[Debian GNUstep maintainers] .bundle vs .app in binary package names
Gürkan Sengün
gurkan at linuks.mine.nu
Sun Nov 25 13:37:50 UTC 2007
Hello Yavor
> Some time ago I noticed that binary packages that were providing
> GNUstep bundles (like Camaelon, WildMenus) were renamed from
> foo.bundle to foo.app. I couldn't find any discussion about it. Was
> it imposed by the ftpmasters, release team, etc?
I'm not sure it was public, or it was but I don't care to find it.
It was imposed to my by either myon and daniel at debian.org (my
sponsors),
I don't remember who wanted the rename or wouldn't sponsor it though
(for open.app/open.tool).
> I think it is wrong to name them foo.ap -- if foo.bundle is forbidden,
> renaming them to just "foo" is better (but it may collide with other
> packages, of course).
I agree. but open is not better in that case.
> Could you please give some pointers/advice? Thanks!
Sorry, that's all I know, you might want to bug the others--good luck,
Guerkan
--
while(!asleep()) sheep++;
More information about the pkg-GNUstep-maintainers
mailing list