From noreply@alioth.debian.org Tue Feb 1 04:16:08 2005 From: noreply@alioth.debian.org (noreply@alioth.debian.org) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:16:08 -0700 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] =?ISO-8859-1?B?WyBwa2ctZ3Jhc3MtQnVncy0zMDExNTAgXSBtYXBzZXJ2OiByZWxvY2F0aW9uIGVycm9yOiAvdXNyL2xpYi9saWJnZGFsLnNvLjE6IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBzeW1ib2w6IF9aVEkxM1hNTEVudGl0eURlY2w=?= Message-ID: Bugs item #301150, was opened at 2005-01-28 15:23 You can respond by visiting: http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410558&aid=301150&group_id=30241 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody (None) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: mapserv: relocation error: /usr/lib/libgdal.so.1: undefined symbol: _ZTI13XMLEntityDecl Initial Comment: Useing debian sid. I get all the mapserver packages from the alioth.debian.org mirror. I have set this mirror in the apt preferences to give it the prority. I get this error when I try mapserv for anything. This error was solved in Paul bakers package but its an Ad-hok solution while bakers packages is from an old ersion of mapserver and the solution is to keep the old version of libgdal1. Any idea ? Thankyou Michael info about my configuration: $ dpkg -s cgi-mapserver Package: cgi-mapserver Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: devel Installed-Size: 769 Maintainer: Thomas Sondag Architecture: i386 Source: mapserver Version: 4.4.1-0.dgis.unstable.1 ... $ dpkg -s libgdal1 Package: libgdal1 Status: install ok installed Priority: extra Section: libs Installed-Size: 4584 Maintainer: Silke Reimer Architecture: i386 Source: gdal Version: 1.2.5-1 ... $ dpkg -s gdal-bin Package: gdal-bin Status: install ok installed Priority: extra Section: science Installed-Size: 216 Maintainer: Silke Reimer Architecture: i386 Source: gdal Version: 1.2.5-1 ... regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody (None) Date: 2005-01-31 21:16 Message: Logged In: NO Please answer to maiqui@gmail.com thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410558&aid=301150&group_id=30241 From noreply@alioth.debian.org Tue Feb 1 11:53:03 2005 From: noreply@alioth.debian.org (noreply@alioth.debian.org) Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 04:53:03 -0700 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] =?UTF-8?B?WyBwa2ctZ3Jhc3MtQnVncy0zMDExNTAgXSBtYXBzZXJ2OiByZWxvY2F0aW9uIGVycm9yOiAvdXNyL2xpYi9saWJnZGFsLnNvLjE6IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBzeW1ib2w6IF9aVEkxM1hNTEVudGl0eURlY2w=?= Message-ID: Bugs item #301150, was opened at 28-01-2005 23:23 You can respond by visiting: http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410558&aid=301150&group_id=30241 >Category: mapserver Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody (None) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: mapserv: relocation error: /usr/lib/libgdal.so.1: undefined symbol: _ZTI13XMLEntityDecl Initial Comment: Useing debian sid. I get all the mapserver packages from the alioth.debian.org mirror. I have set this mirror in the apt preferences to give it the prority. I get this error when I try mapserv for anything. This error was solved in Paul bakers package but its an Ad-hok solution while bakers packages is from an old ersion of mapserver and the solution is to keep the old version of libgdal1. Any idea ? Thankyou Michael info about my configuration: $ dpkg -s cgi-mapserver Package: cgi-mapserver Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: devel Installed-Size: 769 Maintainer: Thomas Sondag Architecture: i386 Source: mapserver Version: 4.4.1-0.dgis.unstable.1 ... $ dpkg -s libgdal1 Package: libgdal1 Status: install ok installed Priority: extra Section: libs Installed-Size: 4584 Maintainer: Silke Reimer Architecture: i386 Source: gdal Version: 1.2.5-1 ... $ dpkg -s gdal-bin Package: gdal-bin Status: install ok installed Priority: extra Section: science Installed-Size: 216 Maintainer: Silke Reimer Architecture: i386 Source: gdal Version: 1.2.5-1 ... regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody (None) Date: 01-02-2005 05:16 Message: Logged In: NO Please answer to maiqui@gmail.com thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410558&aid=301150&group_id=30241 From 293346@bugs.debian.org Wed Feb 2 17:03:16 2005 From: 293346@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 09:03:16 -0800 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] Bug#293346: Acknowledgement (ITP: libecw -- Library for Enhanced Compressed Wavelet(ECW) and JPEG 2000 image I/O) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. As you requested using X-Debbugs-CC, your message was also forwarded to debian-devel@lists.debian.org (after having been given a Bug report number, if it did not have one). Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 293346@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to submit@bugs.debian.org). Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Fri Feb 11 20:48:10 2005 From: katie@ftp-master.debian.org (Archive Administrator) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:48:10 -0500 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] Processing of grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.changes Message-ID: grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1.dsc grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2.orig.tar.gz grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1.diff.gz grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb grass-doc_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_all.deb libgrass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb libgrass-dev_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon From installer@ftp-master.debian.org Fri Feb 11 21:02:22 2005 From: installer@ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Installer) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:02:22 -0500 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.changes is NEW Message-ID: grass-doc_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_all.deb to pool/main/g/grass/grass-doc_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_all.deb grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/grass/grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1.diff.gz grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1.dsc to pool/main/g/grass/grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1.dsc grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/grass/grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/grass/grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2.orig.tar.gz (new) libgrass-dev_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb optional libdevel GRASS GIS library development files Commonly referred to as GRASS, this is a Geographic Information System (GIS) used for geospatial data management and analysis, image processing, graphics/map production, spatial modeling, and visualization. GRASS is currently used in academic and commercial settings around the world, as well as by many government agencies and environmental consulting companies. . This package contains the header files for developing with GRASS. Install this package if you wish to develop software that manipulates GRASS data sets. (new) libgrass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb optional libs GRASS GIS development libraries Commonly referred to as GRASS, this is a Geographic Information System (GIS) used for geospatial data management and analysis, image processing, graphics/map production, spatial modeling, and visualization. GRASS is currently used in academic and commercial settings around the world, as well as by many government agencies and environmental consulting companies. . These libraries provide the means to access and manipulate GRASS data sets. Changes: grass (5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1) unstable; urgency=high . * New upstream release (Closes: #264566) - Safe tmpdir creation (Closes: #287651) - tcltkgrass replaced by d.m (Closes: #282567) - r.in.gdal segfault fixed (Closes: #234275) - r.in.bin segfault fixed (Closes: #259655) - r.lags.1grass.gz: "name" section too long (removed) (Closes: #261726) - raster.html: non explained commands (removed) (Closes: #287590) - i.rectify.html: links to i.vpoints.html work (Closes: #287764) - i.points.html: imagery.ps link fixed (Closes: #287763:) * Help button doc path fixed (Closes: #287591) * Change libgrass0 -> libgrass Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 234275 259655 261726 264566 282567 287590 287591 287651 287763 287764 Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. From installer@ftp-master.debian.org Sat Feb 19 14:39:30 2005 From: installer@ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Installer) Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:39:30 -0500 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.changes ACCEPTED Message-ID: Accepted: grass-doc_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_all.deb to pool/main/g/grass/grass-doc_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_all.deb grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/grass/grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1.diff.gz grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1.dsc to pool/main/g/grass/grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1.dsc grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/grass/grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/grass/grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2.orig.tar.gz libgrass-dev_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/grass/libgrass-dev_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb libgrass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/grass/libgrass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 234275 259655 261726 264566 282567 287590 287591 287651 287763 287764 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. From owner@bugs.debian.org Mon Feb 21 22:18:07 2005 From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:18:07 -0800 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] Bug#262814: marked as done (rebuild with libtiff4, upload with urgency=medium) In-Reply-To: <1109023827.3899.53.camel@marcy> References: <1109023827.3899.53.camel@marcy> <20040801201437.0498036830.qww314159@soup> Message-ID: Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:10:27 -0500 with message-id <1109023827.3899.53.camel@marcy> and subject line Closing #262814: rebuild with libtiff4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2004 00:18:02 +0000 >From ejb@ql.org Sun Aug 01 17:18:02 2004 Return-path: Received: from lakermmtao10.cox.net [68.230.240.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BrQWf-00050R-00; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:18:02 -0700 Received: from gwendolyn.in.ql.org ([68.100.32.28]) by lakermmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with ESMTP id <20040802001730.PGJL20727.lakermmtao10.cox.net@gwendolyn.in.ql.org> for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:17:30 -0400 Received: from soup.in.ql.org (soup.in.ql.org [10.160.59.17]) by gwendolyn.in.ql.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-1) with ESMTP id i720EcUL020036 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:14:38 -0400 Received: from soup.in.ql.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by soup.in.ql.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id i720EbBq011267 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:14:37 -0400 Received: (from ejb@localhost) by soup.in.ql.