epr-api_2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Joerg Jaspert]

Hi Maintainer,

im sorry but I have to reject this package as there are files with
(C)/license headers not mentioned. src/example contains BSD licensed
files and they require explicitly to be mentioned.

And while I am on it, you could take the second paragraph out of the
long description of the package. It would never end up in main if it
wouldn't be open source and as such the whole 2 lines are
redundant. Good for the marketing buzz on the homepage of the software,
but useless in Debian package descriptions. :)

-- 
bye Joerg



===

Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.