[Debian GNUstep maintainers] .bundle vs .app in binary package names

[Gürkan Sengün]

Hello Yavor

> Some time ago I noticed that binary packages that were providing
> GNUstep bundles (like Camaelon, WildMenus) were renamed from
> foo.bundle to foo.app.  I couldn't find any discussion about it.  Was
> it imposed by the ftpmasters, release team, etc?

I'm not sure it was public, or it was but I don't care to find it.
It was imposed to my by either myon and daniel at debian.org (my 
sponsors),
I don't remember who wanted the rename or wouldn't sponsor it though
(for open.app/open.tool).

> I think it is wrong to name them foo.ap -- if foo.bundle is forbidden,
> renaming them to just "foo" is better (but it may collide with other
> packages, of course).

I agree. but open is not better in that case.

> Could you please give some pointers/advice?  Thanks!

Sorry, that's all I know, you might want to bug the others--good luck,
Guerkan

-- 
while(!asleep()) sheep++;