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i720EbYV011263; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:14:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 20:14:37 -0400 From: Jay Berkenbilt To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org Subject: rebuild with libtiff4, upload with urgency=medium Message-ID: <20040801201437.0498036830.qww314159@soup> Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Severity: Serious Justification: FTBFS Package: grass As of version 5.0.3-4, package grass has not yet been rebuilt with libtiff4. Please rebuild the package with libtiff4 and upload with urgency=medium. Note that taking care of this problem is a prerequisite for ultimately being included in sarge, even if a version of this package already appears in testing. No source changes are required; updating dependencies and rebuilding should be sufficient. All packages not uploaded within several days will be NMUed. Many thanks for your patience and cooperation. All maintainers and package tracking system addresses for affected packages have been previously notified. As a reminder, here is a copy of that original notification (slightly edited). Note that since this was sent out, there have been various other threads on both debian-devel and debian-release. --- An accidental ABI change was made in libtiff (upstream) between version 3.5.7 (the version currently in sarge) and 3.6.1 (the version currently in sid). This has resulted in 10 merged release-critical bugs filed against libtiff3g for packages that don't work correctly when compiled with one of these versions and run with the other. Unfortunately, since this problem has been left unresolved for some time, many packages have been compiled with 3.6.1 in sid and have transitioned into sarge where they may not work correctly with 3.5.7. Some of these packages are known to work correctly in sid but not in sarge. Transitioning version 3.6.1 of libtiff into sarge is unaccaptable because it would create incompatbility with woody and third-party applications that were compiled with libtiff 3.5.7 or earlier. To ensure that this problem is fully corrected, sarge will not contain a libtiff.so.3. Version 3.6.1 of libtiff will be included as libtiff.so.4, with support of upstream. All packages that depend upon libtiff3g or libtiff3g-dev will have to be rebuilt with libtiff4 or libtiff4-dev. Doing this update is a precondition for the package being included in sarge. Please note that there were no source-level interface changes between 3.5.7 and 3.6.1, so it should be sufficient to just update the dependencies and recompile. Use urgency=medium when making this change. It will be important for these changes to be made quickly as, once the new tiff packages are uploaded, many packages will no longer be installable or buildable from source. As such, release-critical bugs (severity serous, justification FTBFS) will be filed against any package that still depends upon libtiff3g or libtiff3g-dev a few days after the upload of the new tiff packages, and any packages that have not been fixed and uploaded within approximately one week will be NMUed. Once all packages that depend upon libtiff have appeared in sid, all these packages will be able to transition into sarge together. For additional background information on this solution, please see and its associated thread. For more information on the problem itself, please see -- Jay Berkenbilt http://www.ql.org/q/ --------------------------------------- Received: (at 262814-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2005 22:10:28 +0000 >From debian@adkgis.org Mon Feb 21 14:10:27 2005 Return-path: Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3Ll5-0007a6-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:10:27 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.47] ([70.18.100.81]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0ICA00GYE89CEFD5@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for 262814-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:10:27 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:10:27 -0500 From: Steve Halasz Subject: Closing #262814: rebuild with libtiff4 To: 262814-done@bugs.debian.org Message-id: <1109023827.3899.53.camel@marcy> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 262814-done@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 522052 From owner@bugs.debian.org Tue Feb 22 01:33:06 2005 From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:33:06 -0800 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] Bug#252684: marked as done (i.out.erdas.1: duplicate) In-Reply-To: <1109035442.3899.64.camel@marcy> References: <1109035442.3899.64.camel@marcy> Message-ID: Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:24:02 -0500 with message-id <1109035442.3899.64.camel@marcy> and subject line i.out.erdas.1: duplicate has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2004 18:01:02 +0000 >From jidanni@jidanni.org Fri Jun 04 11:01:02 2004 Return-path: Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BWJ02-00087i-00; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 11:01:02 -0700 Received: from tc218-187-74-125.2-3.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.74.125]:32792 helo=jidanni1) by frodo.hserus.net with asmtp (Cipher TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.34 #0) id 1BWIzy-0006xI-1c by authid with plain for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 23:31:01 +0530 Received: from jidanni by jidanni1 with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BW29m-0001SZ-42; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 08:01:58 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Jacobson To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: i.out.erdas.1: duplicate X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58 Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 08:01:57 +0800 Message-Id: Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: grass Version: 5.0.3-3 Severity: minor File: /usr/lib/grass5/man/man1/i.out.erdas.1 You have duplicates, e.g., $ dlocate t.erdas.1 grass: /usr/lib/grass5/man/man1/i.out.erdas.1 grass: /usr/share/man/man1/i.out.erdas.1grass.gz $ dlocate t.erdas.1|awk '{print $2}'|xargs man will show you which looks better. