[Pkg-gnutls-maint] libgcrypt11

[Andreas Metzler]

On 2006-06-25 James Westby <jw+debian at jameswestby.net> wrote:
> On (25/06/06 15:37), Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> On 2006-06-25 James Westby <jw+debian at jameswestby.net> wrote:
>>> On (25/06/06 14:31), Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>>>> --- libgcrypt-1.2.2-upstream/src/misc.c 2005-07-29 15:45:42.000000000 +0200
>>>> +++ libgcrypt11-1.2.2-1/src/misc.c      2006-06-25 09:57:58.000000000 +0200
>>>> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
>>>>  #include <stdlib.h>
>>>>  #include <string.h>
>>>>  #include <stdarg.h>
>>>> -#include <assert.h>
>>>>  #include <unistd.h>
[...]
>>> I think they are trivial, and it doesn't really matter whether they are
>>> in or out. I kept them as I could see this was something upstream had
>>> intentionally done. If you want then I will remove them all again.
>> [...]

>> Hmm I fail to parse "as I could see this was something upstream had
>> intentionally done."

>> Afaict (see snipped SVN logmessage) upstream intentionally *removed*
>> them.

> Yes, that's what I meant, upstream intentionally removed assert.h from
> lots of files, so I kept the patches that did this in the debian
> version. 

Ah I see - not + in the diff. These are patches for
libgcrypt11_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz to make it more similar to the real
upstream libgcrypt-1.2.2.tar.gz. I thought we are going to do
* Clean packaging against upstream tarball.
i.e. reuploading with upstream's libgcrypt-1.2.2.tar.gz.

cu andreas
-- 
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
howsoever undertaken.                                (c) Jasper Ffforde