[Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep and FHS in Debian (why is it i always want to make fun of such subjects)

[Jonathan Shipley]

Hi All,

Gürkan Sengün <gurkan at linuks.mine.nu> writes:

> (kinda like in GNUstep and Debian drowning in FHS ;) 
>
> Dear friends, Eric,
>
> Is there any solution in sight that'll make anyone happy?
> (I'm asking since I will want to u se the latest gnustep packages,
> and update some gnustep software that got new releases, and
> more will be coming soon) and i'm all for enabling fat binaries.

Good question.  Where are we with this?  

I quite like Gurkan's suggestion, except not quite as high in the system
root, perhaps /GNUstep.  Tidy.  Visible. I doubt this is acceptable
though.  If the consensus is that GNUstep is not, and cannot be made FHS
compatible then the policy should be adapted.  I don't think anyone
wants to see GNUstep packages removed from debian.

Also - we need gnustep packages to be rebuilt, so things will work
again.  GWorkspace is ready for an upgrade.

?
-- 
Jonathan