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 252684-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 01:24:01 +0000 >From debian@adkgis.org Mon Feb 21 17:24:01 2005 Return-path: Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.42] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3OmP-0001Uz-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:24:01 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.47] ([70.18.100.81]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0ICA00BI5H7YSLA0@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for 252684-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:23:59 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:24:02 -0500 From: Steve Halasz Subject: i.out.erdas.1: duplicate To: 252684-done@bugs.debian.org Message-id: <1109035442.3899.64.camel@marcy> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 252684-done@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Fixed in 5.7.0+6.0.0beta21 From owner@bugs.debian.org Tue Feb 22 01:33:08 2005 From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:33:08 -0800 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] Bug#287762: marked as done (i.target: no go interactively) In-Reply-To: <1109035752.3899.67.camel@marcy> References: <1109035752.3899.67.camel@marcy> Message-ID: Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:29:12 -0500 with message-id <1109035752.3899.67.camel@marcy> and subject line i.target: no go interactively has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2004 22:14:02 +0000 >From jidanni@jidanni.org Wed Dec 29 14:14:02 2004 Return-path: Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cjm4w-0004W7-00; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:14:02 -0800 Received: from tc218-187-76-15.2-4.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.76.15]:33001 helo=jidanni1) by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa (Cipher TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.43 #0) id 1Cjm4v-00074S-Fc by authid with plain for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 03:44:02 +0530 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Jacobson To: Debian Bug Tracking System X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please Subject: i.target: no go interactively X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:45:15 +0800 Message-Id: Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: grass Version: 5.7.0-6 Severity: minor File: i.target I try to answer the first question but it wont let me click on any of the two directories shown. I click Help, but that is a broken link. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 287762-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 01:29:10 +0000 >From debian@adkgis.org Mon Feb 21 17:29:09 2005 Return-path: Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3OrN-0002Z0-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:29:09 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.47] ([70.18.100.81]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0ICA00G8HHGJS1E3@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for 287762-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:29:08 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:29:12 -0500 From: Steve Halasz Subject: i.target: no go interactively To: 287762-done@bugs.debian.org Message-id: <1109035752.3899.67.camel@marcy> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 287762-done@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Fixed in 5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1. Help explains that you need to create an imagery group with i.group, before you can select it with i.target. Steve From owner@bugs.debian.org Tue Feb 22 15:49:11 2005 From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:49:11 -0800 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] Processed: your mail In-Reply-To: <1109086217.3899.11.camel@marcy> References: <1109086217.3899.11.camel@marcy> Message-ID: Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 287760 Small fonts in i.points Bug#287760: i.points.html: can't quit ... oh, fonts so tiny Changed Bug title. > severity 287760 minor Bug#287760: Small fonts in i.points Severity set to `minor'. > reassign 287760 grass Bug#287760: Small fonts in i.points Bug reassigned from package `grass-doc' to `grass'. > reassign 281742 grass-doc Bug#281742: grass: MAN PAGES GONE AGAIN Bug reassigned from package `grass' to `grass-doc'. > reassign 229086 grass-doc Bug#229086: grass: inconsistencies between man pages and available commands Bug reassigned from package `grass' to `grass-doc'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From owner@bugs.debian.org Tue Feb 22 15:49:14 2005 From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:49:14 -0800 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] Bug#252685: marked as done (17.6h.raster.html: links broken) In-Reply-To: <1109085510.3899.5.camel@marcy> References: <1109085510.3899.5.camel@marcy> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:18:30 -0500 with message-id <1109085510.3899.5.camel@marcy> and subject line 17.6h.raster.html: links broken has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2004 18:01:31 +0000 >From jidanni@jidanni.org Fri Jun 04 11:01:30 2004 Return-path: Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BWJ0U-00088b-00; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 11:01:30 -0700 Received: from tc218-187-74-125.2-3.