Processing of gnutls26_2.8.1-1_i386.changes

Simon Josefsson simon at josefsson.org
Thu Jun 11 08:37:21 UTC 2009


Andreas Metzler <ametzler at downhill.at.eu.org> writes:

>> do you have some links to the BTS where the status of that can be
>> tracked? 
>
> I think this one is complete:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=libgnutls-config;users=ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org

Ouch.

I wonder if we shouldn't temporarily add a small debian-specific script
for libgnutls-config/libgnutls-config-extra to solve this problem faster
than requiring uploads by everyone else.  What do you think?

We could install the scripts from 2.6.x, attached below.

It would be good to solve the above bugs too, but they could be done as
wishlist bugs and wouldn't hold up the 2.8.x package in debian.

Too bad 2.8.1 was just released, I could have reverted this upstream.
I'm beginning to think that maybe we should.  The scripts would still be
deprecated, and could warn to stderr and the syslog to get noticed, but
old packages would still build.

/Simon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libgnutls-config
Type: text/x-sh
Size: 1719 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnutls-maint/attachments/20090611/8934a39b/attachment.sh>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libgnutls-extra-config
Type: text/x-sh
Size: 1738 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnutls-maint/attachments/20090611/8934a39b/attachment-0001.sh>


More information about the Pkg-gnutls-maint mailing list