new releases, and
> more will be coming soon) and i'm all for enabling fat binaries.
Good question. Where are we with this?
I quite like Gurkan's suggestion, except not quite as high in the system
root, perhaps /GNUstep. Tidy. Visible. I doubt this is acceptable
though. If the consensus is that GNUstep is not, and cannot be made FHS
compatible then the policy should be adapted. I don't think anyone
wants to see GNUstep packages removed from debian.
Also - we need gnustep packages to be rebuilt, so things will work
again. GWorkspace is ready for an upgrade.
More information about the pkg-GNUstep-maintainers