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.74.125]:32792 helo=jidanni1) by frodo.hserus.net with asmtp (Cipher TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.34 #0) id 1BWJ0T-0006xI-Hb by authid with plain for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 23:31:30 +0530 Received: from jidanni by jidanni1 with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BW1zr-0001OZ-NI; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 07:51:43 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Jacobson To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: 17.6h.raster.html: links broken X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58 Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 07:51:43 +0800 Message-Id: Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: grass-doc Version: 5.0.3-3 Severity: normal File: /usr/share/doc/grass-doc/html/html/help/17.manual/17.6h.raster.html The links in this page are broken. Also don't say: To access information on a command, highlight the command using the RETURN key, then press ESC. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 252685-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 15:18:37 +0000 >From debian@adkgis.org Tue Feb 22 07:18:37 2005 Return-path: Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3bo5-0001bD-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:18:37 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.47] ([70.18.100.81]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0ICB00HBYJUUE370@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for 252685-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:18:36 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:18:30 -0500 From: Steve Halasz Subject: 17.6h.raster.html: links broken To: 252685-done@bugs.debian.org Message-id: <1109085510.3899.5.camel@marcy> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 252685-done@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Fixed in grass-5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1 From owner@bugs.debian.org Tue Feb 22 16:18:17 2005 From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:18:17 -0800 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] Bug#256208: marked as done (grass: r.in.bin segfaults) In-Reply-To: <1109088070.3899.16.camel@marcy> References: <1109088070.3899.16.camel@marcy> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:01:10 -0500 with message-id <1109088070.3899.16.camel@marcy> and subject line Bug #256208: grass: r.in.bin segfaults has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2004 13:12:32 +0000 >From kjetil@kjernsmo.net Fri Jun 25 06:12:32 2004 Return-path: Received: from pooh.kjernsmo.net [217.77.32.186] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BdqVL-0003hM-00; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 06:12:32 -0700 Received: from ti100710a080-2479.bb.online.no ([80.213.233.175] helo=owl.kjernsmo.net) by pooh.kjernsmo.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BdqUp-0007pc-PG; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:12:00 +0200 Received: from kjetil by owl.kjernsmo.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BdqWR-0001J3-00; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:13:39 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kjetil Kjernsmo To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: grass: r.in.bin segfaults X-Mailer: reportbug 2.60 Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:13:39 +0200 Message-Id: Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: grass Version: 5.0.3-4 Severity: normal I've just started playing around with some of the SRTM-3 DEMs, and so I thought I'd give GRASS a spin, but this is how far I'm getting....: GRASS:~ > r.in.bin bytes=2 input=/home/kjetil/Fritid/Fjell/ChangTang/N35E081.hgt output=N35E081.raster title=Kunlun south=35N west=81E r=1201 c=1201 Segmentation fault GRASS:~ > The input file is from ftp://edcsgs9.cr.usgs.gov/pub/data/srtm/Eurasia/N35E081.hgt.zip just unzipped. Since I'm relatively new to GIS systems, it is possible my parameters are so weird no program could possibly grok them, but my homebrew import into the R statistics system works fine, so I think I'm not totally off.... :-) Besides, a program shouldn't ever segfault, should it? It may be related to Bug #234275, but since the discussion in that bug is going in a very different direction, I opened a new bug instead. I sort of think this bug should be "important", since it isn't a lot you can do if you can't data in, but I leave it entirely to the maintainers to decide things like that. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-backstreet-ruby.2004-03-25.1-owl Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages grass depends on: ii fftw2 [fftw2-double] 2.1.3-16 Library for computing Fast Fourier ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgd2-noxpm 2.0.23-2 GD Graphics Library version 2 (wit ii libgdal1 1.2.0-1 Geospatial Data Abstraction Librar ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-6 PNG library - runtime ii libpq3 7.4.2-4 Shared library libpq.so.3 for Post ii libreadline4 4.3-10 GNU readline and history libraries ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System Session Management ii libtiff3g 3.5.7-2 Tag Image File Format library ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxmu6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System miscellaneous util ii tcl8.3 8.3.5-4 Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8 ii tcsh [c-shell] 6.13.00-1 TENEX C Shell, an enhanced version ii tk8.3 8.3.5-4 Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.3 - ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86] ii xlibmesa-glu [libglu1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-3 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 256208-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 16:01:11 +0000 >From steve@adksoftware.com Tue Feb 22 08:01:11 2005 Return-path: Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3cTG-0000JY-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:01:10 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.47] ([70.18.100.81]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0ICB00HVHLTXDLC0@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for 256208-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:01:10 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:01:10 -0500 From: Steve Halasz Subject: Bug #256208: grass: r.in.bin segfaults To: 256208-done@bugs.debian.org Message-id: <1109088070.3899.16.camel@marcy> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 256208-done@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Fixed in grass-5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1 From owner@bugs.debian.org Tue Feb 22 18:03:16 2005 From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:03:16 -0800 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] Bug#261483: marked as done (grass: Please consider GRASS 5.3 for Sarge) In-Reply-To: <200502221855.27895.kjetil@kjernsmo.net> References: <200502221855.27895.kjetil@kjernsmo.net> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:55:27 +0100 with message-id <200502221855.27895.kjetil@kjernsmo.net> and subject line Closing since 5.7 is going in has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2004 09:50:50 +0000 >From kjetil@kjernsmo.net Mon Jul 26 02:50:50 2004 Return-path: Received: from pooh.kjernsmo.net [217.77.32.186] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bp28A-0007vZ-00; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:50:50 -0700 Received: from ti100710a080-7282.bb.online.no ([80.213.252.114] helo=owl.kjernsmo.net) by pooh.kjernsmo.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bp27e-0000kz-9Q for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:50:18 +0200 Received: from kjetil by owl.kjernsmo.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bp27r-0001lt-00 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:50:31 +0200 From: Kjetil Kjernsmo To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: grass: Please consider GRASS 5.3 for Sarge X-Debbugs-CC: Kjetil Kjernsmo Message-Id: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:50:31 +0200 Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: grass Version: 5.0.3-4 Severity: wishlist I have over the past couple of weeks read up a little bit on GRASS, and I have communicated with the developers of GRASS. I'm still new user, I'm an astrophysicist looking into GIS, but I'm trying to get started. It is has become compelling to me that Sarge should ship with the 5.3 branch of GRASS rather than the 5.0 branch. I hope to make a compelling argument in this wishlist bug. As far as I have understood the upstream developers, version 5.3.1 is due out soon, and I hope the maintainers will consider packaging this version when it is ready. The 5.0 branch is stable in the sense "doesn't change", not in the sense "works more reliably". There are many problems in the 5.0.3 release that are not likely to be fixed, but are allready fixed in 5.3. Among them are many if not most of the bugs reported against this package. It is my understanding that it is Debian Stable role to have a reliable and predictable platform, and so, it is the distributions role to "don't change". Obviously, very moving targets is bad for a distribution, since you might coincidentally get a snapshot at a time when it was unstable. The other extreme, basing the distribution on non-changing software, I see very little value in, as I view it as a feature of Debian Stable to do the freeze at a reasonable time. The 5.0 release is allready two years outdated. This includes features and bugfixes. To me, the current 5.0.3 are unusable, due to bugs that will be fixed in upstream 5.3.1. If one insists on shipping Sarge with 5.0.3, one would have to backport many bugfixes from the 5.3 branch to get the packages in usable state -- a daunting task indeed. Furthermore, if Sarge is released with 5.0.3, GRASS in Debian will most likely be four years outdated by the next Debian Stable release. At that point, the package will lag so far behind the state of the art that the packages will be unusable to the vast majority of users, and most of the GRASS community will not very likely be very eager to support and help Debian users with their outdated software (I know I wouldn't... :-) ). With the release of 5.3.0 on 15 May 2004, the situation has changed substantially from a few months back. The 5.3 branch is presently not so much of a moving target, as Debian can include a specific release, not just a snapshot of CVS. The 5.3 release has seen many improvements, as well as bugfixes not available in 5.0.3. It therefore seems to be appropriate for Sarge when released. Now, one could of course discuss whether 5.7 should go into unstable. While it has many desireable features, and we have a 5.7.0 release now, it is still much more a moving target than 5.3, and getting it into Sid would risk that Sarge would be released with 5.0.3 if there are release-critical issues with 5.7. I for one would like to avoid that. Getting GRASS 5.3 tested and hopefully included in Sarge is my hope. Then, there is the possibility of having 5.7 in experimental. I realize that packaging GRASS and making sure it builds automatically on all architectures is a non-trivial matter, and I wish to thank the maintainers for putting time into this. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-ruby.2004-07-25.owl.1.oss Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages grass depends on: ii fftw2 [fftw2-double] 2.1.3-16 Library for computing Fast Fourier ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgd2-noxpm 2.0.23-2 GD Graphics Library version 2 (wit ii libgdal1 1.2.0-1 Geospatial Data Abstraction Librar ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-6 PNG library - runtime ii libpq3 7.4.2-4 Shared library libpq.so.3 for Post ii libreadline4 4.3-11 GNU readline and history libraries ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management ii libtiff3g 3.5.7-2 Tag Image File Format library ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxmu6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous util ii tcl8.3 8.3.5-4 Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8 ii tcsh [c-shell] 6.13.00-1 TENEX C Shell, an enhanced version ii tk8.3 8.3.5-4 Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.3 - ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86] ii xlibmesa-glu [libglu1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-5 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 261483-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 17:57:17 +0000 >From kjetil@kjernsmo.net Tue Feb 22 09:57:17 2005 Return-path: Received: from pooh.kjernsmo.net [217.77.32.186] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3eHd-0005JM-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:57:17 -0800 Received: from [80.254.47.36] (helo=roo.kjernsmo.net) by pooh.kjernsmo.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3eH6-0001Ah-HA for 261483-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:56:44 +0100 From: Kjetil Kjernsmo To: 261483-done@bugs.debian.org Subject: Closing since 5.7 is going in Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:55:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 X-FOAF: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/foaf.rdf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502221855.27895.kjetil@kjernsmo.net> Delivered-To: 261483-done@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Hi! With 5.7/6.0 going into unstable, I think a big w00t, *claps* and a done is the right thing to do to this bug. Thanks, everybody! Kjetil From owner@bugs.debian.org Thu Feb 24 21:33:15 2005 From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:33:15 -0800 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] Bug#296816: marked as done (libgrass fails to install (file conflict with libgrass0)) In-Reply-To: <1109280118.3948.8.camel@marcy> References: <1109280118.3948.8.camel@marcy> Message-ID: Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:21:58 -0500 with message-id <1109280118.3948.8.camel@marcy> and subject line Bug#296816: libgrass fails to install (file conflict with libgrass0) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 20:41:25 +0000 >From dieter.riegler@univie.ac.at Thu Feb 24 12:41:25 2005 Return-path: Received: from mail.univie.ac.at (imap.univie.ac.at) [131.130.1.27] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D4PnZ-0003vJ-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:41:25 -0800 Received: from physlab01 (physlab01.geo.univie.ac.at [131.130.63.107]) by imap.univie.ac.at (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1OKfHJt251488 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:41:19 +0100 Received: from dieter by physlab01 with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D4PnQ-0007c0-SQ for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:41:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" From: dieter riegler To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: libgrass fails to install (file conflict with libgrass0) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:41:16 +0100 Message-Id: X-DCC-ZID-Univie-Metrics: mx8 4248; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by imap.univie.ac.at id j1OKfHJt251488 Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgrass Version: 5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1 Severity: important When installing libgrass, dpkg encountered the following error: dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/libgrass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_i386.deb (--unpack): versuche =C2=BB/usr/lib/grass/lib/libgrass_datetime.6.0.0beta2.so=C2=AB = zu =C3=BCberschreiben, welches auch in Paket libgrass0 ist dpkg-deb: Unterprozess paste get=C3=B6tet mit Signal (Daten=C3=BCbergabe unterbrochen (broken pipe)) translation: trying to overwrite ..., which is also in paket libgrass0. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=3Dde_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) Versions of packages libgrass depends on: ii fftw2 [fftw2-double] 2.1.3-16 Library for computing Fast F= ourier ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared librar= ies an ii libgdal1 1.2.5-1 Geospatial Data Abstraction = Librar ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for termina= l hand ii libtiff4 3.7.1-4 Tag Image File Format (TIFF)= libra ii proj 4.4.9-1 Cartographic projection filt= er and ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Mesa 3D graphics library [XF= ree86] ii xlibmesa-glu [libglu1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Mesa OpenGL utility library = [XFree ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtim= e -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 296816-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 21:22:07 +0000 >From debian@adkgis.org Thu Feb 24 13:22:07 2005 Return-path: Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D4QQx-0005nw-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:22:07 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.47] ([70.18.100.81]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0ICF002GZQ0MWOL1@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for 296816-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:22:06 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:21:58 -0500 From: Steve Halasz Subject: Re: Bug#296816: libgrass fails to install (file conflict with libgrass0) In-reply-to: To: dieter riegler , 296816-done@bugs.debian.org Message-id: <1109280118.3948.8.camel@marcy> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE References: Delivered-To: 296816-done@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: You previously installed an experimental version of grass from the debian-gis archive. This isn't really a bug since libgrass0 was never= in main. Try: dpkg -r libgrass0 libgrass-dev and then installing grass. Regards, Steve On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 21:41 +0100, dieter riegler wrote: > Package: libgrass > Version: 5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1 > Severity: important >=20 > When installing libgrass, dpkg encountered the following error: >=20 > dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von > /var/cache/apt/archives/libgrass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_i386.deb (--unp= ack): > versuche =BB/usr/lib/grass/lib/libgrass_datetime.6.0.0beta2.so= =AB zu > =FCberschreiben, welches auch in Paket libgrass0 ist > dpkg-deb: Unterprozess paste get=F6tet mit Signal (Daten=FCbergabe > unterbrochen (broken pipe)) >=20 > translation: trying to overwrite ..., which is also in paket libgra= ss0. >=20 > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 3.1 > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') > Architecture: i386 (i686) > Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 > Locale: LANG=3Dde_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8= ) >=20 > Versions of packages libgrass depends on: > ii fftw2 [fftw2-double] 2.1.3-16 Library for computing = Fast Fourier > ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared = libraries an > ii libgdal1 1.2.5-1 Geospatial Data Abstra= ction Librar > ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for t= erminal hand > ii libtiff4 3.7.1-4 Tag Image File Format = (TIFF) libra > ii proj 4.4.9-1 Cartographic projectio= n filter and > ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Mesa 3D graphics libra= ry [XFree86] > ii xlibmesa-glu [libglu1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Mesa OpenGL utility li= brary [XFree > ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - = runtime >=20 > -- no debconf information >=20 >=20 From noreply@alioth.debian.org Fri Feb 25 13:37:45 2005 From: noreply@alioth.debian.org (noreply@alioth.debian.org) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:37:45 -0700 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] =?ISO-8859-1?B?WyBwa2ctZ3Jhc3MtQnVncy0zMDEyMjcgXSBJIGNhbnQgYWNjZXNzIERlYmlhbiBHSVMgd2l0aCBhcHQtZ2V0?= Message-ID: Bugs item #301227, was opened at 2005-02-25 06:37 You can respond by visiting: http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410558&aid=301227&group_id=30241 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody (None) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: I cant access Debian GIS with apt-get Initial Comment: Hello, Maybe the server is down, I dont know. Please take a look. Cheers ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410558&aid=301227&group_id=30241 From ftpmaster@debian.org Sat Feb 19 14:39:23 2005 From: ftpmaster@debian.org (Anthony Towns) Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:39:23 -0500 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] Comments regarding grass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.changes Message-ID: Hi, ---- lintian check for libgrass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_alpha.deb ---- E: libgrass: md5sum-mismatch usr/lib/grass/lib/libgrass_gproj.6.0.0beta2.so W: libgrass: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig W: libgrass: postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig W: libgrass: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig Please make sure these are fixed. From dieter riegler , 296816@bugs.debian.org Thu Feb 24 20:41:16 2005 From: dieter riegler , 296816@bugs.debian.org (dieter riegler) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:41:16 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-grass-devel] Bug#296816: libgrass fails to install (file conflict with libgrass0) Message-ID: Package: libgrass Version: 5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1 Severity: important When installing libgrass, dpkg encountered the following error: dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von /var/cache/apt/archives/libgrass_5.7.0+6.0.0beta2-1_i386.deb (--unpack): versuche =C2=BB/usr/lib/grass/lib/libgrass_datetime.6.0.0beta2.so=C2=AB = zu =C3=BCberschreiben, welches auch in Paket libgrass0 ist dpkg-deb: Unterprozess paste get=C3=B6tet mit Signal (Daten=C3=BCbergabe unterbrochen (broken pipe)) translation: trying to overwrite ..., which is also in paket libgrass0. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=3Dde_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) Versions of packages libgrass depends on: ii fftw2 [fftw2-double] 2.1.3-16 Library for computing Fast F= ourier ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared librar= ies an ii libgdal1 1.2.5-1 Geospatial Data Abstraction = Librar ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for termina= l hand ii libtiff4 3.7.1-4 Tag Image File Format (TIFF)= libra ii proj 4.4.9-1 Cartographic projection filt= er and ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Mesa 3D graphics library [XF= ree86] ii xlibmesa-glu [libglu1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Mesa OpenGL utility library = [XFree ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtim= e -- no debconf information